FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
9/11 Deja Vu : The Audios. The Analysis.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 29, 30, 31 ... 35, 36, 37  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 3184
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/73908689/Michael-Ochs-Archives
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8138

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
This is the con game of all the centuries
--it is a colossal robbery of our nation and people.


If you cannot see from the above all of the boldfaced lies and grab
of America’s financial assets, then you/we deserve what’s coming.

...We can see that the next goal of these powerbrokers is a national
sales tax so that we can reduce our debt. America is being stripped
of her assets and her citizens are being put in greater and greater
bondage through usury and taxation!

--Joan Veon, April 24, 2010


Video presentation by Joan Veon:

Quote:












Part 5 onward here:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Joan+Veon+Central+Banks


In the 9/11DejaVu audios I revealed that Hank Paulson
had been in the Nixon White House. We also tracked back
on Nixon to find his first bid for political office, in the late
1940's, had been funded by Romanian Nazi-sympathizer,
Nicolai Malaxa.

All this highlighted the roots of the 9/11 event in the groups
which came to global power at the end of WWII.

This article below and the videos above trace the financial
moves surrounding the IMF, World Bank, and the secretive
BIS (Bank of International Settlements). Below we again
find the issue of Nazi-friendly activities at the heart of the
financial systems.

Quote:
THE BANKER'S GLOBAL NETWORK

by Alfred Mendez

By the late 1930's the BIS had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias - much of it disclosed by Charles Higham in his book "Trading With the Enemy", and years later corroborated by a BBC Timewatch film "Banking With Hitler" ( broadcast in late '98 ).

Two examples of such bias (there were many more) were:

(1) The BIS had arranged transfers into the account of the German's Reichbank of $378 million of what was, in effect, gold looted from the coffers of the invaded countries of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Holland and Belgium; and

(2) in the summer of 1942, plans for the projected American invasion of Algeria were leaked to the governor of the French National Bank, who immediately contacted his German colleague in the BIS, SS Gruppenfuehrer Baron Kurt von Schroder (of the Stein Bank of Cologne), and by transferring 9 billion gold francs to Algiers - via the BIS - the Germans and their French subsidiaries made a killing of some $175 million in this dollar-exchange scam.

Given the membership of the BIS at that time, this was hardly surprising. On the board were the following high-profile representatives of the Axis powers (there were 4 others): Walther Funk (Pres. of the Reichbank); Kurt von Schroder (above); Dr. Hermann Schmitz (Jt.Chm. of I.G.Farben); Emil Puhl (V/Pres. of the Reichbank); Yoneji Yamamoto; and Dr. V. Azzolini (Gov. Bank of Italy).

It should be added that, of the non-Axis members on the board, many - such as Montagu Norman (Gov. of the Bank of England) were Nazi sympathisers, and that the President of the BIS from 1939 to 1946 was Thomas McKittrick, an American corporate lawyer who had been both Director of Lee, Higginson & Co. (a company which had made substantial loans to the Third Reich) and Chairman of the British-American Chamber of Commerce in London. His continued presidency of the BIS after America's entry into the war in December1941 was approved by Germany and Italy with this significant addendum to their note of authorisation: "McKittrick's opinions are safely known to us".

With the above noted disclosures in mind, the policy of appeasement pursued by Britain and France towards Germany in the pre-war period can now be more readily understood. By concluding a pact with Hitler, Britain and France - in effect - gave him the green light to advance eastwards (ref. "Mein Kampf"). Furthermore, the fact that they shared his endemic anti-communism blinded them to the risk that they were running by negotiating from a position of comparative military weakness - of which Hitler was perfectly aware - and for which they paid a heavy price. It should also be added that the architect of this act of appeasement, Prime Minister Chamberlain, was a shareholder in ICI, which had ties with I.G.Farben.

In the late '30's, and more particularly during World War 2, given America's great wealth - as opposed to Europe's straitened circumstances - it was inevitable that the trade between the two would be of a one-way nature, from the former to the latter. And not surprisingly, in view of the close relationship between American and German corporations (as noted above), a substantial portion of supplies went to Germany - often via fascist Spain - by ship and tanker under flags of neutrality. Many of the financial arrangements covering such trade were handled by BIS in neutral Basle.

As an example of how substantial this trade was: in mid-'44 Am,erica was supplying Germany with 48 thousand tons of oil, and 11 hundred tons of much-needed wolfram (tungsten) per month! The fact that this trade was illegal in the USA for much of this period - and particularly after America's entry into the war in December '41 - did little to stop such trade. The large corporations, such as Standard Oil and ITT, saw to that. After all, then - as now - the US Administration was effectively under corporate control (as it has been since 1933, during FDR's term of office). Even the Secretary of Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, and his Assistant, Harry Dexter White, aware as they well were of the part played by BIS in this, could do little about it.

In July '44, 730 delegates from 44 countries met at Bretton Woods to plan a framework for post-war international trade, payments and investments - a conference which subsequently resulted in the setting up in'47 of both the International Bank for Reconstruction & Development (IBRD, or World Bank) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The apparent inviolability of the BIS referred to above was perhaps best illustrated by the fact that Resolution 5, calling for the dissolution of BIS, was subsequently ignored and proven ineffective. The corporate establishment had seen to that - as indeed, it had seen to all such previous attempts.

With war's end now calling for a clearing of conscience, BIS's method of achieving this was by stressing its somewhat euphemistic neutrality, while playing down its less palatable, but quintessential supranationality. Their annual report of 1946 - as quoted in the Times - stated: "It is noted that the Bank has continued to supply the principles of strict neutrality, but that circumstances have caused a further decline in the volume of its business". Further: "Wars are the worst cause of monetary convulsions, and the first condition for enjoying the benefits of an ordinary monetary system is to establish and maintain a reign of peace". In view of their recent previous history, the term 'irony' hardly does justice to the above statements!. This report was, incidentally, the last to be signed by its President, Thomas McKittrick: in June 1946 he was appointed Vice/Chairman of the Chase National Bank by its owners, the Rockefellers - presumably as a mark of gratitude for the assistance rendered to them by the BIS during his presidency.

In view of the somewhat puzzling fact that this now meant that there were in this post-war period three international financial/banking institutions - all with the self-evidently similar aim of resolving the world's serious economic problems - a brief, close look is called for in order to clarify the situation.

The first (and intriguing) fact to be noted here is that, whereas the IMF and The World Bank have been frequently and conspicuously in the public eye from birth, the BIS has adopted a low profile and remained uncommunicative. This was an expedient tactic for the latter to adopt - for two reasons: (1) it thus eluded any investigation into its previous financial dealings with the Third Reich; and (2) more importantly, by so diassociating itself from the IMF and World Bank, the latter would henceforth be widely (though erroneously) regarded as the sole guardians of the worldwide economy, thus allowing the BIS more latitude to follow the agenda set by the corporate establishment - to whom, it must be recalled, they owed their survival.

This ambivalent relationship between the IMF/World Bank vis-a-vis the BIS/commercial banks in the 70's is epitomised by Anthony Sampson in his book "The Money Lenders": "The commercial banks in the meantime had created a very different perspective, for the IMF now controlled much less of the world's money.

In 1966, the quotas which made up its capital amounted to 10% of the total world imports; but by '76 they made up only 4%"..."by '76 world annual deficits had reached $75 billion : of this, 7% financed by the IMF; 18% by other official international bodies (governments and World Bank) - remaining three-quarters financed by banks (commercial)". (Today, some two-and-a-half decades later, the board members of BIS, between them, control 95% of the money in circulation). The reason for this apparent taking over of such responsibility by the BIS from the IMF/World Bank is twofold: (1) the collapse of the Bretton Woods system of exchange convertibility in the early seventies exposed the irrelevance of the latter as agents for European reconstruction; and (2) the latter being statutorily-appointed agents of the UN, were therefore - ostensibly - accountable to a much wider constituency than the BIS, and therefore politically less manageable by the corporate establishment, whose primary aim in the aftermath of World War 2 was to ensure the unrestricted flow of American capital into Europe. A flow considerably eased by subsequent European integration, in which both NATO and the Bilderberg played a crucial role. This aim was furthered by means of the US Congressionally-authorised European Cooperation Act (ECA) of 1948, and implemented by its subsidiary, the European Payments Union (EPU) of 1950 - both under the aegis of the Marshall Plan of 1947. Predictably, the BIS was the institution chosen by the EPU to oversee this movement of capital (a point worthy of note here is that the head of the EPU at that time was one Richard Bissell, an economist who, years later, was to be the CIA Deputy Director of Planning overseeing the Bay of Pigs fiasco in April '61!).The BIS was now firmly ensconced in the heart of European integration, and was subsequently to play a critical role in the events leading to its (Europe's) eventual evolvement into the European Union, a bureaucratic politico-economic body occupying a position of crucial importance within the wider global hierarchy envisaged by the corporate establishment.

The significance of the American's key central role in this sequence of events is underscored by the fact that, in the aftermath of World War 2, they (the Americans) set up the Bundesbank in Frankfurt (in their zone of control), ensuring that the bank would be independent of government and follow a strict monetary policy - in effect, another Federal Reserve System. In 1948 they replaced the existing Reichmarks with approximately 11 billion Deutschmarks, and Germany's subsequent conduct vis-a-vis European integration must be viewed with this in mind. In any case, the fact remains that Germany's subsequent frequent delaying tactics enabled the dollar to consolidate its dominance. .....

Extract from an article by Joan Veon:
Understanding World Events and the Credit Crisis
Joan Veon - October 6, 2008


http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm#Mendez
http://www.cabiz.net/vincent/worldgovt.htm


Quote:
Taken from this PDF where you will
full details on the people in the chart:
http://breakfornews.com/offsitearchive/bankers.pdf



http://breakfornews.com/offsitearchive/bankers.pdf


Now here we are up to date
in a just released article:


Quote:
Gold Swap Signals the Roadmap Ahead

Friday, 23 July 2010 - By Gordon T Long

The news rocked the global gold market when an almost obscure line item in the back of a 216 page document released by an equally obscure organization was recently unearthed.

Thrust into the unwanted glare of the spotlight, the little publicized Bank of International Settlements (BIS) is discovered to have accepted 349 metric tons of gold in a $14B swap.

Why? With whom? For what duration? How long has this been going on? This raises many questions and as usual with all $617T of murky unregulated swaps, we are given zero answers. It is none of our business! .....

READ ON:
http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1279904400.php

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8138

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Listen from 26mins to 34 mins for extraordinary details
of what happened to the female lawyer who investigated
the minutes of the Carniege Foundation - Fintan


Quote:
The secret history of our downfall

Norman Dodd was interviewed in 1982 by G. Edward Griffin regarding
the time he spent as the head researcher for the Reece Committee.

This is a truly eye opening look into what the tax exempt foundations are
doing in the United States - their attempt to merge the Soviet System of
Government with the USA.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM

One key revealing aspect of the New World Order crowd -- made popular in conservative circles by the early literature of the John Birch Society circa 1960: the major tax-exempt foundations, since at least 1945, have been operating to promote an agenda that has little to do with charity, good works, or philanthropy.

The real objectives include the creation of a world-wide collectivist state which is to be ruled from behind the scenes by those same interests which control the foundations. The story is told by Norman Dodd who, in 1954, was the staff director of the Congressional Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations, known as the Reece Committee, in recognition of its Chairman, Congressman Carroll Reece. Mr. Dodd speaks from experience with conversations with the leaders of the great foundations of that period, some of whom were amazingly frank about their goals.

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MichaelC



Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
America is being stripped
of her assets and her citizens are being put in greater and greater
bondage through usury and taxation!
and the american people have only themselves to blame because it is they who allowed it to happen, mainly through a mistaken belief that they can get something for nothing - the foundation of all socialism.

BTW, the tax-exempt foundations referenced above are a very effective method for the NWO master criminals to control what is taught in schools and universities which of course leads to 'co-operative' editors for all media outlets. The master criminals thereby maintain total control of the propaganda machine, which is in my opinion the most powerful weapon they have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8138

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
We are not deceived by their pretenses to piety. We have seen
their kind before. They are the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of
the 20th century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions,
by abandoning every value except the will to power, they follow in the
path of fascism and Nazism and totalitarianism. And they will follow that
path all the way, to where it ends, in history's unmarked grave of
discarded lies.


G. W. Bush, declaring the War on Terror.

Of course, Bush is describing himself and those behind him.

I found a transcript of the Norman Dodd Video.

Here's an couple of extracts:

Quote:
......this investigation in the direction that it was moving, which would
have been an exposure of this Carnegie Endowment story and the Ford
Foundation and the Guggenheim and the Rockefeller Foundation, all
working in harmony....
http://gatewaygpg.tripod.com/gate12.htm


Quote:
How would you describe the motivation of the people who created the foundations, the big foundations in the very beginning? What was their motivation?

Their motivation, well, let’s take Mr. Carnegie as an example. His publicly declared, steadfast interest was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain. He was devoted to just putting the pieces back together again.

Would that have required the collectivism that they were dedicated to?

No, no, no. These policy of the, or the foundation’s allegiance to these un-American concepts are all traceable to the transfer of the funds over and into the hands of trustees, Mr. Griffin, not to men that had a hand in the creation of the wealth that led to the endowment as a use of that wealth for what we would call public purposes.

It was a subversion of the original intent then.

Oh yeah. Completely so. And that we got into the world traditionally of bankers and lawyers.

How do see that the purpose and the direction of the major foundations has changed over the years to the present? What is it today?

Oh, 100 percent behind meeting the cost of education such as it is presented through the schools and colleges of the United States on the subject of our history as proven already are original ideas to be no longer practical. The future belongs to a collectivist concept and there’s just no disagreement on it.

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MichaelC



Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
national
sales tax so that we can reduce our debt.


"Debt"? - to whom? Some to ordinary people and intstitutions holding government paper and a great deal to the owners of the Fed. This of course was the reason for the (100% unconstitional = illegal) creation of the IRS - to force at gunpoint interest payment on this same national 'debt'.

So we could regard a national sales tax as 'IRS-2'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MichaelC



Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

G8 (German) Intel ops stir the anti-Islamic pot.

They're running out of shit to stir in germany?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100809/ap_on_re_eu/eu_germany_mosque_closed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
howg



Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
They Want Us to Know: On Conspiracies and Cover-ups

Posted by Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall on @ 7:09 pm
Article printed from speakeasy: http://blogs.alternet.org/refugee
URL to article: http://blogs.alternet.org/refugee/2010/07/31/they-want-us-to-know-on-conspiracies-and-cover-ups/

The Transparent Conspiracy by Michael D. Morrissey: A Review



The Mass Psychology of Partial Disclosure

The Transparent Conspiracy is a collection of essays written between 2006 and 2010, mainly about the 911 and JFK conspiracies and cover up, with a short collection of poems on the same topic. Morrisey’s latest book is a definite departure from other conspiracy literature. Morrissey has no interest in proving or disproving either the 911 or the JFK conspiracy – he feels this territory is well-covered by other authors. The topic of this book is mass psychology. Morrissey believes our government’s propaganda arm (whatever they call it now) is fully aware that a well-managed conspiracy cover-up can have a very intimidating effect, which can be very effective in keeping the public docile and obedient.

The Government Wants Us to Know

Specifically he argues there is major value (from the government point of view) in disclosing a limited amount of information concerning government culpability in atrocities such as the JFK assassination and 911. He bases his view on something he calls “Transparency Theory” – thus his title The Transparent Conspiracy. He says the CIA has long recognized that “telling part of the truth is the best way to lie.” They even have a term for it: “white propaganda.” Morrissey argues that for the government to brazenly commit criminal acts can be quite effective in demoralizing and alienating the tuned-in segment of the population that fully comprehends the corrupt nature of our government institutions.

He then lays out the hypothetical question: if the reality of the 911 conspiracy were widely accepted by the American public, would they be capable of doing anything about it? Morrissey believes that at this point in history they would be powerless (that they lack the power to bring the culprits to trial or even impeach them). Which he contends is a powerful basis for demoralization and alienation.

Contrasting 911 with the JFK Assassination

He then contrasts the 911 conspiracy cover-up with the cover-up of the JFK assassination, in which years of advanced planning went into creating a fictional identity (as an unstable Marxist) for a US intelligence agent named Lee Harvey Oswald – and in which scores of witnesses were murdered and evidence secretly destroyed and/or fabricated.

In the case of 911 there was very limited – a few fictitious cell phone calls from a high altitude that weren’t technologically feasible in 2001 and some clumsily forged bin Laden videotapes. The government made no attempt to conceal that they were destroying evidence at Ground Zero – they simply loaded all the twisted steel onto trucks and shipped it to Long Island to be melted down into something else. The 911 Commission was more of a whitewash than a true cover-up.

Noam Chomsky’s Puzzling Position on Conspiracies

Morrissey’s essays also cover, at length, his correspondence with American’s pre-eminent dissident Noam Chomsky, regarding the JFK assassination conspiracy and cover-up. Morrisey, who has always been one of Chomsky’s greatest admirers, describes his initial dismay at his hero’s categorical rejection of the mountains of irrefutable evidence that the JFK assassination conspiracy originated at the highest levels of government. He was even more troubled, after their lengthy correspondence (published as Looking for the Enemy in 2008), at Chomsky’s inability to rationally justify his position. He initially tended to side with media critics who believe Chomsky plays some deliberate “left gatekeeping” function (having to do with right wing foundation funding). He now believes Chomsky more likely has other reasons – relating more to what is increasingly self-evident in the 911 Truth movement – that the endless investigation of government conspiracies playing little pragmatic role in the massive institutional change (such as the end of capitalism) which is the only hope for real and permanent change in the US.

Morrissey also touches on his correspondence with Vincent Salandria (published in 2007 as Correspondence with Vincent Salandria). Salandria, a “left leaning” Philadelphia lawyer, was the first to publicly challenge the Warren Commission (in 1965). Morrissey is also careful to credit Salandria’s ideas about the propaganda uses of a well-managed cover-up for helping to develop his own thinking.

The poems make a moving addendum to the essays. They convey quite poignantly Morrissey’s personal struggle with the despair and heartache of learning a government you believed to be fair and democratic is actually deeply corrupt.

62 year old psychiatrist, activist and author of a recently published memoir THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY ACT: MEMOIR OF AN AMERICAN REFUGEE. Which describes my decision in 2002 - owing to extensive government harassment for my political activities to close my 25-year Seattle practice and begin a new life in New Zealand. What commenced as unrelenting phone harassment and illegal break-ins progressed to attempts on my life and an affair with an undercover operative who railroaded me into a psychiatric hospital. See review in OpEdNews http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Psychiatrist-Searches-f-by-Michael-David-Morr-100812-950.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MichaelC



Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Morrissey argues that for the government to brazenly commit criminal acts can be quite effective in demoralizing and alienating the tuned-in segment of the population that fully comprehends the corrupt nature of our government institutions.

He then lays out the hypothetical question: if the reality of the 911 conspiracy were widely accepted by the American public, would they be capable of doing anything about it? Morrissey believes that at this point in history they would be powerless (that they lack the power to bring the culprits to trial or even impeach them). Which he contends is a powerful basis for demoralization and alienation.


doesn't 'demoralize' me one bit, makes me feel better for being aware of what is happening. And the reason that the American public 'does nothing about it' is because 99% of the populace seems to be reasonably content (i.e., sufficient food, housing, drugs, mindless/violent entertainment, etc)with things just the way they are!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 3184
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Close but no cigar for Morrissey. His book seems like an op within an op.
Yeah "they want you to know" but he misses many key points
that have been covered here on BFN especially well in the "911 Left Luggage Key" audio and others. You can know as much as you want,
yet when it lacks in research and integrity you are left with nothing.
His book seems to assume:
- We are powerless.
- Bushy Jr. 'dun 9/11
- Everything the mainstream 911/JFK Conspiracy sites proclaim
like explosives in the towers (talk about scaring your audience)
is probably true.
-We should all just forget about it like Chomsky.
- It's all the USA, all of the time


www.mdmorrissey.info



claims the govt. created an AIDS-like virus in 1969 Cool

https://sites.google.com/site/michaeldavidmorrissey/essays/02

More confusing 9/11 theories wooohooo!
https://sites.google.com/site/michaeldavidmorrissey/essays/39


Last edited by bri on Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:56 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 3184
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Divide N' Conquer...

http://911truthnews.com/michael-cosgrove-tabloid-gossip-stereotype-911-skeptics-say-assange-being-manipulated-by-cia-truth-news/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8138

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just Out!
You can read the whole book online.

( I found it worked best if I maxed
the resolution using the 1:1 button )


Quote:



The Nazi Roots of the ‘Brussels EU’

Read Online : http://www.reject-the-eu.co.uk/nazi-roots/chapter.html

Foreword and Introduction:

Chapter 1: Summarizing the evidence

Chapter 2: Walter Hallstein: Prominent Nazi Lawyer – And Key Architect of the ‘Brussels EU’

Chapter 3: The ‘The Greater Sphere Cartel’ and its organisational framework

Chapter 4: The Oil and Drug Cartel's attempt to consolidate its political power over Europe

Chapter 5: The Rule of the Brussels EU would End Centuries of Freedom and Independence in Great Britain

Chapter 6: Who’s Who in the “Brussels EU”

Chapter 7: Relay of Life

More Information: Books for further reading

http://www.reject-the-eu.co.uk/nazi-roots/chapter.html

http://www.reject-the-eu.co.uk/nazi-roots/further_reading.html

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 29, 30, 31 ... 35, 36, 37  Next
Page 30 of 37

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.