Flight 93 - Overview

[obeylittle]

[Rumpl4skn]

[heiho1]

Interesting series of Flight 93 related videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPGL9XimWCs&NR=1

[dilbert_g]

PREVIOUS video was removed, but THIS one exists.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7623

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc Added: April 21, 2006
(so hopefully it will stay up permanently)

Ultra-rare news footage from the crash site of United Flight 93 which has never been seen again since 9/11.



or here: www.Takeoverworld.info/vid/9-11_Flight_93_Rare_Footage_FoxNews.flv
(need FLV player or VLC)

[Lord Carpainter]

There was no plane crash in Shanksville. I believe that a missile may have been fired into the forest and the crater was made beforehand. Or perhaps a UAV of some sort crashed. 9/11 Researcher Terrorcell claims to have interviewed many eyewitnesses that support his theory that a small drone was involved.

The "Shoot Down" theory, as Rumpl stated, is a red herring. It was started by flight93crash.com, which has been outed as a government-run site. It was also fueled by the purposeful 'shot down the plane over Pennsylvania' slip made by Slipper McSlippery himself, Donald Rumsfeld.

If one looks at the photos, they will realize that no plane crashed in Shanksville. The dirt inside the crater was unburnt. The grass growing near the crater and some inside the crater was unburnt. A photographer on the scene couldn't smell any jet fuel, and groundwater was tested for jet fuel, none was found. No fuel-laden 757 crashed there.

Let's look at the evidence presented in this post..



Isn't it just a little too convenient that this engine scrap fits perfectly into the backhoe bucket? We already know that the FBI was running some of the excavation equipment, so seeing as it just happens to fit perfectly into this bucket, they could have simply lowered it down and snapped a photo. Plus, the engine looks rusted.. and where did the rest of the engine go? Since it supposedly buried that far under the ground, shouldn't it be coated in dirt? And what are those strange pieces of silver? They aren't from a United Airlines 757, that's for sure. Probably just put there to be props with the engine.



This picture took 4 years to release and the insulation is missing. Not credible. How did it survive without significant fire damage when the rest of the plane disintegrated?



This photo took 4 years to be released. It seems ridiculous to say that the rest of the plane disintegrated yet this piece survived perfectly with no significant fire damage.



What is with the wires and the piece of wood? Why are they in the crater? Why isn't the black box covered in dirt? The metal holding up the box makes this look like a staged photo.



Why is it not caked in dirt? We can see part of the manufacturer logo. The first letter. That's the key to exposing this photo. It should be 'A' for Allied Signal, since that was the manufacturer, but it's a Honeywell H. Planted!



911 Researcher Amanda Reconwith put this perp-manufactured evidence at 911 movement: http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=2592



AmandaReconwith also has proof that this piece of evidence was manufactured: http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=2616

As for the evidence of the hijackers, there is indication that these government-trained, government-funded dupes were never on any planes. Therefore, the Ziad Jarrah evidence must have been planted. The bandana is just ludicrous. An entire plane disintegrates, but these tiny objects survive without significant damage.

I believe Flight 93 ended up in Cleveland Airport that day. Delta 1989 was deliberately landed there to act as a cover for Flight 93 landing there. One news story reported Flight 93 landed, but the story was pulled quickly (Very unusual). Shoestring is too smart for the perps, though. In his article "The Cleveland Airport Mystery", he proved through reports that two planes landed in Cleveland Airport. One of them was reported to be Delta 1989. Many of the reports didn't identify the other plane, except for the AP report that was carried by WCPO. The plane was identified as Flight 93.

People in Shanksville heard a missile and some saw a missile or UAV. The Shanksville crash site was faked. There was no plane.

[/url]

[Grumpy]

Lord Carpainter

You are a complete and total KNOW-NOTHING idiot and a total waste of anyones time.

Grumpy

[Lord Carpainter]

[Rumpl4skn]

Grumpy's getting his period, leave him alone.

Hey Grumpy - I happen to have done the graphics work on a lot of Killtown's McClatchey accusations. In fact, I believe I pretty much created the whole issue (call me a stickler for reality), when I plotted her location on GoogleEarth a few years ago, and things didn't even come close to lining up - let alone display a smoke cloud that was already 700 yards across within 60 seconds of the "impact", according to Val (of course, she also swears "the plane flew right over" her house - another physical impossibility, even by the govt's version.)

At the risk of seeming as if I think McClatchey is a liar, let me just say that I think McClatchey's a liar. She's an opportunist in the least, a govt-complicit pawn most likely, and her photo has nothing to do with Flight 93's crash (assuming there was one). That's been proven, beyond a doubt. Btw, this analysis has nothing to do with the veracity of a Flight 93 crash, it's about the photo - which also has nothing to do with a Flight 93 crash.

Why not comment on the work here: http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6531#6531

Let's see what you got.

[Hombre]

Grumpy.

Grow up before someone shoves your face in! I have to agree with the above poster. You act like an 11 year old, anything but someone who claims to be retired. Maybe you just never got picked for any team in PE class or something.

Get a life.

Hombre'

[Grumpy]

Rumpl4skn

[Rumpl4skn]

[Grumpy]

Rumpl4skn

[Rumpl4skn]

[Grumpy]

Rumpl4skn

[Rumpl4skn]