I did not dispute that parts of the building fell on the Marriot
Fine.
So what is that standing in the background?
It's WTC2.
Still perfectly intact.
Parts of the top fell at free fall speed. As seen here.
The lower portions of the building haven't even begun to fall.
And that's the difference between free-fall and not free fall.
As I said, the claim the tower fell at free-fall rate is bizarre.
Now you can ask for video evidence in French, taken by a dwarf
whose parents were both left-handed. Or any other wriggle-out
device to try avoid having to deal with this obvious reality.
Goodbye. _________________ Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 3223 Location: Capacious Creek
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 1:25 am Post subject: Re: Fintan has really exposed himself, I have no doubts anym
hawkwind wrote:
Now I can officially thank Bri .... thank you sir ... no slight intended. Now let's talk about the topic and see where it goes ... I have my own opinion but who cares ... weeeeeeee!
- Hawk
I was just fishing for some discussion.
Quote:
Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~Henry David Thoreau
I'm glad I tossed the first line even if I caught a "troll".
I don't assume you live under a bridge Keenan.
If I had decided these events needed to happen, this is how I would do it.
Due to pragmatics, not just evil.
---Study the towers.
The idea that the towers were shodilly planned
and that someone took advantage
is not that far fetched.
One can also obviously see the difference
between a straight on and banked approach
in regards.
Of course, the Twins were
obviously bombed by the
Cheney Masons and/or Illuminati Kikes.
Or Kurt Russel from Stargate. Perhaps the
cigarette smoking man.
What a wonderful and convenient way to collapse though, if no people fell with it.
Perfect. Cinematic. Like a banana.
----Create a Illuminati/Conspiracy theme.
I would focus most of my attention here.
The Left and Right are easy.
These guys though, I'd fuck them up.
The Towers would shred themselves.
I could easily blame it on explosives.
And then split that theory up...and so on.
----------------------------------
At about 16 when I saw it happen
I knew something was up.
At 18, Alex came into my life.
I knew I had seen this guy before.
There was pressure. Are you LIHOP or MIHOP? Look at the evidence!
Consider how it was split up:
Lihop: Yeah Bush(Jr.) kinda semi by accident let the attack happen.
Mihop: CIA/Mossad/Illuminati/Draconians set Explosives/Nukes/Beams/Nanos
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 3223 Location: Capacious Creek
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 9:42 pm Post subject:
A bit of a ramble there...
I have one more thought I'd like to lay out.
If the perps knew that hitting Tower Two lower than Tower One
would cause it to collapse first, why not take advantage of a very
psychological "change up" of the order in this way.
Hard to prove...
Dr. Niels Harrit: There are no experts on nanothermite without connections to the military.
Dr. Niels Harrit: I believe there are about 20 samples out there, but I don't know exactly and I have no reason to care.
Dr. Niels Harrit: Very, very difficult to put an absolute number on that. Let us say 10 tons.
gulli.com: Who did this peer-reviews? Can you explain at least which kind of people it has been? Officials from your university?
Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 2950 Location: 36� 3'N x 86�40'W
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:59 pm Post subject:
Well, he is referring to Bldg 7 there, which was built in the 80's. _________________ "No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money."
Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 2950 Location: 36� 3'N x 86�40'W
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:02 pm Post subject:
And what an odd coincidence that the same guy was chosen to do the forensics on both the OK City bombing and on the Twin Towers.
I can't say how much I can trust his findings. _________________ "No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money."
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 3223 Location: Capacious Creek
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject:
Right I understand that: It is from the third tower documentary
So they loaded up 7 with silent explosives in the 80s?
That's what's laughable
Maybe they snuck the nanothermite right into the aluminum
of 1 and 2 in the 70s.
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 3223 Location: Capacious Creek
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:13 pm Post subject:
Rumpl4skn wrote:
I can't say how much I can trust his findings.
Yeah I noticed that too.
AND Waco.
But...FEMA is usually a standard company for these kinds of disasters.
And they don't have a very good track record of detailed, well defined reports.
I'd be more concerned about FEMA covering up aspects of the failure rather
than evidence of explosives. That would have clearly been discovered.
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 3223 Location: Capacious Creek
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:06 pm Post subject:
I am guilty of derailing this thread a bit, but it was only out of anger towards the A&E crew.
In light of current research into the towers, that there is no evidence for explosives and the planes had the means and angle to take them down, 9/11 seems to make a lot more sense. Doesn't it?
The "red herrings" for explosives.
The MIHOP/LIHOP divide. How perfect is that strategy for the CIA in this context?
15 people wouldn't plant explosives in a building while people were still in it, even for massive amounts of money and years of MKULTRA torture.
However, I guarantee I could find 15 to lecture and lie for years on end for good money.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Now let's talk about the topic and see where it goes ... I have my own opinion but who cares ... weeeeeeee!
