FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Pyramid CAPSTONE = Rodin VBM = 5x5 SATOR SQUARE
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> The Thinking Zone
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
Raphael



Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 1337
Location: SpaceTimeVibration

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The controversy regarding the FIRST Pharaoh to unify Egypt, i.e. Menes and Narmer, associated to the letters mn is gratifying to say the least.





Sator Square and its mirror palindrome the Rotas Square

Therefore we can now add to the short list of *special* asymmetrical symbols the Sator/Rotas Magic Square.

This small select group is defined by the fact there are two asymmetrical halves that help define a symmetry when placed together, the y-axis acting as a hinge is one way of looking at it.
Traveling along the z-axis is another way.

Is MENES a MEME, a MNEME,a MNEMoNic, i.e. MNEMosyne the mother of 9 muses that spell the word TENET in four directions?

Menes and Narmer

Quote:
(fl. c. B.C. 3100-3038 B.C.)

>> The identity of Menes is the subject of ongoing debate, although mainstream Egyptological consensus identifies Menes with the protodynastic pharaoh Narmer[1][2][3] (most likely) or first dynasty Hor-Aha.[6] Both pharaohs are credited with the unification of Egypt, to different degrees by various authorities.
The famous Narmer Palette, discovered in 1898 in Hierakonpolis, shows Narmer displaying the insignia of both Upper andLower Egypt, giving rise to the theory that he unified the two kingdoms in c. 3100 BC.[5]

>> The mainstream Egyptological consensus identifying Narmer with Menes is by no means universal. This has ramifications for the agreed history of ancient Egypt. Some Egyptologists hold that Menes is the same person as Hor-Aha and that he inherited an already-unified Egypt from Narmer;[6] others hold that Narmer began the process of unification but either did not succeed or succeeded only partially, leaving it to Menes to complete. Arguments have been made that Narmer is Menes because of his appearance on several ostraca in conjunction with the gameboard hieroglyph for "mn", which appears to be a contemporary record to the otherwise mythical king.

The name, Menes, means "He who endures", which, Edwards (1971) suggests, may have been coined as "a mere descriptive epithet denoting a semi-legendary hero [...] whose name had been lost".[4] Rather than a particular person, the name may conceal collectively the protodynastic pharaohs Ka,Scorpion and Narmer.[4]

The almost complete absence of any mention of Menes in the archaeological record,[4] and the comparative wealth of evidence of Narmer, a protodynastic figure credited by posterity and in the archaeological record with a firm claim[2] to the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt, has given rise to a theory identifying Menes with Narmer.

The chief archaeological reference to Menes is an ivory label from Naqada which shows the royal Horus-name Aha (the pharaoh Hor-Aha) next to a building, within which is the royal nebty-name mn,[10] generally taken to be Menes.[4][11] From this, various theories on the nature of the building (a funerary booth or a shrine), the meaning of the word "mn" (a name or the verb endures) and the relationship between Hor-Aha and Menes (as one person or as successive pharaohs) have arisen.[1]

The Turin and Abydos king lists, generally accepted to be correct,[1] list the nebty-names of the pharaohs, not their Horus-names,[2] and are vital to the potential reconciliation of the various records: the nebty-names of the king lists, the Horus-names of the archaeological record and the number of pharaohs in Dynasty I according to Manetho and other historical sources.[2]

Petrie first attempted this task,[2] associating Iti with Djer as the third pharaoh of Dynasty I, Teti (Turin) (or another Iti (Abydos)) with Hor-Aha as second pharaoh, and Menes (a nebty-name) with Narmer (a Horus-name) as first pharaoh of Dynasty I.[1][2] Lloyd (1994) finds this succession "extremely probable",[2] and Cervelló-Autuori (2003) categorically states that "Menes is Narmer and the First Dynasty begins with him".[3] However, Seidlmayer (2004) states that it is "a fairly safe inference" that Menes wasHor-Aha.[6]


But quite some time ago I made the profound connections between

M rotated becomes 3, W, and E in the mirror the same 4 images appear reversed.
N rotated becomes a Z or 2 and in the mirror appear as a 5, S or reverse 'N'.

Very gratifying finding this link to 'MN'.
Because MN plus the T cross gives us the word TENET Cross.

9 letters that form the 'gravity cross'.

TENET



But what is the best evidence suggesting that my MN theory is a match for the Egyptian MN?

AHA!
Rotations and reflections of the letters M and N are used to denote the four directions.

M= W and E = x axis
N = N and S = y axis


M = 3, W, and E
N = Z, 2, 5, S, and reverse 'N'

The mn is to be found in the 'weather vane', associated with the rooster, nice touch, I would notice that because 1957 was the year of the rooster.

You can see the effects of blowing in the wind and perspective in these two images.

a) S = 2 and N = reverse 'N'
b) E = 3 and W = W



E = M is the E/W axis forms a cross with N/S axis, all 4 directions revolve around a central hub.

Could it be any simpler, more elegant?
Yes, what if?

M or E = magnetism/electricity

N = nuclear

namaste

_________________
KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Raphael



Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 1337
Location: SpaceTimeVibration

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The Key of Solomon
(Clavicula Salomonis)

For obtaining grace and influence write down the following words:

SATOR, AREPO, TENET, OPERA, ROTAS, IAH, IAH, IAH, ENAM, IAH, IAH, IAH, KETHER, CHOKMAH, BINAH, GEDULAH, GEBURAH, TIPHERETH, NETZACH, HOD, YESOD, MALKUTH, ABRAHAM, ISAAC, JACOB, SHADRACH, MESHACH, ABEDNEGO, be ye all present in my aid and for whatsoever I shall desire to obtain.

http://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/ksol.htm#chap14


note: This incantation is also given in 1307 Sloane MSS., page 76. -SLM

namaste

_________________
KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Raphael



Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 1337
Location: SpaceTimeVibration

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RODIN coil windings and 137.5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8fCwddwb8w

need to watch this one.

namaste

_________________
KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Optimist777



Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 262

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
WizOz:
While on the subject of Phi the Golden mean rectangle below is a synthesis of the:

Phi golden rectangle grid
Squaring the circle,
Great Pyramid,
Hexagon - flower of life (circles removed),
Vesica piscis,
All seeing eye

producing the Twin Flames moving thru' the portal of consciousness.



Looks similar to mirroring the original Rodin diagram. It worked with the Pythgorean Lambdoma, why not Rodin Math?

Quatrefoil


I zee two Z's, 52/SS

1,2,4,8, 16 (1+6= 7), 32 (3+2= 5), 64 (6+4=10= 1), 128 (1+2+8=11=1+1= 2), 256 (2+5+6=13=1+3= 4), 512 (5+1+2=8 ),
1024 (1+2+4= 7) to infinity.

_________________
TRIA SUNT MIRABILIA DEUS ET HOMO MATER ET VIRGO TRINUS ET UNUS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> The Thinking Zone All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.