US Election 2012 Latest

[leon]

Ron Paul: Tornado Victims Should Not Get Federal Aid
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/05/ron-paul-tornado-fema-aid-_n_1321690.html?ref=politics

Ron Paul has a message for victims of the tornadoes that killed dozens of people in the South and Midwest: buy insurance.

"There is no such thing as federal money," he said Sunday on CNN’s 'State of the Union.' "Federal money is just what they steal from the states and steal from you and me. The people who live in tornado alley, just as I live in hurricane alley, they should have insurance."

Let'em eat cake, right Dr. Paul?

[Rom]

Ron Paul about FEMA

"Victims of disasters should get any and all help possible, and there is virtually no limit to the generosity and compassion of good American people after devastation hits.One only need to remember the outpouring after Katrina to know this is true. FEMA, however, did more to get in the way of relief than to actually provide and facilitate it.

The examples are numerous. When the call was put out for volunteer firefighters, they volunteered by the thousands. It was FEMA, for reasons of control and bureaucratic ineptitude, who made sure they were not, in fact allowed to actually help. When a group of firefighters arrived from Houston, instead of being put immediately on the job, they were told to sit around and wait. After waiting for two days doing nothing, they were simply sent home. One thousand volunteer firefighters were sent to Atlanta to undergo sexual harassment training while fires actively raged in the city."
------

Latest revelation about "help" from professional doctors is that they are actually contributing to death threatining diseases for 50 mill Americans.

It it shocking. Most older male in my family are dead of that disease... guess what disease I am talking about? It makes Holocaust "benign" in comparison, considering the moderate number of millions victims.

[IronClad]

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

I thought it might be a good idea to take a look at the whose who of the signitaries of the Constitution. Their backgrounds and their own personal aims for the country. It was another time and things have changed since and they were looking for growth at a time when there was nothing else but growth. A new land and new prospects.

Well, its an old land and those prospects have been frittered away and faraway places is where those prospects for growth now reside.

May be there ought to be another gathering similar to those who drafted and agreed upon a Constitution with the purpose of drawing up a revised version for our times on the same principles as the existing one or even to reaffirm it. Those that the Constitution provided for have been "written out of it" and something has taken its place.

How would a new Constitution be written today? If we had say, Max Kaiser in on it alongwith the last of the old capitalists with their known track records and even Union leaders [from the old days].

Asking a candidate what his opinion is on abortion is not really addressing the issues of the day. This issue has been on the card for years and there should be a happy medium. But there are more pressing things to be at the top of the list of things to be done under a new presidency.

In one of the videos Romney was wearing jeans and an open white shirt and just before he walked off after finishing his talk he said something like - let's take our country back. This could mean take it back to the good ol' days but it probably means take it back from those who have had it and have misused and abused it and made it a laughing stock around the world.

Your army still pledges allegiance to the Constitution so it has not gone away - it never has.

[leon]

Where Romney/Paul Money Trails Cross

http://consortiumnews.com/2012/02/29/where-romneypauls-money-trails-cross/

The political press corps has puzzled over the strange “bromance” between Republican presidential rivals Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, with all sorts of speculation about why Paul has gone so soft on Romney. However, Mark Ames suggests that perhaps a good place to look is where their financial backers cross, in Salt Lake City.


By Mark Ames

Last week, it finally started to dawn on the slow-as-Stegosaurs media: Why is Ron Paul going so soft on frontrunner Mitt Romney, his natural ideological opposite? Dr. Paul has been flaying every other candidate, particularly when that candidate threatens Romney’s front-runner status — why is Ron Paul so protective over the internationalist/neocon/Rockefeller Republican, Mitt Romney?

Does this point to some sort of alliance between the two? And if so, doesn’t that raise further disturbing questions about the supposed rock-solid-principles guiding Ron Paul’s campaign? You’d expect by now that the media – alerted to this “bizarre” alliance — might think that the answer to this riddle lies in finding a possible money trail linking the two campaigns’ interests together. This is politics after all; stranger things have happened.

One of Ron Paul's official "coalitions" is with the Latter Day Saints, popularly known as the Mormons
Naturally this hasn’t happened; but if the hacks did get around to following the money, they would very quickly stumble across one of the most blatantly bizarre factoids to emerge so far this primary season: Ron Paul’s SuperPAC, “Endorse Liberty,” is headquartered in Mitt Romney’s backyard: Salt Lake City, Utah.

Moreover, the SuperPAC’s staff and founders include several former Romney supporters and Huntsman supporters. And one of the founding principals of Endorse Liberty, Ladd Christensen, is something of an oligarch in Utah: Christensen is the longtime business partner of John Huntsman’s billionaire dad. They founded Huntsman Chemicals together, as well as Hunstman-Christensen.

Huntsman endorsed Mitt Romney when the former ambassador to China bowed out of the GOP race — in fact, Huntsman has a history of stepping aside for Mitt Romney and playing his second banana, going back at least to the Salt Lake City Olympics in 2002, which John’s billionaire dad helped to fund on behalf of Mitt Romney.

So to repeat: Ron Paul’s SuperPAC is based in Salt Lake City, and one of the founders is Ladd Christensen, John Huntsman’s business partner in Huntsman-Christensen and Huntsman Chemicals. Nothing to see here folks, keep moving along…

I have suspected all along some sort of the deal between those two. Big problem for Ron Paul is HE IS NOT DELIVERING.

Ron Paul is nowhere to be seen in regards of Walter Jones Obama-Put-On-Warning bill. All Ron Paul anti-war posturing is just that: posturing.

That leaves American voters with no reasonable choice in coming US Presidential Election. I would probably suggest boycotting it all together and concentrate on the local, state politics

[Rom]

Leon
"Ron Paul is nowhere to be seen in regards of Walter Jones Obama-Put-On-Warning bill. All Ron Paul anti-war posturing is just that: posturing.

That leaves American voters with no reasonable choice in coming US Presidential Election. I would probably suggest boycotting it all together and concentrate on the local, state politics"

Why should we put any confidence in you?

[leon]

You shouldn't. Do your own homework.

[Rom]

Right, Tarpley is a paid think-tanker (whore in street language). He is certified useless, will lie with a smile as long he is getting the paychecks.

When we put our trust in whores it will be Ron Paul who is the one lacking integrity - and hitler will be the Man of the Year ...

[leon]

Rick Santorum wins two southern primaries, humiliating Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/14/rick-santorum-primary-results_n_1342981.html

Are we heading for a brokered Republican convention? Watch for gen. Petraeus as a fascist candidate on a white horse.

[Rom]

From source
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/14/rick-santorum-primary-results_n_1342981.html

"But Santorum shocked the political world and won both states. He won Alabama with 34.6 percent to Gingrich's 29.3 percent and Romney's 28.9 percent, with 94 percent of the vote counted. He won Mississippi in a closer contest, 32.9 percent to 31.3 percent for Gingrich and 30.3 percent for Romney, with 98 percent counted."

How much of the counting is true and how much is fraud? I would guess 5% true and 95% false. Ron Paul is mentioned once as the OVERALL loser by a HUGE margin. Except for that comment he has no existence for journalist Jon Wall.

Let us call Jon Wall a high class political journalist hooker and you a useful idiot.

As we can se here the numbers do not make sense http://i41.tinypic.com/11rrvh1.png

[leon]

Rom comes to New York City and hires a yellow cab at the airport. On the way to the hotel an old lady sprang out of nowhere in front of the cab. Cabbie turns left, old lady jumps left, he turns right, she jumps right. Finally, with complicated maneuver he manages to avoid the collision.
He stops in exasperation and wipes out the sweat when he hears Rom saying from the back seat:

“You muchacho is a bad driver. If Rom didn’t open the back door, the old lady would’ve escaped”.

[Rom]

Try not repost journalists who are producing lies. I don't blame the media whores here (whores are whores), but you should not present them as something else.

It does not matter which of Romney, Gingrich or Santorum becomes GOP candidate - they are all puppets for the Khazars - but it will be a catastrophe for the Khazars if Ron Paul was elected GOP candidate. Then the American voters will have real alternatives in next election, making it a major point in history.

Of course Israel fears Ron Paul for good reasons. Obama "may" have to be assasinated. In case of Ron Paul there is no "may". Israel cannot start a WW III with Ron Paul as President.

The Khazarian Illuminati again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kw735Qm1qb0

[duaneh]

well, let's not get too serious here
after all it's just a show

here's a new subplot and like all good tv writing, ties in other news of the day

http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/03/14/santorum-wins-alabama-dems-claim-to-have-campaign-ending-dirt/

Santorum Wins Alabama & Mississippi; Dems Claim To Have Campaign Ending Dirt


"I have had four years of solid information coming from this source which has always proven to be correct. I would like to ask Sen. Santorum if he knows of anything the DNC would possibly say that would kill his campaign? Also, is there any history between Sen Santorum and Penn State’s Joe Paterno and Jerry Sandusky that Santorum has not disclosed which might shine an unfavorable light on the Senator?



intriguing but subtle, no?

[leon]

Double selloff
http://www.dcdave.com/article5/120314.htm

Ron Paul’s CPAC and Virginia Cop-outs

The Last Straw

The venue: A very private meeting place.

The date: Sometime around the middle of January 2012.

The medium: A secretly recorded conversation

Mitt: Hi, Ron, glad you could make it. We don’t have a lot of time, so I’m going to get right to the point.

Ron: I’m all ears.

Mitt: It’s about that CPAC thing. I have to make a big splash there and I can’t have you upstaging me again.

Ron: I really don’t see how I can help you. It is, after all, the Conservative Political Action Conference, and I’m Mister Conservative, and, quite frankly, we all know that you’re a very long way from that.

Mitt: Well you and I might know that, and most Republicans might think they know that at this point, but we’re taking care of that. People will believe what they’re told to believe by people they trust, especially your good conservative Republicans, bless their hearts. We have “conservative” pundits lined up to say that I’m conservative and that I’m the best candidate. We’re even going to have Ann Coulter say that I’m the most conservative candidate left in the race.

Ron: Well I’ll believe that when I hear it. Even if she were to say it, I don’t think it would cut a lot of ice with my people. She’s no conservative when it comes to big spending for wars and propping up our expensive empire around the world. My folks might even boo her for a remark like that, and then where would you be?

Mitt: Exactly. We don’t want your people there in force this time.

Ron: I know my supporters are loyal and most of them hang on my every word, but I can’t stop them from going to CPAC if they want to. And what excuse could I offer for asking them not to go?

Mitt: What if you weren’t there?

Ron: You mean that they would freeze me out like they did at the Republican Convention last time, and after I’ve easily won the presidential straw poll there the last two years?

Mitt: No, they have to invite you. They have to keep their “conservative” credibility, after all. (Mitt uses air quotes at this point.) We want you to decline the invitation.

(Long silence; Ron stares in disbelief, then finally breaks silence)

Ron: What? That would be completely crazy! That’s the heart of my support base. The CPAC crowd has gone wild for me these last two years when there was no presidential race. Now there is one and I’m in the thick of it and you think I could get by with just taking a walk?

Mitt: Look. Your supporters love you so much they’ll swallow anything you tell them. Tell them you have to campaign in Maine. That’ll hold ‘em.

Ron: For crying out loud! Maine’s not exactly a national media center, and that’s not even a binding referendum they’re holding up there. There are no delegates at stake. The CPAC straw poll carries tons more weight. I’d look like a fool. The media would have a field day over my political ineptitude...or they’d suspect something was up.

(Mitt stares at Ron with almost amused contempt before responding.)

Mitt: The media? Look, this is really important! They’ll play it straight. They’re completely on board. And if they don’t see anything strange about your passing up CPAC then that’s how it will be. I mean, a person here or there might think it was odd, but what do they matter?

Ron: Okay. I see your point. But like the other candidates, I’ll still have my booth and my campaign literat…

Mitt: Uh. About that booth. I’m afraid that’s got to go, too. Your supporters might congregate there and start talking too much among themselves and just generally making trouble like they’ve done in previous years.

Ron: Well, you don’t want to just make everybody angry. My people may be really crazy for me, but even they have their limits.

Mitt: Okay. Here’s the deal. We’ve already talked to Rand. He’s a real team player. He’s agreed to show the flag for the Paul family and give a speech. After that we’ve lined up some friendly interviews for him on talk shows. We think it’s a good compromise all around. He’s just as conservative as you, and he doesn’t have that “foreign policy” problem, if you know what I mean.

Ron: I’ll have to admit that there’s some great long-term thinking behind that plan, but don’t you think you might be outsmarting yourself here? I mean, even without me there, I think that there’s still a real good chance that I would win that straw poll. You think you were embarrassed before? Think of how embarrassing that would be.

(Again Mitt just stares at Ron with that same half-amused look before speaking.)

Mitt: For a guy of your age and political experience you really surprise me sometimes. I told you that this is really important. CPAC is changing from paper ballots to electronic voting, and here’s what the outcome is going to be. I’m going to get 38%, Santorum will get 31%, Gingrich 15%, and you will finish last with 12%.* I know it sounds implausible that you could drop so low, which explains why we need your absence from the conference so badly as a sort of explanation.

Ron: But the press will…

Mitt: Ron! Ron! Get a grip! Now about our head-to-head showdown on Super Tuesday in Virginia…

(At that point the bug stopped picking up the conversation.)

[leon]

Romney-Paul secret deal in the works?

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/2012/03/19/romney-paul-secret-deal-works


SEN. RAND PAU, R-KY.: Good evening.

LOWRY: Now Senator, as you know a lot of speculation about this. The latest this week, Time Magazine had a story where it quoted your father's top campaign aide saying, one of the things he would want if he eventually were to go with Romney and that circumstance would possibly be the vice presidency. And when anyone says, anything like that, speculation immediately comes in points right at you. So, let me ask, do you have any interest in being Romney's number two, should he be the nominee?

PAUL: Well, I think what is funny about it is that I think the deal must be so secret that no one has told me about the deal yet.

Lying sack of shit

[Rom]

Leon, you are transferring too much own your own mentality into other people. These are Christians = different mentalitiy