Eureka! Solved: The Mind/Matter Genesis
Electrons are described as geometrical point particles doing magical things, as Gaede points out, this is conceptual nonsense. The rope explanation of spin is clockwise and anti-clockwise rotating threads. End of story
~"“True observation begins when devoid of set patterns, and freedom of expression occurs when one is beyond systems.”"~
Existing AI is fundamentally stupid.
Nature is wayyyy ahead.
Transhuman tomorrow? Nope.
DNA is a four dimensional system.
Multiple levels unfolding in time.
Complexity beyond belief.
Nature is wayyyy ahead.
Transhuman tomorrow? Nope.
DNA is a four dimensional system.
Multiple levels unfolding in time.
Complexity beyond belief.
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
They only function when open.
Ritual Sacred Cow Slaughter by David Bohm
First a short clip of mass scale sacred cow slaughter:
Oh yes. My own analysis agrees.
The next video is cow killing one by one.
Still as lethal though.
Whatever could we do without DB.
The man is so non-hysterical and measured.
Compare him to all the gung-ho scientists who am plain WRONG.
First a short clip of mass scale sacred cow slaughter:
Oh yes. My own analysis agrees.
The next video is cow killing one by one.
Still as lethal though.
Whatever could we do without DB.
The man is so non-hysterical and measured.
Compare him to all the gung-ho scientists who am plain WRONG.
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
They only function when open.
Great channel. This new one.
Short, sweet and right on the money.
Aware of Huygens Wave consolidation as per Milo Wolff
Short, sweet and right on the money.
Aware of Huygens Wave consolidation as per Milo Wolff
Dyslexic Artist Theory on the Physics of 'Time'
34.4K subscribers
Premiered on 22 Dec 2021
This video explain how Huygens Principle and the light photon of quantum mechanics are both part of the same geometrical process.
Huygens principle states that: Every point on a wave front may be considered a source of secondary spherical 4π wave, which spreads out in the forward direction at the speed of light. In the Huygens description there is no explanation of why we choose only the forward direction.
In this theory, each point on a wave front represents the potential for a photon spherical oscillation or vibration. We have photon electron coupling or dipole moment forming the potential for new spherical waves. The wave front can only spread out in the forward direction, because it is part of an emergent process that forms the forward passage of time.
Relative to each object or life form the forward momentum of light and the forward passage of time are part of the same process formed by the spontaneous absorption and emission of light. We have an uncertain ∆×∆p×≥h/4π future coming into existence with the exchange of photon energy ∆E=hf with each photon spherical oscillation.
The wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons are forming a blank canvas that we can interact with forming the possible into the actual. In this theory, creation is truly in the hand and eye of the beholder!
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
They only function when open.
I tend to disagree with most geometrical and mathematical models after being Gaede pilled but of course there is always something to be learnt. I still feel like the breakthrough will not be math and geometry based but this is the only language we have to learn from each other.
On a related note I just found out about Chris Langan, a lot of good stuff in there, not all
On a related note I just found out about Chris Langan, a lot of good stuff in there, not all
~"“True observation begins when devoid of set patterns, and freedom of expression occurs when one is beyond systems.”"~
One hour in.....
The dude certainly has angles sussed....
The dude certainly has angles sussed....
Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe
Langan has developed an idea he calls the "Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe" (CTMU) which he maintains "explains the connection between mind and reality, therefore the presence of cognition and universe in the same phrase".
He calls his proposal "a true 'Theory of Everything', a cross between John Archibald Wheeler's 'Participatory Universe' and Stephen Hawking's 'Imaginary Time' theory of cosmology" additionally contending that with CTMU he "can prove the existence of God, the soul and an afterlife, using mathematics."
Even so, Langan does not belong to any religious denomination, explaining that he "can't afford to let logical approach to theology be prejudiced by religious dogma".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
They only function when open.
Nice interview(er).
The theory is truly all encompassing in its scope.
Haven't examined the specifics but nice toolset.
It's got real metaphysics more than physics.
The Paper:
http://knowledgebase.ctmu.net/wp-conten ... 9021-1.pdf
http://hology.org/
Here he is in the last two weeks.
At 50 minutes the conversation hits the NWO, social, cultural.
The theory is truly all encompassing in its scope.
Haven't examined the specifics but nice toolset.
It's got real metaphysics more than physics.
The Paper:
http://knowledgebase.ctmu.net/wp-conten ... 9021-1.pdf
http://hology.org/
Here he is in the last two weeks.
At 50 minutes the conversation hits the NWO, social, cultural.
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
They only function when open.
Consciousness is a direction. Reality is its expression. Perception is its orientation. We are but vectors in the flow of universal energy. Despite this, we can still have a happy new year. 
The grand design, reflected in the face of Chaos.
Well said, Happy New Year Firen !
~"“True observation begins when devoid of set patterns, and freedom of expression occurs when one is beyond systems.”"~
Bernardo Kastrup on Analytical Idealism, Materialism,
The Self, and the Connectedness of You and I
Bernardo Kastrup has been leading the modern renaissance of metaphysical idealism, the notion that reality is essentially mental.
He has a Ph.D. in philosophy (ontology, philosophy of mind) and another Ph.D. in computer engineering (reconfigurable computing, artificial intelligence).
A brief overview of his work in the form of a catechism is:
Materialism vs Idealism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uArSolZX19U
and Top 10 Fallacies of Materialism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m7BxlWlvzc
TIMES & TOPICS
00:00:00 Introduction
00:02:34 Bernardo's journey from materialism to idealism
00:07:08 Materialism vs Analytical idealism
00:14:03 Dissociative identity disorder (multiple personality disorder) and consciousness
00:19:20 Why does life has a separate consciousness and not, say, a rock?
00:29:14 What does it mean to "explain" without reductionism?
00:30:25 Why not start with "nothing"? What would a theory like that look like?
00:32:15 What does it mean to "exist"? Do abstractions exist?
00:35:53 Theories of "truth" other than correspondence
00:47:56 Randomness doesn't exist fundamentally
00:51:05 If the mind is deceptive then what do we trust?
00:57:44 Is "Mind At Large" God? Can you pray to it?
01:01:07 Morality and purpose
01:08:12 On disagreements with Joscha Bach
01:12:30 On disagreements with Daniel Dennett
01:17:37 On disagreements with Dawkins
01:19:43 On disagreements with Douglas Hofstadter
01:36:18 If everything is "in the mind" then why are objects independently verified and exert an influence when I'm gone?
01:38:56 On disagreements with Donald Hoffman and Thomas Campbell
01:44:01 The distinction between "in your head" and "in your mind" is crucial
01:54:39 On disagreements with Carl Jung
01:57:44 On disagreements with Roger Penrose
01:59:56 Why parsimony in assumptions? Why not many assumptions?
02:06:52 Curt says Bernardo's theory isn't better than the Flying Spaghetti Monster
02:13:48 On Schopenhauer
02:19:30 How to properly read Jung
02:25:11 Bernardo and Curt speak about the "new age" and "woo"
02:31:00 On Deepak Chopra
02:36:53 Does Bernardo fear death? (a story about ego death)
02:49:17 If this reality is a "dream", how much can we control it?
02:54:29 Choice, free will, and becoming a slave voluntarily
02:56:40 The intellect is a bouncer of the heart
02:58:08 The East vs the West have different answers to the suffering of life
03:02:20 The "self" is an illusion worth saving
03:06:02 Bernardo almost killed himself twice, and later found meaning in the suffering
03:10:14 On the pain of writing
03:15:59 Should you ever regret? (Buddhism vs Christianity)
03:20:39 If consciousness is all there is, and the self is an illusion, why did the East get that and not the West?
03:25:48 Can you have morality / ethics within materialism?
03:26:59 What's the weakest point of Bernardo's model?
03:28:25 Is there anything special about biological life?
03:34:36 Logic
03:36:27 What beats rationality? What's the "game of all games"?
03:45:33 How does Bernardo write? What's the process look like?
03:51:19 Bernardo gives Curt advice
04:03:51 Don't feel like "others have it worse." Honor your suffering.
04:06:22 Don't take yourself seriously but take life seriously
04:07:59 Disagreements with Tony Robbins and self-help
04:15:00 Brain as a radio tuner (Plastic Pears)
04:24:29 How to falsify Bernardo's theory? What predictions does his model make?
04:27:29 Other audience questions
04:29:31 The relationship between universal consciousness and the Platonic Realm (Sessaly)
04:33:57 These metaphysical questions are dangerous questions
The Self, and the Connectedness of You and I
Bernardo Kastrup has been leading the modern renaissance of metaphysical idealism, the notion that reality is essentially mental.
He has a Ph.D. in philosophy (ontology, philosophy of mind) and another Ph.D. in computer engineering (reconfigurable computing, artificial intelligence).
A brief overview of his work in the form of a catechism is:
Materialism vs Idealism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uArSolZX19U
and Top 10 Fallacies of Materialism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m7BxlWlvzc
TIMES & TOPICS
00:00:00 Introduction
00:02:34 Bernardo's journey from materialism to idealism
00:07:08 Materialism vs Analytical idealism
00:14:03 Dissociative identity disorder (multiple personality disorder) and consciousness
00:19:20 Why does life has a separate consciousness and not, say, a rock?
00:29:14 What does it mean to "explain" without reductionism?
00:30:25 Why not start with "nothing"? What would a theory like that look like?
00:32:15 What does it mean to "exist"? Do abstractions exist?
00:35:53 Theories of "truth" other than correspondence
00:47:56 Randomness doesn't exist fundamentally
00:51:05 If the mind is deceptive then what do we trust?
00:57:44 Is "Mind At Large" God? Can you pray to it?
01:01:07 Morality and purpose
01:08:12 On disagreements with Joscha Bach
01:12:30 On disagreements with Daniel Dennett
01:17:37 On disagreements with Dawkins
01:19:43 On disagreements with Douglas Hofstadter
01:36:18 If everything is "in the mind" then why are objects independently verified and exert an influence when I'm gone?
01:38:56 On disagreements with Donald Hoffman and Thomas Campbell
01:44:01 The distinction between "in your head" and "in your mind" is crucial
01:54:39 On disagreements with Carl Jung
01:57:44 On disagreements with Roger Penrose
01:59:56 Why parsimony in assumptions? Why not many assumptions?
02:06:52 Curt says Bernardo's theory isn't better than the Flying Spaghetti Monster
02:13:48 On Schopenhauer
02:19:30 How to properly read Jung
02:25:11 Bernardo and Curt speak about the "new age" and "woo"
02:31:00 On Deepak Chopra
02:36:53 Does Bernardo fear death? (a story about ego death)
02:49:17 If this reality is a "dream", how much can we control it?
02:54:29 Choice, free will, and becoming a slave voluntarily
02:56:40 The intellect is a bouncer of the heart
02:58:08 The East vs the West have different answers to the suffering of life
03:02:20 The "self" is an illusion worth saving
03:06:02 Bernardo almost killed himself twice, and later found meaning in the suffering
03:10:14 On the pain of writing
03:15:59 Should you ever regret? (Buddhism vs Christianity)
03:20:39 If consciousness is all there is, and the self is an illusion, why did the East get that and not the West?
03:25:48 Can you have morality / ethics within materialism?
03:26:59 What's the weakest point of Bernardo's model?
03:28:25 Is there anything special about biological life?
03:34:36 Logic
03:36:27 What beats rationality? What's the "game of all games"?
03:45:33 How does Bernardo write? What's the process look like?
03:51:19 Bernardo gives Curt advice
04:03:51 Don't feel like "others have it worse." Honor your suffering.
04:06:22 Don't take yourself seriously but take life seriously
04:07:59 Disagreements with Tony Robbins and self-help
04:15:00 Brain as a radio tuner (Plastic Pears)
04:24:29 How to falsify Bernardo's theory? What predictions does his model make?
04:27:29 Other audience questions
04:29:31 The relationship between universal consciousness and the Platonic Realm (Sessaly)
04:33:57 These metaphysical questions are dangerous questions
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
They only function when open.