FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Audio: Hot Facts For A Cold Case Murder
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 45, 46, 47
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
eveknowsthetruth



Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 465

PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was out of pocket for a few days for a meeting regarding Joan's case.

One of the people I spoke with was a retired US Marshall who was familiar with the system in MA. He commented that MA is the most corrupt state concealing malfeasance. He was not surprised by the obstacles I have encountered.

Bottom line: Source documents debunk the Paradiso boat theory promoted by the authorities and the Websters. That narrows the scope of suspects to the four people who maintained the boat theory and disregarded exculpatory evidence in their possession; Tim Burke, Andrew Palombo, Carmen Tammaro, and George Webster.

The only one in that group who could possibly have a personal motive is George Webster. He fits most of the criteria about the man seen with Joan at Logan, a lead George concealed.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
eveknowsthetruth



Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 465

PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The latest issue of Unsolved Magazine has a summary article about Joan's case. It is also an article feature posted on the magazine website. Follow the link below.

http://unsolvedmagazine.com/joan-webster/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8360

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2020 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congratulations Eve!!

A prestige magazine and a great article. Wink

You managed to convey all the facts and build a
convincing picture of cover-up and concealment.

Dynamite was this:

    the Burke letter received after the interview had no ambiguity on the
    manner of death
    . Tr. Andrew Palombo and Sgt. Carmen Tammaro of the
    MSP both knew the manner of Joan’s death more than seven years prior to
    her remains surfacing.


Ouch!
That's what they call a line of inquiry
you could pursue Mr. Essex County D.A.

Burke you destroyed in a few sentences, lol :

    "Burke had not received an unsolicited letter from Bond on January 5, 1983, as claimed.
    Bond mailed the letter on January 10, 1983, after meeting with the MSP.
    Police still had not received it when they interviewed Bond on January 14, 1983.
    ADA Burke and Tr. Palombo filed false documents with the courts. "

And you nailed the four key individuals: George Webster
Tim Burke, Andrew Palombo and Carmen Tammaro

And you nailed the current DA!

All in all, a signature article that places Joan's case among the
leading systemic prosecutorial malfeasance cases in the USA.

yahoo

I put it out on Twitter - FB also:



JUSTICE DENIED IN JOAN WEBSTER MURDER
AS D.A. SITS ON KEY EVIDENCE
https://bit.ly/3dITBnc
ALSO https://bit.ly/3dRFITQ



JUSTICE DENIED IN JOAN WEBSTER MURDER AS D.A. SITS ON KEY EVIDENCE
READ: https://unsolvedmagazine.com/joan-webster/

On a cold Saturday, in November 1981, Joan Webster, 25, disembarked
from Eastern Airlines flight 960 at Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts,
and promptly disappeared - until her remains were uncovered nearly a
decade later.

The second-year Harvard Graduate School of Design student had waved to
classmates at the luggage carousel, but she stepped outside to the cab line
and vanished. The news of Joan’s disappearance shocked the community.
Joan, the petite student with long, dark hair and a bright smile was popular
and well-liked. Everyone wanted to know, what happened to Joan?


READ ON: https://unsolvedmagazine.com/joan-webster/

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
eveknowsthetruth



Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 465

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2020 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Fintan,

Thank you for your kind words. After years of piecing Joan's case together, it became crystal clear the investigation was a hoax.

Unsolved Magazine is published by a private investigator. Everything in the article was vetted with the documents confirming every detail. There is no speculation.

I am not looking at motive at this point. No one denies there are bad actors in the system. Boston had an abundance at the time and current authorities are interested in shielding malfeasance instead of administering justice. I am focused on intent rather than motive. The intent of the four key individuals was to pin Joan's murder on a scapegoat. That is abundantly clear.

Projecting guilt is not new. Think of Susan Smith. Fintan, you also pointed to another Boston case, Carol Stuart. Her case was handled by Suffolk County, Tim Burke's office. No surprise, ADA John Dawley, current custodian of Joan's case, also had a connection to the Stuart case. Thank you for posting that article a few pages back.

Joan's case was corrupt. Then you have people like Bob Mueller overseeing aspects of Joan's case. It appears Mueller's function was to shield actions of authorities. Apparently, the system has their own mechanizations to justify anything the authorities do.

It leaves the most chilling question to answer. Why did George Webster, intend to pin the brutal murder of his daughter on someone he knew was not guilty of the crime?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8360

PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2020 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
eveknowsthetruth:

I am focused on intent rather than motive.

The intent of the four key individuals was
to pin Joan's murder on a scapegoat.


That's a key discrimination there: intent.

Because it would seem that regardless of the
still not prosecuted crime of the murder of Joan.....

There is prima facie evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course
of justice
in the investigation by misdirecting and leading the inquiry
on an elaborate false trail.

Some of the acts committed in the course of this agenda may even
meet the threshold for accessory after-the-fact to murder. Only a
proper investigation of the perversion of justice can resolve that.

It's a separate criminal issue from the murder.

The officials can claim an insufficiency of evidence
to enable reopening the murder inquiry.

But there is no lack of evidence for the conspiracy to pervert justice.

And such an investigation might as a bonus resolve the murder.

So their stonewalling don't look so good, when the facts say that
"Tr. Andrew Palombo and Sgt. Carmen Tammaro both knew the
manner of Joan’s death
more than seven years prior to her
remains surfacing." That brings in Steven Broce and the others.

That's the sore thumb -sticking out. That's the red flag.

That fact is hard evidence of conspiracy to conceal or to murder.

These people don't have many vulnerabilities. But that's one.

You know like a tinned food can has a pull ring?

That prior knowledge is the pull ring that can draw
anybody into pulling the lid off this can of worms.
.

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.


Last edited by Fintan on Tue May 26, 2020 4:33 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
eveknowsthetruth



Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 465

PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2020 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Fintan,

You hit the nail on the head. The key to resolving Joan's case is looking at the investigation itself.

Yes, conduct by authorities during the investigation should fall under the criminal code if justice is truly applied equally. Filing false documents to the courts, making false statements to federal authorities, fabricating evidence, putting forward false witnesses, and hiding exculpatory evidence are all felonies.

That makes part 2, getting the case properly reviewed, a daunting task. ADA John Dawley holds sole power. He knows Tim Burke and does not want to focus on him. He advised I not probe so deeply. He was too late. Documents were scattered and hidden. I am sure no one thought anyone could get to the records, or make sense of them if they did. We are supposed to "trust" the authorities, and certainly who would ever challenge the Websters.

Is there complicity? Absolutely. These four individuals are persons of interest for Joan's murder, and/or an accessory after the fact. George Webster wished me to "DIE" for raising questions about the discrepancies in source documents. Dirty cops and dirty prosecutors are not unheard of. Involvement of the father of the murder victim is the most problematic for me. His intent was to blame a scapegoat for his daughter's brutal murder when he had exculpatory evidence to know the story was false.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 45, 46, 47
Page 47 of 47

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.