FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
911 from a South African's Perspective.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> State Terror: 9/11, 7/7, CIA Fakes
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Location: South Africa

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:12 pm    Post subject: 911 from a South African's Perspective. Reply with quote


As indicated in the title of this post, I live in South Africa. Our Media here is not as well controlled as the Media in the States and Europe is, or let me rather say it was not so when the 911 crisis happened.

It might or might not be more controlled now, but I have no idea since I never listen to it any more. I also threw out my TV set in 1996.

Anyway, here was the way I saw the whole thing at the time.

In August 1998, there was a bomb blast at the US embassy in Nigeria. At the time, it seemed quite odd to me and other South Africans why a bomb blast would go off in Nigeria, especially at a US Embassy.

Then some dots began to connect in my head.... 2 years prior to that, Shell had made a large oil discovery on the Nigerian Coast.

Nigeria had been mining oil for about 50 years already at that stage, and my initial thoughts were that perhaps the locals were burnin 'n lootin due to the hardcore pollution of the oil companies. That was not an unusual event, since the oil sites were renowned for wrecking everything in their path with zero money going to those who's homes and incomes it destroyed. The Nigerian government also conveniantly turns a blind eye on the pollution and destruction due to the right money going into the right pockets.

But then when I started exploring the bombing, I realised that the scale and technology required for the bomb that went off at the embassy was way out of the budget of the looters and burners.

They are the rural people who live off fishing in the ocean and can not do that due to the dead fish from the oil spills etc.

So it all clicked... The states were the ones that bombed the embassy. At the time I did not know why. A few short months later, I do not recall the exact date, suddenly NATO had arrived on the scene.

They were there to help the unrest that had gone out of proportion. To quell the unrest, the mineral and oil rights went to.... you guessed it.


It was then that I fully realised what the whole US Embassy bombing was all about.

So time moved on and 911 came around. The very first thing I though about when I saw the clip ( I went to a friends house who had a tv ) was that CNN was THERE when it happened.

In the replays, CNN claimed do be conviniently filming a coffe shop on the diagonal corner opposite the twin towers. How ever convenient. When have you ever seen a CNN clip about a coffee shop????

All they had to do was turn 180 degree's and they were filming the towers.

OK, Call it co-incidence.

Then as the news started filtering through, I thought for fucks sake, our Airports here in SA have a better security system in their airports and we have no FBI and CIA and MI5 etc. just pretty poorly paid policeman and security guards.

I can figure one plane being hijacked but FOUR. Initially we only heard about two planes.

So my instant thought was about the fairly recent Nigeria bomb event.

As the news got brought out it became pretty obvious that the whole thing was a psyop to go to war against Iraq. Obvious reasons, same as Nigeria, oil and minerals and control of the country. Not to mention biological warfare for sport on mothers and children by the plenty just for added fun.

Now all this, everyone already knows...

So why did I put this post here?

Because the one thing that I fail to see is something I heard on our SA local radio news about 5 or 6 months after 911 that I have not seen mentioned on the forums even though I have searched for it.

And that thing is the law that was passed for the right for both Britain and the USA to arrest and hold without trial indefinately anyone they suspect might be a terrorist.

That is a pretty convenient Anti Terrorist Bill to get for killing your own countries people.

Check the link:-

and check this Google search :-

There are 9 listed on the first page and one of the 'suspected terrorist arrests' is November 2009, the others were 2010. I wonder how many there are that are not mentioned.

I can see by that look in your eye, YOU look like a terrorist!! And YOU too, from those terrorist looking clothes you are wearing! You also!!!! You have that terrorist style walk!!!!

Detained without trial is a convenient way of disposing of anyone who disagrees with you for however long you wish to do so.

The strangest thing is that the NWO want a rebellion, so they can go battle axe anyone who gets in their way.

There are other ways to fight them.

An example:-

Here is one way of getting em between a rock and a hard place. Let us say I am Joe Bloggs, and I live in the States. I lay a lawsuit against one of the NWO companies, there are many to choose from, for example choose a Bilderberg Company.

What do I sue them for? Let us say they make shoes, I sue them for some outrageously huge sum of money, like $48 million dollars, because their shoes caused a pain in my ankle and due to the stress I could not focus on a business deal and I lost the $48 million contract due to their faulty shoes.

Fortunately for me (Joe Bloggs) , since I am not too bright, I do not have the best Lawyer in town, and I lose the case superfast.

That means that the NWO company wins the case because they had no 'contract' that they had to uphold with me.

That is when people en-masse can then ignore new 'rules'/legislations etc. that get passed by the NWO government.

You fight them in court. You do not refuse to pay taxes, you supoena the state to court to argue WHY you believe you do not need to pay taxes. Or any other government services etc.

You use the same legal right that the NWO company used to not pay you. You have no contract with them and therefore you owe them nothing.

They can not overule another courts ruling.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Now let us assume that they have undercover psyops reading this here right now.

Why great you say?

Because if they KNOW you are after the 'no contract' ruling, then the shoe companies only other option is to pay out Joe Bloggs (and everyone else that then jumps on the same bandwagon) whatever he is suing them for.

Either way, they are fucked.

Blue Mental.
Peace, Harmony and Happiness to all.

The only thing I know is that I know nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 3861

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brevity and clarity will get you far.

Point taken?

Welcome to BFN.

Now then, what were you saying?

atm Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Location: South Africa

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be fleeting and brief might be your way of getting a message across.
I however prefer to say exactly what I mean so that the clarity can in no way be misconstrued.

There is a reason why each seemingly 'unrelated' item/concept or issue is there.

So if you wish to answer your own question and find out what I was saying, then read what I said.

Thank you for your Welcome.


The only thing I know is that I know nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Location: South Africa

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We are in an age that assumes the narrowing trends of specialization to be logical,
natural, and desirable. Consequently, society expects all earnestly responsible
communication to be crisply brief. Advancing science has now discovered that all
the known cases of biological extinction have been caused by overspecialization,
whose concentration of only selected genes sacrifices general adaptability. Thus the
specialist's brief for pinpointing brevity is dubious. In the meantime, humanity has
been deprived of comprehensive understanding. Specialization has bred feelings of
isolation, futility, and confusion in individuals. It has also resulted in the
individual's leaving responsibility for thinking and social action to others.
Specialization breeds biases that ultimately aggregate as international and
ideological discord, which, in turn, leads to war
- Bucky Fuller.
The only thing I know is that I know nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 316
Location: Caribbean (kar-uh-bee-uhn) of Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can dig that

The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names.
- Chinese proverb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8692

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah those are powerful insights by Fuller.
Sure, we need specialists. They're great!

Just not at the expense of generalists/synthesizers.

That post 9/11 wipe-out of civil liberties, last year led to this:

Three-year-old boy arrested as suspected terrorist in France

By Peter Allen - 29th April 2010

A three-year-old was arrested as a suspected terrorist and held at a
French police station for more than two hours, it emerged today. The
child identified only as Daniel is the son of an illegal immigrant
from the Paris suburb of Juvisy.

Unfortunately, the more senior the judge,
the more unlikely he/she is to rock the
establishment boat.

Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Location: South Africa

PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:13 pm    Post subject: Arresting Opposition or NWO Stooges. Reply with quote

The problem is that without proper research as done by atm in the Egyptian Revolution Posts, we don't know if they are arresting their opposition or just finding a way to sneak another of their own into the loop.

Now arresting a three year old is just plain fucking insanity. The only possible reason for doing that that springs to mind is using the child as a hostage to control the child's parents.


The only thing I know is that I know nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> State Terror: 9/11, 7/7, CIA Fakes All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.