FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Moon
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
skinters



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 418

PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SidVicious wrote:



Here is the must read Dave McGowan article Jimbo refers to;
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html



Good reading that sid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 2906
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SidVicious wrote:
I have to mention- For those that have read the Dave McGowan article before, I've just now noticed that it's been periodically updated and contains a lot of new content [since the last time I read it]


McGowan lost credibility with me a few articles into his 60's-70's music industry article.
To be fair there were many interesting facts
I hadn't known about including the circumstances of Admiral Morrison.
However, after a while the idea of Frank Zappa being 'Illuminati' or whatever became a bit of a yawn.
Therefore I wouldn't be surprised if although his articles on the moon
might contain some interesting information worth further looking into,
most of it is probably botched facts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MichaelC



Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 1968

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

interesting link, skinters. The moon lie - along with dozens of other NWO lies of the 20th and 21st centuries - is believed by the masses because the media and the politicians tell them it is so.

As for the history books 50 years from now? NO problem - they will be 'cleansed' as were all the history books I was taught with during my 20th century school days!


Last edited by MichaelC on Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:27 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Figaro



Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mythbusters on the 'moon hoax':
<object><param></param><param></param><param></param></object>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimbo



Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 365

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now see? Those Mythbuster guys ain't dumb. They believe we went to the moon. They even busted some myths! Unless they're CIA. But that McGowan does raise some good points like why the hell have the US nor anyone else attempted another manned moon shot for 40 years?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skinters



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 418

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jimbo wrote:
Now see? Those Mythbuster guys ain't dumb. They believe we went to the moon. They even busted some myths! Unless they're CIA. But that McGowan does raise some good points like why the hell have the US nor anyone else attempted another manned moon shot for 40 years?


Ive read all what McGowan got on the moon.

Quote:
Not only is there no crater, there is no sign of scorching and none of the small ‘Moon rocks’ and not a speck of ‘lunar soil’ has been displaced! And if you refer back to the earlier close-up of the module’s landing pod, you will see that not so much as a single grain of ‘lunar soil’ settled onto the lunar modules while they were setting down.



The above is Mcgowan talking about why on landing the rockets did not make a single mark on the surface.Also there was not a single scrap of dust on the landing pads of the module.

They tried to debunk this by saying that the modules rockets were turned off just before touchdown.This is ridiculous when the module still weighed 3 ton on the moon.The reverse thrust engine would still have to be used right up until touchdown to prevent the damage to the module legs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hombre



Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 967

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's with the NASA.GOV SHIT-- Laughing There's a loose bot roaming this hall!

Why not just ask em to explain ( TLI ) and call it a day. With a straight face that is! Cool --


Mythbusters--LOL The one guy is still looking for a Young Grace Slick! Enough said.

Kill that app! It's Making you look really really bad!

Hombre'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hombre



Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 967

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ROTFLMAO: Really, I mean really---it this a legitimate NASA Photo of Alan B Shepard---

If it is no wonder some folks have issues with the Great Moon Hoax--IF THIS DUDE is on the Moon when this photo was snapped then I'm Elton John! Laughing Laughing Laughing



Look at the shadows---" It's an f, ing fake photo " Whether it's real or not, relevant or not, who the hell cares--it's fake--exactly like the mission itself.

Come on NASA---Puke it up already!!!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1344980/Moon-liquid-core-just-like-Earth-reveal-sensors-left-lunar-surface-astronauts-40-YEARS-ago.html

Hombre'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimbo



Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 365

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are not scientists still unsure what is at the core of the earth and if so how can what they've gleaned from moon data say the moon's core is the same as the earth's?

But again, if it is a hoax how can they even release a bogus report like this one in the Mail without fear of getting massively busted?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 6582

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is that really you Reginald Kenneth Dwight?

Anyway, let's assume for the sake of argument that the
photo above was really a fake taken out in Area 51....

So where WAS was the light source positioned?

Either...
Off to the left, to throw the astronaut's shadow to the right?

Or....
Off to the right, to throw the flag shadow to the left?

Can't be two lights or there would be dual shadows.

Alternatively, it might be changing slope of the ground behind
the flag which makes the shadows LOOK like they are converging
--regardless of whether photographed on Earth or the Moon.


_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jimbo



Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 365

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whoa! Re above Mythbusters video. Skeptics wonder why there are no stars in real moon photos and so I wondered why I couldn't see the room's background in the video above. After all with just one light source I should see the shelves. And so at about 3:13 you can see a pure black mat behind their fake moon surface duplicating the black sky of the "real" moon photos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BlueMental



Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Location: South Africa

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:30 pm    Post subject: The Flag on the Moon Reply with quote

If I were the country that landed on the moon and placed my flag on the moon, I would focus the Hubble telescope on that same moon and show the world pictures of the flag and footprints that I left on the moon.

BMI.

_________________
The only thing I know is that I know nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atm



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 3852

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BlueMental

I concur; Occam's Razor expertly defined.

atm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 2906
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fintan wrote:

--regardless of whether photographed on Earth or the Moon.


Oh...if only we could start there outside of crazies on both sides....
Not to say Kubrick wasn't smart enough to do it.
It's interesting and I want to believe but....eh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atm



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 3852

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bubbles and lost marbles:




Hmmm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.