WTC South Tower - Wrong Tower Fell First

DeepLogos · Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:29 am Post subject:

WTC 1 & 2 occupants:

DeepLogos · Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:37 am Post subject:

Interesting as to WTC generally (cursory):

Fintan · Site Admin Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 6098

Here's a great set of close-up photos of the World Trade Center site,
reportedly taken on September 13th. I have mirrored them on the
BreakForNews server so we have a permanent copy.

A useful resource for figuring out what happened.

DeepLogos · Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:42 pm Post subject:

Some really "great" WTC photos here, including panorama shots.

http://www.conservationtech.com/MAIN-TOPICS/5-NYC-World-Trade/WTC-Home.htm

Should these be mirrored as well perhaps? Some are rather large (panoramas).

-DL-

Fintan · Site Admin Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 6098

DeepLogos

A Joshua Leinsdorf article about the WTC, the Port Authority, Nelson Rockefeller and the WTC architect.... Here >>
----------
BTW, this was Peter Eisenman's WTC suggestion (post 9/11-2001)

Well, it doesn't look like it is designed to take the impact of an airliner, it looks like it's about to collapse...

http://www.thecityreview.com/nytimdes.html

-DL-

Continuity · Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:14 am Post subject:

DL said:

bornfree · Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 509

[quote="DeepLogos"]A Joshua Leinsdorf article about the WTC, the Port Authority, Nelson Rockefeller and the WTC architect.... [url=http://www.leinsdorf.com/worldtradecenter.htm]Here >>[/url]
----------
BTW, this was Peter Eisenman's WTC suggestion (post 9/11-2001)

[img]http://www.thecityreview.com/nytdes3.gif[/img]

Well, it doesn't [i]look[/i] like it is designed to take the impact of an airliner, it looks like it's about to [i]collapse[/i]...

http://www.thecityreview.com/nytimdes.html

-DL-[/quote]

perhaps its meant to confuse future pilots as to exactly where to aim the plane? ...missle, pod, hologram

Rumpl4skn · Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:55 pm Post subject:

Design for the WTC was provided by Minoru Yamasaki & Assoc. Emery Roth & Sons served as the architect of record. Since these people have nothing to hide, they should provide the blueprints of the WTC, for all to see. This will quell any misunderstanding regarding the facts of the collapse to be established and corrected. In fact, both companies should put the entire set of plans on the internet.

DeepLogos · Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:28 pm Post subject:

dilbert_g · Guest

Some basics as I see them:

Assuming this diagram is correct

Then IF the building were to weaken due to crash and fire, it would have toppled towards that corner.

Instead, it collapsed symmetrically, all the way down, as if the opposite corners were equally damaged. I think that's equally powerful as "the wrong building fell first" -- though that seems true as well, shit happens sometimes. One person gets shot 10 times and lives, another gets a slight whack on the head and dies instantly.

Continuity · Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:15 am Post subject:

Gary said:

Hocus Locus · Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:22 am Post subject:

dilbert_g · Guest

Might find interesting. Endless debates on Free Republic before they banned Libertarians like "einstein".

First I was reading Schoenman (Socialist) here, about how WTC93 was orchestrated with patsies
http://www.takingaim.info/wtc93.html

and I googled the title of an article he mentioned and found a similar post on of all places Sean Hannity's forum, and DETAILED full articles and discussion on of all places Free Republic.

on WTC1993 and OKC
including Original long articles from NYT and LAT on Emad Ali Salem
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b3c830e34de.htm

on the Media and whether Chomsky is a Libertarian or Commie
Chomsky's proof [Free Republic]
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b3baabe7d4e.htm

Pentagon Report: Destruction in OKC caused by 5 Seperate Bombs
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b1aa4cb0517.htm

Listing of previous threads
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b20b28f4ff1.htm

I know this will probably take too long to read the entire thread.

One other thing that was anthropoligically interesting, is how Freepers were ON TO THIS during the Clinton era. Then there seems to have been some changeover in membership and they began to "circle the wagons" around the guv'mint after Bush's election, to the point that now criticism of the right wing guv'mint and Republicans is considered SHOCKING, by newer members.

StillDiggin · Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Posts: 88 Location: Michigan

When we refer to the towers as falling in the wrong order, this is based on the span of time between "impact" and "collapse."

In the spirit of this forum's topic, I would like to ask a sub-question.

If we were to base the statement with respect to the "plan," would it still hold true?

In other words, did the perpetrators plan for the south tower to "collapse" first, or did something go wrong? And if so, what was it that went wrong?

Conversely, if this order was part of the plan, why would the south tower need to fall first?