Arab Spring / Mid-East Revolutions Latest

[noplacebo]

i beg to differ, the only constant is change,oh and as well as your incessant sniping.

[noplacebo]

i think the topic i was looking for( the peoples revolution, libya yemen etc) seems to have been subsumed by the "tarhir square..." heading.havent been in in a while was just wondering like ,ok.

[Fintan]

Egyptian security forces shooting at head-level
yesterday on Mohammed Mahmoud street:

[atm]

I am NOT sniping at you noplacebo. One is agreeing with you, exclamation mark.

The inside track on all this nonsense can be read here:

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/11/second-revolution-rocks-egypt.html

and furthermore, here, but a very different country:

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/11/iiss-syrias-opposition-is-armed.html

Yeah, the Russian Federation just stationed warships off the Syrian coast to look cool.

It's the new international bling, innit?

atm

[Fintan]

[atm]

Eh, eh, get me a court of appeal, capeesh?

Meantime:



Hey, sweetheart, the truth is often twisted into fact and vice versa.

You of all people should know that. They are called colour revolutions for a reason.

For Christmas I shall send you some crayons and an elephant pad.

Hey! Colour revoutions DIY. [CIA shurely?]

atm

[noplacebo]

i think we can assume correctly the egyptian situation is being funded covertly by the usual pack of wolves, circling, ready to consume their meal. but i do think that the genuine egyptian citizens are mobbing here, which is calling for the more circuitous approach. but in libya it was openly funded by taxpayers and supported by the media, as well as by some commentators on here, whom by wagging their tongues in support gave another wiggle on the penknife to remove the irksome stone(gadaffi) from the shoe of global finance. of course gadaffi was a tyrant,but look at the situation now, the people are out of their imprisoned frying pan and into the fire of freedom, only now they have a bunch of out and out mercenaries to deal with,whom kick the people to the gutter for the dogs to queue along the sidewalk for their share of the kill. dispassionate analysis and debate might be too much to ask for in these heated times,but i think thats what most people come to this forum for. not to fall in behind some flag waving

[atm]

Fintan

it would seem that we have become errant victims of thine common enemy.

I apologize for any offence; twas not meant caustic, merely rumbustious.

atm

[Fintan]

What 'caustic'? No Prob. Rumbustious I anticipate.

Noplacebo, the fire of any freedom is better than
the frying pan of tyranny. Not perfect. But better.

Just because the NWO is active in trying to buy themselves a
piece of the Arab revolutions, does not mean they originated
the revolution. The Arab Spring was born out of decades of
ruthless oppression by bought and paid NWO regimes.

History knows that.
And the Arabs know that.
They are not stupid.

In Egypt, they know El-Baradei is a clear American proxy.
In Syria they know the NWO faction is trying a hijack gambit.
In Libya all know the NWO bought influence with air power.

There is a battle on to try subvert the revolutions.

The job of the left-gatekeeper media is to spin the revolts as an
NWO job --to try prevent Westerners from becoming inspired by
Arabs to throw off the same oppressive NWO regime. Simple.

The gatekeepers needed to come up with a plausible explanation for
why the NWO would want to get rid of a dictator, Gadaffi -- with whom
they were already doing very profitable business and who had long
since been welcomed into the fold as a comrade - feted by Tony Blair.

Without a plausible explanation for why the NWO would dump Gadaffi,
the whole disinfo scheme would look lame. So they came up with the
idea that Gadaffi's gold dinar project was a threat to the NWO.

Gaddafi organized two conferences. The first in 1986 and the last in 2000.
Neither went anywhere. The idea was an African federation like the EU -
with a currency backed by the dinar. The suitability of Africa's immature
economies for a gold standard was always questionable - and the rest of
Africa was cautious about Gaddafi. The news outlet which drove the hype
about this old gold union idea as a reason for invasion was Russia Today.



To promote disinfo, RT used a minor unknown called Dr. James Thring.
Also appearing on that RT segment were CIA stooge Cynthia McKinney
and the dubious Anthony Wile, founder of the Daily Bell.

A gold Islamic dinar already exists, by the way:
http://www.e-dinar.com/html/1_2.html

And it is already accepted by the IMF as an SDR currency:
http://goldprice.org/gold-mints/2008/08/islamic-mint.html

All this is a re-run of an identical disinfo tactic at the time of the Iraq invasion,
when the disinfo story was that Saddam was about to sell oil in Euros.

[noplacebo]

i agree with every sentence of your last post, what i thought a little over zealous was you geeing the allied forces on into libya, but that is only my view, disseminated from your most usually adroit reporting.

[Fintan]

Well perhaps if you spoke to emigrant Libyans who had lived under
and suffered at the hands of Gaddafi's secret police you too would
be cheering his demise. He was little more than a well-dressed thug
running a clan-based system where insiders prospered and the rest
queued up for the leftovers. No offense taken.

[Fintan]

[noplacebo]

i am not a gadaffi supporter what i find distasteful is the cheerleading of alliance forces into libya, it is indefenceble to go marching(or flying) into other countries for financial gain. it is predatory warmongering at its worst, pure and simple.

[leon]

"it is indefenceble to go marching(or flying) into other countries for financial gain"

Is it defensible to go marching(or flying) into other countries and killing it's civil population, destroying its civil infrastructure and unleashing murderous AlQaida thugs on civil population for ANY reason?

[noplacebo]

Leon,i would say, no it isnt, i was commenting solely on libya, in that instance.