Depleted uranium use is a war crime

[Southpark Fan]

The list of crimes knows no end....

The individuals responsible for the execution of war plans for gulf 1 and W Bush's criminal escapades must face international justice. The names are easy to find. The evidence is easy to find. Victims are everywhere.

Then, for all of those found guilty, immediate publically televised (over and over and over....) executions for said war crimes. These individuals are a clear and present danger to OUR way of life HERE on earth!

No mercy...


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[noplacebo]

damn right it is, but it is also these same perpetrators whom administer war crimes trials towards their own ends, and in these times of uncertainty, the rampant stampede of sanctioned unbridled greed, see's just how ingenious the human disregard of life, in pursuit of profit, can be stretched. these are new times, anything is possible, nothing is sancrosanct, our own democratic rights are nowadays only for show,we must try to see the situation from the point of view of our own benevolent handlers ,.... listen, never mind some dictator run terrorist state that is a geopolitical and national security risk, we must look on this as an opportunity, we can sell a highly toxic waste product at an exhorbinate price, and use the product to help rid us of our problem and hamper any future demographics from emerging at the same time. a totally brilliant idea if you are a coldhearted, detached psychopath, whom has no compassion whatsoever outside of their own interests.

[Southpark Fan]

I agree.

Psychopaths can still do major time or dangle from a rope.

[IronClad]

Hans Blix did not "clear" Iraq from possessing chemical and/or biological weapons.

Whilst inspecting Iraq for nuclear weapons it is hard to accept that chem/bio material would have not been found.

The US troops were provided with chem/bio suits. And we are led to believe that either during the bombing chem/bio facilities/supplies were bombed knowingly or unknowingly and/or afterwards any left over where knowingly blownup.

There was a 12 year no fly-zone and sanctions on Iraq and yet the threat of bio/chem weapons remained even after Hans Blix had done his stuff.

The troops were given a cocktail of drugs - what were these drugs? Experiemental or tried and tested drugs?

Have these drugs been eleminated from the cause of GWS? Has the good guys eleminated this cocktail of inoculations from the cause of GWS?

Questions need answers because the good guys support the official story that chem/bio weapons material remained in Iraq undetected until bombing when they miraculously turned up underneath bomb drops or miracously found afterwards surviving weapons inspections and bomb drops and needed destruction afterward.

This situation is not plausible. The government can handle this low-level controversy and at any time they can come out and say it - that chem/bio weapons material remained in Iraq right up to the time it was finally blown up. Up to the time when these good guys say the troops were contaminated. They don't need to come out and say it because the good guys are saying it for them.

Have you seen the Green Zone with Matt Damon? His troop were lead around chasing WMD and turned up blank.

The bottom line is has the good guys ruled out the coocktail of drugs the troops were given? They have to find them to be harmless and for that they need a sample of those drugs and long term tests the results of which could have been available by now.

Learning to undo trust of folk is a long process and may never be achieved. Trusting an "opposition" is always the easiest to learn.

[Rom]

"Learning to undo trust of folk is a long process"

Exactly

When you have friends that are glued to telly every day you don't just tell them that the ancorman is a liar. They trust him and they trust the channel (let's say BBC)

And BBC knows that, whenever they are caught in lying they will lengthy explain how the "mishap" occured, and tell how much effort they put into getting every details "right" (while they make outragous lies).

The confidence game is so important for them, they need the trust, otherwise the game will not work. We have to take that trust away from those liars. It does not have to be 911-talk, it can be about any "facts" they present.

[Southpark Fan]

[IronClad]

Prior to watching the above video I thought it might be worth checking out some of the articles on the subject.

Rather than being native Americans [Indians] where it would be a matter of nationality this probably should read "Indiana" reservists where it would be a specific destribution of the drugs.

But anyway, here is evidence that they were experimental drugs.


http://www.staytuned.ws/articles/gulfwar.html

Army physicians investigating the initial breakout among Indian reservists concluded that the vets were suffering from “stress,” perhaps caused by readjustment back into civilian life.

soldier’s lawsuit was dismissed by U.S. District Judge Stanley S. Harris. The judge cited the necessity of the military to protect the health of its troops; the fact that the vaccines and drugs were untested and unapproved by the FDA was deemed irrelevant.

[IronClad]

What do you expect from Corporate America?
Do you expect them to innoculate troops for no reason. Why mass test drugs when they could have controlled isolated testing?
Why use depleted Uranium shells to pierce armour where other conventional shells will do? Why risk more people dying and the controversy afterwards which is far worse than any armoured tank ever do.
Choice:-

(A) R&D military hardware testing - drug and DU testing for mass slaughter on ethnic grounds or some other selective body composition?

(B) Destruction of moral or physical destruction of the military?

(C) Just a gungho stupidity?

(D) An agenda of some wacko religious ideology?

What benefit does Corporate America get out of this?

See through the disgust and the drama and the psyop - what do you see?

What you see is American troops still fighting and you see the military top brass staying silent. What you see is the politicians involved living to a ripe old age and even writing their memoirs.

What you see is Arnold who can command the American army, plan battles and win them, who claims he did not know what markings were on crates so he gave the go ahead for them to be blown up - expecting them not to contain chemical or biological weapons and yet not having any advisers to tell him one way or the other - getting away with such nonsense.

So what you see is people in power acting hung ho and stupid - selling a lot of waste Uranium and selling all sorts of chemical and bioweaponry to Iraq during the good times [might call it a trade war] when the majority of the oil reserves in the planet are in that part of the world.

It doesn't make sense, does it?

But what does make sense?

It is not what is happening "on the ground". This has to be seen from way above [from 30,000' according to President Obama] from the view of our controllers.

We think small scale when we should being viewing this on a much larger scale.

Psychopaths, lets them off the hook.

[atm]

Depleted uranium, being used as a weapon?

Say it ain't so.

not ed

atm

[leon]

Theoretically, warheads made of depleted uranium make for projectiles with better penetration capability due to high density of uranium to be used against hardened targets (tanks and such)

However, I suspect there is some other agenda being pushed here since the use of that warheads will pollute the environment with low grade, but very long term radiation that will have a lasting effect on health of local population and own troops alike.

That is Nuremberg material.

[IronClad]

Oh, I forgot. The main contributer to this documentary who was given the clean up order - now himself on disability and whistleblowing after the fact - what was he doing before the fact?

Did he just go along with the flow? Did he not appreciate the widespread implications?

Did he not know what a huge task he had pending and during it and whether he could satisfactorily complete his mission?

These are not questions to be answered. These are statements as to his state of mind thoroughout.

There was no way he was going to clean up this nuclear mess.

He should have known that.

What is the point of whistleblowing now?

Depleted Uranium shells used from 17/1 to 28/2 until Zinn woke up to the reprocussions and Powell [?] declared a cease fire on 3/3 and then there was later a call for the troops to suit up.

Whose crazy? Those who are claimed to have done it or those who claim it was done?