A CUBED IO-SPHERE
CREATES THE WORLD
Breakthrough discovery of an Inside-Out Universe!

"You cannot solve a problem on the same level that it was created.
You must rise above it to the next level." --Albert Einstein

  

Eureka! The underlying form of
our universe is a mirrored, oscillating IO-Sphere, which turns inside-out, then outside-in, at light cubed speed

[ Full Detail Animation ]

We are on the mirrored skin of this IO-Sphere.
Inside the sphere is mind. Outside is matter.
An inside-out oscillation of this vast sphere
blends mind with matter to make space-time.
That sphere is our planet Earth.

  9th October 2003
  by Fintan Dunne,
   Author: TreeIncarnation.com

" Oh Eye See " O everts to I, inverts to O, at C cubed Simplified as: Zero Cubed = One Definition: Reality is an oscillating sphere, which everts and inverts; to blend mind and matter into space-time Eversion produces the explicate chaos of matter. Inversion produces the implicate order of the mind. Every wave crest is an eversion and every trough is an inversion. The equation can be loosely stated as: " Oh See Eye " Note: Though C is stated here in conventional meters per second, it is more a function that a mere speed. Internet radio interview with Alex Merklinger on Mysteries of the Mind, about the IO-Sphere LISTEN Media Player Advance your player 1 hour 6 minutes into the show where the interview starts. At the time this article is published, scientists are looking at spherical universe ideas. I disagree with the conclusions of this interesting article below. CNN: Scientists think universe shaped like soccer ball A new study suggests the cosmos could be dodecahedral, or 12 spherical pentagons tiled together on a sphere. NATURE: The Universe could be shaped like a soccer ball, say mathematicians. by JOHN WHITFIELD Nature: 9 Oct 2003 NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite... sees back to when the Universe was about 380,000 years old, and reveals the all-pervading radiation left over from the Big Bang - the cosmic microwave background. There are fluctuations in this background, like waves in the sea. They are the legacy of the small lumps in the early Universe that gave rise to stars and galaxies. An infinite Universe would contain waves of all sizes. The WMAP did not see any very large waves. This points to space being finite - for the same reasons that you don't see breakers in your bathtub. The best explanation for these observations is that the cosmos is a Poincaré dodecahedral space, says a team led by Jeffrey Weeks, an independent mathematician based in Canton, New York. Mathematical models of a spherical, solid Universe edged by 12 curved pentagons produce the patterns seen in the background radiation without any special fine-tuning. "It fits the data surprisingly well," says Weeks. The dodecahedron is "a nice solution", agrees cosmologist Janna Levin of the University of Cambridge, UK. But other geometries could produce similar patterns in the microwave background, she warns. Most physicists assume that the Universe is infinite, explains Levin. But Einstein's theories actually say nothing about whether the Universe stops or not. A journey of 60 billion light years across a dodecahedral Universe would bring you right back to Earth. Like a circumnavigation of the globe, it would be a seamless ride: there would be no obvious point at which one 're-entered' the Universe. FULL ARTICLE Nature, 425, 593 - 595, doi:10.1038/nature01944 (2003). [ Article Abstract ] © Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2003 "Our psyche is set up in accord with the structure of the universe, and what happens in the macrocosm likewise happens in the infinitesimal and most subjective reaches of the psyche." Carl G. Jung 'Memories, Dreams, Reflections' - Vintage, 1963 - page 335. "Psyche and matter exist in one and the same world, and each partakes of the other.. If research could only advance far enough, therefore, we should arrive at an ultimate agreement between physical and psychological concepts." Carl G. Jung 'Aion' - Princeton University Press, 1959 - page 261. "Understanding dark energy will be crucial to finding a final, unified picture of physics." Saul Perlmutter, Supernova Cosmology Project Sept. 16, 2003 "It is this unifying Self of a collective unconscious that can be hypothesized as the unexplored source of an inconceivable energy for change - the psychic equivalent of Einstein's E=MC2." James W. Douglass Lightning East to West, The Crossword Publishing Company, New York, 1984, ISBN 0-8245-0587-5. " The sphere and the cube together represent Knowledge, Beauty and Life. The sphere predominantly corresponds with the feelings or heart, (affective) and the cube to thought and intellect (cognitive). Universal Harmonics Cube Sphere Analysis ASSOCIATED LINKS Wolfram Science Synergetics Fusion Anomaly Holotropic Musical Expanding Dark Energy Universal Scale

This breakthrough uncovers what Carl Jung called "the ultimate agreement between physical and psychological concepts." It is of such Copernican scope that once you fully grasp it, your world view will change instantly and forever.

The discovery of a mind-matter link puts humanity again at the center of the universe, before modern scientific materialism demoted us to being mere accidental specks in the vast firmament.

The reason it has taken so long to discover this fundamental structure of the universe is the same impediment which prevented Greco-Roman Europe from determining that the Earth revolved around the sun.

What hampered astronomers other than Copernicus and Gallileo is that they were looking through the wrong paradigm --not only rendering a solution impossible, but even preventing consideration of any alternative paradigm by force of intellectual habit.

This breakthrough is also a new paradigm. It too will be dismissed or even ridiculed by some. But there are good reasons why this new paradigm will find acceptance.

It comes in an era when a great many have been searching for link between mind and matter --with much groundwork already done. And it comes at a time when new puzzles about so-called dark matter and dark energy have been compounded by the recent discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe. These conundrums have undermined current theory in a more fundamental way than the retrograde motions of planets undermined the geocentric model of the middle ages. All this is fertile ground for the seed of a new paradigm.

Indeed in a quirky coincidence, new research published today in the journal Nature confirms that the new paradigm is well founded.

Mathematician Jeffrey Weeks (et. al.) posits a model based on a spherical universe, whose topology is like a soccer ball with 12 curved pentagons forming the sphere. The model fits to patterns in the background cosmic radiation detected by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe satellite.

I was unaware of this work, and my model is much wider in scope --the Weeks model refers only to the material worl, with no reference to the mind. But it certainly helps to have confirmation that the gross structure of the universe is spherical.

Weeks et. al. have met mixed reaction to their new model, but the Cubed-IO-Sphere model you are reading about here places their work in a valid context.

Perhaps, after all, it is time for a paradigm shift of universal scope.

OVERLOOKING THE
MILDLY NON-OBVIOUS

We are not purely biological. Our minds are no mere artifact of biological electronics. We are the source and destination of the universe. The materialist bias is anathema to further progress in science. It is a dead-end paradigm to be swept aside.

And there are are a few more intellectual rocks to be rolled aside so that a new understanding may emerge.

Like this one: "The sun and moon are exactly the same size when observed from Earth, but this is just a fantastic coincidence." Big mistake. Probably the biggest error science has made. This is the most glaring misaphrension of modern science.

There is only one planet (as far as we know), from which the view of it's Sun and Moon appear equivalent. This one: Earth. Ignoring the gross improbability of such a solar:lunar equivalence does not make it go away.

Neither can we we simply ignore the discovery by Louis Pasteur of a mysterious biological anomaly. Inorganic crystals and molecules are found in two mirror image forms. These mirror images exist in equal measure --adhering to the inexorable laws of probability.

However, Pasteur found that in living tissues, amino acid populations are entirely of one mirror image only. Amino acids in tissues invariably have a left-handed twist. That's like tossing a coin and having it improbably come up heads every single time. In other words, impossible.

Third, we cannot ignore the implicit mirror plane running down the center of all higher lifeforms on Earth. Every human is a walking mirror plane. Our right is a mirror of our left. Why? The answer is tied to Pasteur's mysterious discovery.

Improbable solar:lunar equivalence. Improbable amino acids in life. An unexplained mirror plane in our bodies. These are key clues which science has overlooked. Suppose one explanation linked and resolved all of these and triggered a 'Eureka' moment?

Some hints: What if the solar:lunar equivalence implies that sun and moon are meant to be observed from Earth! What if the handedness of amino acids implies that God is left-handed! What if our bodily mirror plane implies that there is an implicit mirror plane in everything!

This Cubed IO-Sphere model resolves many intractable knots in existing theories of creation and the nature of reality. Some major theoretical trends plug into the model to find an explanatory home.

The new model explains dark matter and dark energy. It accounts for antimatter and time reversal. The model reconciles mind with matter; and God with science.

Eur--eeee-ka!


THROUGH THE
LOOKING GLASS

The mirror plane is key to all this (see earlier work). We all take mirrors far too much for granted. So, let's follow Alice and Neo through the mirror. It's past time we examined mirrors very closely.

It is a workable hypothesis that mirrors exchange left and right. After all, our own reflections in a mirror are oppositely handed: raise your left hand before a mirror and your image raises it's right hand.

But this simplistic left:right understanding is undone when you wonder why top and bottom are not exchanged in the same manner as left and right. Get a mirror; try it and think about it. Mirrors do not simply exchange left and right. Which is why they fail to swap top and bottom.

First mirror axiom: Mirrors turn things inside out. We can simply demonstrate: Put a lightweight clear plastic surgical glove on your right hand. Now place your gloved fingertips against a mirror. A gloved left hand appears in the mirror, seeming to touch your gloved right hand.

Now, leave the mirror aside and bring your two hands together so that fingertips and thumbs of both hands are touching. The appearance is very similar to that in the mirror --but in the real world your left hand is ungloved.

Still pressing your fingertips together, ask a third party to peel the glove off your right hand and draw it over your left. In the process the glove turns inside out. You have performed a mirror operation on it. Mirrors turn things inside out.

Second mirror axiom: A physically flat mirror is cognitively a curved surface. We can illustrate by first examining the converse of this:

The converse is true of any lake (Earth's natural mirror surface). A small area of the still surface of a lake cognitively seems to be flat. But as the Earth itself is curved, these natural lake mirrors are actually physically curved surfaces. Like the Earth itself, they only appear flat locally.

Now conversely, man-made mirrors are physically flat surfaces which, we assert, are actually cognitively curved. Every flat mirror is cognitively curved.

Hold on, you say, It sure doesn't look curved. Yes, but recall that lakes are cognitively flat, but truly curved, so be prepared to accept that a mirror is truly flat but cognitively curved.

This axiom must seem curious. It is certainly intriguing. Is there really a converse relationship between natural water-mirrors and man-made ones. Any, if so, why?

But, we haven't proven all this yet. I am just asserting it in this axiom. The next axiom will elaborate. We are getting close now.

Third mirror axiom: All mirrors are curved surface sections of a single cognitive sphere.

Take all the mirrors in the world. Lay them on the ground --face up-- by the millions, all over the globe. Now you see where I am headed with the axiom that each mirror is cognitively curved.

Imagine all the mirrors growing larger, until their edges just touch to form a vast curved surface. We have created a single spherical global mirror.

Now shrink the mirrors again and return them to their places on walls, in handbags or attached to windscreens. They are once again independent surfaces, but rest assured the underlying reality is that every mirror is a view into a common cognitive sphere.

Each of us imagines that the reflections we see in mirrors are private creations. They are not. No person has ever had such a private view. Every single glance into a mirror is an individual view into a collective interior cognitive space. Let's examine that space.

Fourth mirror axiom: The far side of a mirror is a concept zone of pure forms. Here are some mental exercises which serve to demonstrate:

First: Take a hand mirror and see how it reflects the room you are in right now. Carefully scan the appearance of that mirror room and commit the view to your memory. Now place the mirror face down on a surface, or even in a drawer. Where has the mirror room gone?

Second: Imagine that one wall of the room you are in right now, has a wall to wall, floor to ceiling mirror. Note the appearance of the mirror room. Now leave the room you are in. When you are absent the room, does the mirror room exist?

Just as a bicycle or a mousetrap are concept, a room is itself a concept. It is a living space concept, developed by humans. So, even if the "reflections" still somehow exist in the room you just left, without sentience to observe them they are just a jumble of physics mingled with the obscure mathematics of photons. Meaning is as absent as you are.

Now try another exercise: As you look into a hand mirror, twist and jerk it in your hand, causing the mirror room to sway and veer wildly. The mirror room is weightless and has no inertia. It is pure form with no substance.

As stated: the other side of a mirror is a concept zone of pure forms. These forms emerge from the simplicity of Zero and One and extend into awesome complexity by harmonic musicality counterpointed against discordance. It's that simple in essence.

Many a brilliant invention has crossed the mirror plane, out of that concept zone, and into our side of the mirror where jets fly, turbines hum and mousetraps snap.

Some inventions, such as Internet browsers, even manage to make it back across the mirror plane again into the concept zone. Here they render web pages like this virtual article you are now reading.

Fifth mirror axiom: Mirrors are portholes into the individual mind, the collective mind and thus the mind of God.

Putting previous axioms together, we see that a mirror is a view into a collective interior cognitive space of pure forms. In other words: a mind. The surface of this mind-space (the surface of the mirror) is the conscious mind --the view seen by the observer. Inside, is a group mind that has both unconscious and superconscious aspects. Inside, is the domain of instant form. Consciousness is the surface of the Sphere. The volume inside is One Mind, out of which forms evert; to which all forms r-evert.

<< Click the graphic at left
to view this eversion/inversion

"It returns to nothingness.
The form of the formless,
The image of the imageless," -Tao Te Ching


The Sphere everts, inverts, everts, inverts. It everts to manifest,
then inverts in the observation of the manifestation (thinks), then manifests again.

The inner forms, evert out across a mirror plane. Where, the mind's I finds itself within a Cartesian perceptual reality. What was first cognized as pure form, has everted into manifestation. A Sphere eversion creates an Identity in a world of manifested forms. It creates the I within the world. Then observation re-cognizes what was manifest. Re-cognition is the inversion of the Sphere.

"Ever desireless, one can see the mystery.
Ever desiring, one sees the manifestations
These two spring from the same source." -Tao Te Ching

Final Exercise: Imagine a friend hands you one a puzzle pictures where a figure of some sort is concealed. "What can you see?" asks your friend enigmatically. You look and look. Eventually you see hidden pattern in the ink.

Question: Where was the hidden pattern before you saw it. It was certainly in the mind of your friend, but not in yours.

Let's make the question harder by saying that this picture was formed accidentally when some ink spilled on a paper card. Before the first person ever observed the hidden figure, where was the pattern?

Did the pattern exist at all?
And is the pattern in the mind or on the card?

If the two of you are the only ones to observe it, does it exist at all some two hundred years later when the card is lying forgotten somewhere?

Answer: In fact, the pattern is neither in the card nor the mind. The pattern is the act of observation itself.

The mind is inside the IO-Sphere and the material world is outside.

The pattern of life --our very reality--
is in neither. It is in that which separates and defines the two. The pattern is on the skin of the sphere. Just as life on Earth is found on the skin surface of the planet. Life exists on boundaries. In the observation.


In the figure on the right, the mirror is an explicit plane
arising from the implicit mirror present in everything.


CUBING THE GOD SPHERE

We have modeled the universe as an everting/inverting IO-Sphere. The model had a clear topographical, mathematical explanatory capacity, expressed consistent with symbols and language.

' Eye-Oh-Sphere' means: reality structure of sight and sound, by means of movement across membrane.

I = Eye = a vision of a planar universe.
O = Oh = a rounded mouth vibrating sound of vowel.
Sphere = the skin of the body; the membrane of the cellular level. Containment: the basis of life.

The next article (soon) will examine exactly how all this works and specifically where the cube/planar surface comes in. You contain the universe. Our analysis has --pardon the pun--- so far but scratched the surface...


END PART 1: A Cubed IO-Sphere Creates the World
SEE PART 2: Sphere Eversion: Oscillating the Whole Universe
& SEE ALSO: The Mirror Mind of the Cyclic Universe

Fintan Dunne, 9th October, 2003
Copyright © TreeIncarnation.com

To join in an online forum
developing these ideas, email the author.

To get notification by email
of forthcoming articles, click here.

URL:   http://www.TreeIncarnation.com/inside-out-universe.htm

AS ABOVE --SO BELOW               Star from Rough Diamond For every Root in Hyperspace, there is a Branch in Space: a Star. For every Branch in the Mind, there is a Root in Hyperspace: a Concept. For every Branch in the Tree, there is a Root in the Earth: a Family. For every Root in the Earth, there is a Branch in Time: a Person.