Sandy Hook Shootings Investigation Latest

[skinters]

I look at those believing in it being a 'hoax'...as in all of them were actors or it was some sort of grand drill.

Why?

FFS mate your reading what im saying as wrong.

Sandy hook is called a hoax by many including yourself,

.


As far as I can see it was a hoax at the fire station not even the school, some very bad acting by the parents and such (gun control advocates etc). With no dead bodies. So as there are no dead bodies, as at least proof that something really did happen then its just like a film set and acting hoax.

I'm trying to get my head around this all 'hoax' thing and what it really mean in the way its meant.

This is my line,

The lanzas were set up as patsies.Multiple shooters were involved.

The scene was then infiltrated to divert and confuse. Real responders were then further confused and led right down that pipe....thats it until i am convinced otherwise, and until i am seeing something solid to contradict that line of thought thats my main look on it.

[Andrew]

FFS mate your reading what im saying as wrong.

No need for that, and its very wrong of you to say what you have said about.

I look at those believing in it being a 'hoax'...as in all of them were actors or it was some sort of grand drill.

I was looking at it in the way YOU thinking it was all done with actors

How do you know that what you have asserted twice now, what people think. Even when its been pointed out to you by me as not believing what you assert. As not believing as you asserted.

I.E.

I don't think that and I don't think others who see it as a hoax think they were all actors (in on it; just a few).

Other than in the the way:

"Just like a regular fire drill, it involves all the people in the whole building, but most of the people would be none the wiser if it was a drill or real a real fire. Until what they are told afterwards.

If they were sent home and told not to return because there was a fire and it damaged some chemical tank (a hoax). How many would have to be in on that, even if it was a building with thousands of people."

It gets reported that it "happened", it will be cleared up next week and the workers return to work. No ones none the wiser.

Simple type of trick.

I just can't see how you think that all those people involved in the scenario above would have to be in on it.

This is my line,

The lanzas were set up as patsies.Multiple shooters were involved.

The scene was then infiltrated to divert and confuse. Real responders were then further confused and led right down that pipe....thats it until i am convinced otherwise, and until i am seeing something solid to contradict that line of thought thats my main look on it.

That's fine but I don't believe that, and I wont tell you what you and others think, unlike you.

You may be right and I may be right we may both be wrong.

But I have seen no proof and IMHO it was a hoax.

[skinters]

FFS mate your reading what im saying as wrong.

No need for that, and its very wrong of you to say what you have said about.

I look at those believing in it being a 'hoax'...as in all of them were actors or it was some sort of grand drill.

I was looking at it in the way YOU thinking it was all done with actors

How do you know that what you have asserted twice now, what people think. Even when its been pointed out to you by me as not believing what you assert. As not believing as you asserted.

I'm seriously starting to think you have infiltrated the forum to divert and confuse lol...just kidding mate.

Why is it wrong for me not to believe that i think the hoax line came about by people believing it was all done by actors.

I think it was that Robbie parker smiling that spurned the actor/ hoax theory.

Like 9/11 i do believe that there were maybe some actors involved, but thats it nothing more.

[skinters]

That's fine but I don't believe that, and I wont tell you what you and others think, unlike you.

I will continue to TELL other people what i think and how my personal view on it is.

I don't want to prove you wrong or debunk anything your saying.

We both know that something is not right and will hopefully meet at the end of it with something solid we both can agree on.

[Andrew]

Why is it wrong for me not to believe that i think the hoax line came about by people believing it was all done by actors.

Because they don't all necessarily think all the people involved in the drill type scenario were in on it actors. Just those few who would have to be in on it.

I don't think that and I don't think others who see it as a hoax think they were all actors (in on it; just a few).

Other than in the the way:

"Just like a regular fire drill, it involves all the people in the whole building, but most of the people would be none the wiser if it was a drill or real a real fire. Until what they are told afterwards.

If they were sent home and told not to return because there was a fire and it damaged some chemical tank (a hoax). How many would have to be in on that, even if it was a building with thousands of people."

It gets reported that it "happened", it will be cleared up next week and the workers return to work. No ones none the wiser.

Simple type of trick.

[skinters]

Because they don't all necessarily think all the people involved in the drill type scenario were in on it actors. Just those few who would have to be in on it.

Well you only have to look on youtube and the first viral video that pretty much started it,

Sandy Hook "Fully Exposed"

and the multitude of 'actors' videos etc.

The Belief there is that ALL the parents were actors.

[Andrew]

Because they don't all necessarily think all the people involved in the drill type scenario were in on it actors. Just those few who would have to be in on it.

Well you only have to look on youtube and the first viral video that pretty much started it,

Sandy Hook "Fully Exposed"

and the multitude of 'actors' videos etc.

The Belief there is that ALL the parents were actors.

There would have had to have been a few in on it actors but not that many. (taking it that it was a hoax).

How many parents have said they lost their own children and have been interviewed? Not that many.

I was looking at it in the way YOU thinking it was all done with actors

I don't think that and I don't think others who see it as a hoax think they were all actors (in on it; just a few).

Other than in the the way:

"Just like a regular fire drill, it involves all the people in the whole building, but most of the people would be none the wiser if it was a drill or real a real fire. Until what they are told afterwards.

If they were sent home and told not to return because there was a fire and it damaged some chemical tank (a hoax). How many would have to be in on that, even if it was a building with thousands of people."

It gets reported that it "happened", it will be cleared up next week and the workers return to work. No ones none the wiser.

Simple type of trick.

[skinters]

There would have had to have been a few in on it actors but not that many. (taking it that it was a hoax).

Swap actors for cia/ fed then yeah i would go along with that line.

This acting thing just don't fit with me...the whole wording of it...'acting', 'hoax' etc.

Mostly because its so centered around the whole sandy theory.

I feel coerced into following the herd and i dont like it.

I think that even one actor would alert real people in the area...real parents of the school....like eh ? ...i dont know who the fuck that is.

[Andrew]

Swap actors for cia/ fed then yeah i would go along with that line.

Politically motivated people are many.

I think that even one actor would alert real people in the area...real parents of the school....like eh ? ...i dont know who the fuck that is.

You never lived somewhere for a while and realise that you don't know many of the neighbours.


Apparently all the "victims" had something in common in that they had only been there for a couple of years or so.

I feel coerced into following the herd and i dont like it.

I think the herd believe as the TV says so.

And your statement works both ways.

You also have a bad habit of telling people what they believe and telling others what they others believe.

[skinters]

You never lived somewhere for a while and realise that you don't know many of the neighbours.

I know everyone in my kids school, and well you aint met my neigbours.Some of the old dears are proper curtain twitcher's.

Especially small towns...everyone knows everyone.

Apparently all the "victims" had something in common in that they had only been there for a couple of years or so.

Ok lets look at that properly...have you a link or anything so i can check that out for myself.

I think the herd believe as the TV says so.

And also the internet.

Dont think for a second that the internet is not used like TV where certain people want you to follow a particular way of thinking.

You also have a bad habit of telling people what they believe and telling others what they others believe.

No.

I'm only saying how i think it went down to which i'm entitled to do.

You can believe what you like, but i am trying to back up what i say with at least something more than what was picked up from youtube.

Attack the message not the messenger.

[skinters]

double

[Andrew]

No.

I'm only saying how i think it went down to which i'm entitled to do.

Wrong, you even told me what I think and when I pointed it out I don't you still carried on with it.

I know everyone in my kids school, and well you aint met my neigbours.Some of the old dears are proper curtain twitcher's.

Especially small towns...everyone knows everyone.

I didn't when my kids went to school.

And also the internet.

Dont think for a second that the internet is not used like TV where certain people want you to follow a particular way of thinking.

Stop part quoting me.