Countdown to general war breaking over Syria?

[Rom]

Vladimir Lenin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin
"Lenin came from a diverse ancestry. He was of Christian Russian, Tatar, German, and Swedish descent, while his maternal grandfather may have descended from the Jewish Blank family.[4] Lenin is also believed to have had Kalmyk ancestry on his father's side.[5][6]
Lenin was born into a comfortable middle-class family. Lenin's father Ilya was elevated into the Russian nobility for his work in the government bureaucracy, and, after being appointed director of Simbirsk's primary schools in 1874, was entitled to wear a blue gold-embroidered uniform and be addressed as "Your Excellency".[7] Although later Soviet biographies tried to disguise his background, Lenin himself never made any effort to hide the fact that he was a nobleman by birth.[5] Lenin argued explicitly in one of his most famous works What Is To Be Done? that intellectuals from "bourgeois" backgrounds have a vital revolutionary role to play bringing political ideas to the working-class movement:.."

Obvious Khazar, from the heartland of Khazars, and supported by European Khazars. The Tzar was not, but I will not bet my head on that.

Iran? They have been fighting Iranians for a 1000 years, time for some revenge. They are always in some kind of "war" ...

[leon]

Rom's beating the crap out of the dead Khazarian horse.

But please take a note how things flare up when we are trying to find a REAL culprit behind our misfortunes. We blamed ephemeral NWO, we blamed G8, and we blamed Papa Bush.
Now we are blaming everybody from Jews to Khasars to Germans. Anybody goes, BUT the British.

It’s the British, stupid.

[Rom]

"The British" is just denials.

[Jimbo]

Current news reports say according to US military sources that Al Qaida in Iraq are behind the latest terrorist acts - - which then inspires the government to strike back against civilians with a vengeance.

Remember in All the Presidents Men how Woodward and Bernstein had to verify each story with three sources? How many US government sources does the BBC use to blame the terror on Al Qaida, an organization I heard was pretty much wiped out.

[leon]

Jimbo, where did you heard that Al Qaida was pretty much wiped out?
On the contrary, it looks pretty much alive and well under Saudi-British-US sponsorship, played a crucial role in Libya coup and now seems to be playing more proactive role in Syria as well.
McClatchy News story reported that US intelligence officials believe that Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) was behind a series of suicide bombings that have taken place inside Syria, Iraqi officials confirmed that Iraq-based militants are indeed making their way from northern Iraq into Syria. Deputy Interior Minister Adnan al-Assadi told AFP that not only militants, but also weapons are being smuggled from Iraq to Syria, using the same networks that were smuggling weapons and fighters into Iraq from Syria during the worst period of the US occupation of Iraq.

Al Qaeda remains what it has always been – NATO boots on the ground doing their dirty work. (That is when not supplying a patsy cover for false flags like 911)

[Rom]

Good points. They took down the Tzar, the took down Hitler, the took down Sukarno, they failed in Vietnam, they took down Saddam, they took down Gaddafi, they want to take down al-Assad (remember general Clark http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSNyPS0fXpU)
What Clark is saying means this is more than US or NATO.

[Jimbo]

I heard of the paucity of Al Qaida members last year, I guess, wondering why we were still fighting in Afghanistan because there were only 100 Al Qaida left in the country.

But whoever the Syrian bombers are, the media are told by "authorities" it is Al Qaida and then the media report it as fact. Not that we know the ultimate truth of who is who but you'd think if there were a respectable sceptic, say Fintan Dunne, a Woodward/Bernstein would ask for some other opinion. Even to make the sceptic look foolish. But it is the media and the government who look foolish trotting out lines from old movies. Or at least they would think of the boy who cried wolf, you know?

[leon]

"why we were still fighting in Afghanistan "

Export civil war and destabilisation into Pakistan? Increased Opium Trade? Placement of NATO force into strategically important Asian location? Waging a proxy war against China? Weakening and demoralisation of US Armed forces? Just making a quick buck?

A lot of "good reasons", none of them have anything to do with Al Qaida

[Rom]

"I heard of the paucity of Al Qaida members last year"

Al Qaeda was created by the Khazars. Major funding of Kurdish Al Qaeda is done by Israel (=Khazarian state, not Jewish)

Major Khazar thinker. He created Al Qaeda.
Zbigniew Brzezinski
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski

Another hardcore Khazar politician.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madeleine_Albright
"Albright currently serves on the Council on Foreign Relations Board of directors and on the International Advisory Committee of the Brookings Doha Center.[70] She is also currently the Mortara Distinguished Professor of Diplomacy at the Georgetown University Walsh School of Foreign Service in Washington, D.C..
In 2003, she accepted a position on the Board of Directors of the New York Stock Exchange. "

"Madeleine Albright serves as Chair of the advisory council for The Hague Institute for Global Justice, which was founded in 2011 in The Hague.[84]"

[leon]

Just replace "Khazars" with "British" and Rom is remarkably on the mark

[Raphael]

[Rom]

"137"

You are (edit) superstitious? And any randomness will work as "proof" for you?

What is interesting is how many UN delegations who are buying the crap about Syria.

[Raphael]

[Rom]

"namaste"

??

"hey Rom do you believe in god? "

Absolutely not, otherwise I would not have been here.

"if you know what '137' "

It was not in the my curriculum. Your questions tell me that you are superstitious, or New age. There is such a mess in their heads you cannot believe it.
But that is not my problem. I don't care if people are New age as long as the are not a "witness"

[Raphael]