FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Kevin Ryan 9/11 researcher
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
Jimbo



Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 498

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:27 pm    Post subject: Kevin Ryan 9/11 researcher Reply with quote

Recall when Fintan pointed out how the WTC planes suddenly tilted their wings so that they'd do the most damage to the buildings. Well, according to Kevin Ryan the four floors Flight 11 took out were very special.

The North Tower Impact Zone

On 9/11, American Airlines Flight 11 hit the north face of the north tower (WTC 1) between floors 94 and 99. In a stunning coincidence, these floors bracket those that had been upgraded for fireproofing shortly before 9/11. [12] This coincidence was amplified by the fact that one tenant occupied all of those floors – Marsh & McLennan (Marsh), which at the time was the world's largest insurance brokerage company. One other tenant, Sumitomo Bank, shared part of floor 96 with Marsh.

http://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Read on for many more surprises.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 3226
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forget "demolition access"

Kevin Ryan is an idiot but a few questions came to my mind:



Was a homing beacon needed to set the impact zone?
Could it have been placed there?
It would only require one agent.

For speculative purposes:

http://www.navfltsm.addr.com/vor-nav.htm

http://www.navfltsm.addr.com/howitbegan.htm

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/performance/q0146.shtml
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sasha



Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 316
Location: Caribbean (kar-uh-bee-uhn) of Canada

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All you need for a JASSM missile strike is a nice bright, clear sunny day, some dude on a boat in a lawn chair, lasing the target(s).

All operations were probably run out of NYC Command airtight bunker in building 7. Minimise people using pre ops prep and tech.

Then for the big show. A live fire weapons exercise, in front of NYC and television audiences everywhere.

Anyone who thinks the WTC towers I and II were done with conventional demo is confused. Top down not bottom up.

Image 1:


The black building in the foreground is 40 floors tall. In Image 1 the top 70 floors have been atomically changed. Matter has changed. Atomic disassociation has resulted in the dustification of the top floors. Or the building is being destroyed from the top down. There is no mass left in the 70 floors pulverised into the space of 20 floors. All metal is gone. HVAC piping gone. AC units gone. Scott air tanks are popin' on the ground. No filing cabinets remain. Aluminum would survive. Paper survives. Punchout and voids are forming in other parts of the WTC where no debris has struck. 100's of cars blocks away are bursting into cold flame. Engine blocks gone. Door handles gone. Yet the car is untouched elsewhere.


Then in Image 1
The lower (pristine) 40 floors await termination.

Only to leave a stump of 20 ft in height (dwarfed by WTC 6 and 4). Conventional demo will leave 20% of the buildings' original height. Or maybe 270-300ft. I don't see that in LIDAR photos taken on Sept 14-15 2001 by NOAA. *Oct date on photo website is not correct!

No planes. No thermite, thermate, or paint containing any of this.

Think Hi Tech.

Unlearn what you have learned. Just maybe there is a level of science out there ya can't quite get your head around.

_________________
The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names.
- Chinese proverb


Last edited by Sasha on Sat Jan 22, 2011 7:06 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
MichaelC



Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 2426

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
All operations were run out of NYC Command airtight bunker in building 7.
and that was the (main) reason for the later 'collapse' of building 7?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 3226
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome to 2004 Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hombre



Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 967

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bri wrote:
Welcome to 2004 Crying or Very sad


Give it up! Are you two-three-four--MAN ENOUGH! WTF!!!!!!!!!!ALREADY!

Hombre'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 3226
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forgive my reply.
I will shut up now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leon



Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 1046
Location: 3d-rate nation

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Listen, there is no point in arguing about the technical details of the 911 attack on US – that is exactly what the enemy wants. Delay and confuse operation by many “alternative-media stooges”, including this site. Only proper funded, independent and professional investigation will crack-open this case in relatively short time.
In my opinion, it was enemy attack against the US, most likely coordinated by British intelligence and funded by Saudi’s oil money with the help of US-based fifth column. But again, it is just an opinion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big Boss



Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 828
Location: Outer Heaven

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

leon wrote:
Listen, there is no point in arguing about the technical details of the 911 attack on US – that is exactly what the enemy wants. Delay and confuse operation by many “alternative-media stooges”, including this site....


Clarify please, thx lol...Hey Bri, don't keep your mouth shut bud, keep it comin' Smile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leon



Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 1046
Location: 3d-rate nation

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You heard me and you know what I am saying
This site is a small-time intelligence operation designed to capture the US audience that is smart enough not to go for the “loud-mouth” operations like Alex Jones or “UFO-crackpot” Jeff Rense (much more lucrative operations). It is doing so by pretence to “intelligence”, “sophistication”, and a bit of “scientific mysticism”.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sasha



Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 316
Location: Caribbean (kar-uh-bee-uhn) of Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MichaelC:
"and that was the (main) reason for the later 'collapse' of building 7?"

Eyes on target.

There may have been a residual bonus. Yes use the space for completion of each stage of op. Then the last piece - 'pull' building 7. It was an airtight space. With it's own air, power, h2o...part of the destruction phase and part of the show involved chemicals 'smoldering'. Things like blue antimony and many other chemicals that should never have been detected were detected after 9/11.

Evidence for upcoming SEC trials were housed in 7. So evidence on things like Whitewater etc... gone. Lots of other things that conveniently went - Star Trek red shirt. See WTC 7 tenant list.

_________________
The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names.
- Chinese proverb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hombre



Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 967

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You've been working on this--Breaking this that and the other--for HOW LONG NOW?

You've got what? Pithy stuff like Welcome to 2004--angled Plane attacks and WE FOUND one passenger seat at the Pentagon so "IT WAS A PLANE " No way it could have been a missile.

It stinks to high heaven of something other than someone seeking the TRUTH--For one, I'm sick of seeing unwitting, ill informed folks, being taken for a ride!

But hey, if that's what people really want, then by all means-

Keep it comin!!



Hombre'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.