They don't seem to offer the old video embed code now, so here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_fp5kaVYhk
Disclaimer: A few characters of questionable reliability do appear.
A few more financial dots connected with 9/11?
A refreshingly different, yet familar take. Along the same lines as have been discussed here: Money, money, money.
They don't seem to offer the old video embed code now, so here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_fp5kaVYhk
Disclaimer: A few characters of questionable reliability do appear.
They don't seem to offer the old video embed code now, so here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_fp5kaVYhk
Disclaimer: A few characters of questionable reliability do appear.
"No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money."
Hi Rumpl... does anyone know or can anyone speculate why Rumsfeld would annouce on 9/10 that 2.3T was missing/unaccounted for? What purpose would that serve and why a day before? It's not like all those involved scurried to pull this off upon having that piece of info revealed, so I am not sure what the significance of making that public would be.
Anyone have a guess?
red
Anyone have a guess?
red
just cos things are fucked up doesn't mean it isn't progress...
also, btw, with the creation of this paint the narrator speaks of which helped in collapsing the buildings, wouldn't one assume it would be ideal commercially to use that in sky-scrapers in order to bring them down without causing wider area destruction around streets during major fires? so perhaps how buildings come down is not so much a big factor in pin-pointing guilt. only why the 9/11 incident happened to begin with. no?
the bigger issue/question with knowing such collapse would occur, tho, would be why authorities wouldn't have called for immediate evacuation.
red
the bigger issue/question with knowing such collapse would occur, tho, would be why authorities wouldn't have called for immediate evacuation.
red
just cos things are fucked up doesn't mean it isn't progress...
(a) Because it was GOING to come out. So, why not have it come out on the ONE day during which ALL news would become irrelevant and uninteresting the very next day?RedMahna wrote:Hi Rumpl... does anyone know or can anyone speculate why Rumsfeld would annouce on 9/10 that 2.3T was missing/unaccounted for? What purpose would that serve and why a day before? It's not like all those involved scurried to pull this off upon having that piece of info revealed, so I am not sure what the significance of making that public would be.
Anyone have a guess?
red
(b) If you're going to make sure all the accounting guys who you want taken out with this strike on the West Wing of the P-Gon, give them a reason to hit their offices running the next morning. Or give yourself an excuse to make the decree that "any vacations are canceled, everybody be at work tomorrow, on time." Sounds cruel, but that's how organized crime works. (Btw, this "take out" scenario also explains why "something" penetrated several layers of those Pentagon rings. They had a specific job to do, and an aluminum airplane nose probably wasn't going to do the job.)
(c) Thirdly, a reason along the lines of a theory about power and control that I hold: everyone involved in the crime has to lay out their dirty laundry to the masses, so they need the bosses' protection to keep it under wraps (with their disclosure or continued obfuscation in the MSM).
It's why Skull & Bonesmen do their weird group masturbation and "telling of secrets." Everyone in the room has dirt on everyone else. They thrive or die as a group.
"No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money."
thx Rump... well i'm all for them dying as a group!! just not by taking out innocent people around them simultaneously.
just cos things are fucked up doesn't mean it isn't progress...
-
theSaiGirl
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 5:33 pm
- Contact:
What of those masses who suddenly experience a gestalt over 9/11 ? There will be millions and millions blowing their minds as they go back to all the videos of the Towers blowing up and try to come to terms with how monstrously they've been lied to and manipulated. The individual and mass rage will be impossible to contain, Because most will now totally reconfigure their world views to assimilate that jarring insight with the personal disaster of each individual life: foreclosure, bankruptcy, bullying by bureaucrats and lawyers, police state humiliations, divorces, suicides... all those millions of tales of woe and individual misery will be desperately seeking a target for blame; a sacrificial goat from the narrative that fits into the general narrative of "world collapsing" with a modicum of explanatory coherence. That object will be long past the shelf-life of its camouflage as the elephant in the living room.
9/11 has already been engineered into a huge epochal myth (as Zelikow boasts) that is permanently enshrined in global mass popular culture as the "pivot" or starting-point for every catastrophe that has followed in its wake. That moment in memory (like the earlier JFK hit) will be seen as epoch-making; the "beginning of the end", because the very perps themselves (via Mass Media) have burned it into the mass psyche. That is the reckless gamble they took. As the transparency of 9/11 is assimilated into world views it will be enmeshed and entangled with a host of other tragic memes: Wall St. investment bankers,, neocons, Israel lobby, Zionist controlled media, Hollywood brainwashing.
9/11 will always be a singular event in the hive mind, but it will never be seen in isolation from everything else that has followed. Mass logic tends to be linear as in "post hoc ergo propter hoc". 9/11 will always be seen as a precipitating event to the chain of economic and social chaos that quickly followed. Even though we here perhaps have a deeper understanding of it as merely an escalating action linked to a coherent chain of actions and plans. That won't matter in popular culture. No one will a give a damn whether thermite, thermate, thermobarics, micro-nukes, DEW or methane from concentrated cow farts was used to blow up the Towers (or the now iconic WTC7). The details won't matter in the least. Most will be focused on the names of the public perps (Silverstein, Zakheim, Chertoff, Zelikow, Jerome Hauer, Maurice Greenberg, etc.) and what those names might share in common.
I predict that in the long run, the greatest resentment among those embittered millions will be focused not on what, how or even WHY all this happened.
Instead, I expect mass popular culture to fixate intensely on WHO done it.
Because the association of that "who" with just about every other significant "controlled demolition" (financial or cultural) is just too transparent.
9/11 has already been engineered into a huge epochal myth (as Zelikow boasts) that is permanently enshrined in global mass popular culture as the "pivot" or starting-point for every catastrophe that has followed in its wake. That moment in memory (like the earlier JFK hit) will be seen as epoch-making; the "beginning of the end", because the very perps themselves (via Mass Media) have burned it into the mass psyche. That is the reckless gamble they took. As the transparency of 9/11 is assimilated into world views it will be enmeshed and entangled with a host of other tragic memes: Wall St. investment bankers,, neocons, Israel lobby, Zionist controlled media, Hollywood brainwashing.
9/11 will always be a singular event in the hive mind, but it will never be seen in isolation from everything else that has followed. Mass logic tends to be linear as in "post hoc ergo propter hoc". 9/11 will always be seen as a precipitating event to the chain of economic and social chaos that quickly followed. Even though we here perhaps have a deeper understanding of it as merely an escalating action linked to a coherent chain of actions and plans. That won't matter in popular culture. No one will a give a damn whether thermite, thermate, thermobarics, micro-nukes, DEW or methane from concentrated cow farts was used to blow up the Towers (or the now iconic WTC7). The details won't matter in the least. Most will be focused on the names of the public perps (Silverstein, Zakheim, Chertoff, Zelikow, Jerome Hauer, Maurice Greenberg, etc.) and what those names might share in common.
I predict that in the long run, the greatest resentment among those embittered millions will be focused not on what, how or even WHY all this happened.
Instead, I expect mass popular culture to fixate intensely on WHO done it.
Because the association of that "who" with just about every other significant "controlled demolition" (financial or cultural) is just too transparent.
well, yeah, but it's not like the masses can find these people. meantime, we as a civilization are bickering amongst ourselves over issues of religion, abortion, gun control, unions, the enviroment, yadda-yadda... not all bad things to be concerned about, just not the culprits. the elections in the US proved that we were more concerned over the petty differences between coke and pepsi.
red
red
just cos things are fucked up doesn't mean it isn't progress...
Yeah, I saw this recently on the Democratic Underground "Creative Speculation" section and reposted it on my favorite music and bullshit chat board, Black Cat Bone. Everyone there thinks I'm nuts but I try to get the word out. Anyway, one comment I got was a an LOL icon and "Ocean's 9/11, anyone?." But is true, 9/11 was a heist.