FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Other Collapses in Perspective

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps General Investigation
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
Jimbo



Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 462

PostPosted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:08 am    Post subject: Other Collapses in Perspective Reply with quote

I can't find your post Fintan but a while back you showed how fire could soften and or melt so much that a steel structure could collapse and you illustrated that with a pic of an oil tanker truck that blazed beneath a bridge and then the bridge collapsed. I went along with your argument then. It made sense but the article I am posting below says you were probably wrong because your bridge and its collapse is nothing at all like how the buildings fell on 9/11.

Other Collapses in Perspective: An Examination of Steel Structures Collapsing due to Fire and their Relation to the WTC

by Adam Taylor, contributing writer for http://www.ae911truth.org and http://911debunkers.blogspot.com

One of the arguments that has been raised over the years by members of the 9/11 Truth Movement in regards to the collapse of the three WTC buildings is that, if the official story is correct, they were the first steel-framed high-rise skyscrapers in history to collapse because of fire. Indeed, in all of the history of structural engineering, not a single steel-framed skyscraper has ever totally collapsed due to fire.[1] However, in an attempt to invalidate this argument, numerous supporters of the official story of 9/11 have pointed out that there are several smaller steel structures that have collapsed due to fire. Journalist Chris Mohr, for example, cited numerous steel structures in his debate with architect Richard Gage.[2] The following are the most often cited steel structures that have collapsed due to fire (Chris Mohr referenced the first six in his debate with Richard Gage):

 Sight and Sound Theater (1/28/1987)  McCormick Place (1/16/1967)  Kader Toy Factory (5/10/1993)  Mumbai High North Platform (7/27/2005)  Interstate 580 (4/29/2007)
 World Trade Center 5 (9/11/2001)  Dogwood Elementary School (11/27/2000)  Windsor Tower (2/12/2005)  Faculty of Architecture Building (5/13/2008)

It will be demonstrated why these structures cannot be justifiably used as comparisons to the WTC buildings, based on the estimated damage parameters and fire severity for these structures.

http://www.scientificmethod911.org/docs/Other_Collapses_Apr27_2013.pdf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
psikeyhackr



Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A 3D model of WTC1 could be built like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INPLp5h0EEQ

It could be built one or more levels at a time so the complete stack would be 13 ft 9 inches. Some printers have a precision of less than 1/1000th of an inch so hollow box columns could be made with walls of varying thickness.

But columns could be tested for strength to be as weak as possible relative the the weight and the structure could be weighted to have the same distribution as the WTC. IF WE EVER GOT THE DATA. It could then be tested for complete collapse and the 3D diagrams could be sent all over the world and the tests repeated by anyone with the equipment to produce the components.

So if it won’t collapse even if designed to be as weak as possible then what was the story on 9/11?

But that would present a problem for all of the people who have said collapse was possible for 12 years.

Experimentation is so unscientific.

[]
psik

_________________
Physics is Phutile
Fiziks is Fundamental
Since 9/11 physics is history
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
psikeyhackr



Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 1:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In 1940 a model of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge was built in a few months to eliminate the aerodynamic problem. But the bridge collapsed first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB008RAluyg

But in 12 years we don't have a model of the north tower collapse.

Very curious that! Twisted Evil

psik

_________________
Physics is Phutile
Fiziks is Fundamental
Since 9/11 physics is history
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps General Investigation All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.