9/11 Audio: Twin Towers Built for Demo

[Christophera]

[aAzzAa]

[Hombre]

Again Gam speaks:

[aAzzAa]

14/15 seconds?





There's flashes mentioned too. Some think it was explosions, and someone suggests aliminium.

[aAzzAa]

You'll need Quicktime to view this, but it is obvious there are squibs here, some ten floors below where the collapse is happening.

http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/squibs_and_streamers.mov

What's the explanation behind that? Gam? Stann?

[aAzzAa]

Wonder if NIST and their computer animations had something as interesting as this to watch. Click on link to open up a series of photos that show lines of explosives going off. I say explosives, but perhaps Gam and Stann can give their expert explanation here.

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/evidence_of_explosives.htm

[Gamolon]

[Gamolon]

[aAzzAa]

[aAzzAa]

Just think about what Stann said earlier, Gam. He doesn't believe Bin Laden was responsible for the collapse of those towers. The people that were didn't mind 3000 people perishing. What kind of people would they be Gam? To what lengths would they go? What's at stake? Oil, wars , and profit? Imagine if the collapse of the towers was linked to the ongoing wars, and tally up the number of dead so far. Man, if they wanted to hide and confuse the so called evidence, what do you reckon dude, could they?

You've seen how the film industry can clear the internet of any new films that people host on their blogs. It's a piece of piss creating the reality "they" want created.

Now I agree that a concrete core isn't necessary. But how exactly do I simply agree with you? The evidence is all but gone. The blueprints are copies, and you and Chris slug out your interpretations.

[Christophera]

[Hombre]

[Gamolon]

Afetr some investigating, I found this little tidbit.

Let's take a trip down memory lane when Chris' core was at it's infancy. I suggest you folks who think Chris' theory is nothing more than a "moving goalpost" fest, have a look at it.

http://letsrollforums.com/wtc-demo-c4-coated-t985.html?t=985

Chris' claims he saw a video discussing the cores of the towers. That's right. THE CORES. Not just one core. Not JUST the core of WTC1 as he states now in his disclaimer, but both cores.

There is never any mention of WTC1's core being different than WTC2's core in this thread. There is never any mention of the massive redesign of the core. He spoke of both towers as being almost the same structure.

There is even an eyewitness that speaks of the same issue that I bring up about there not being room for his core. The person name is 4thecheeze. It's post #144. He worked there and describes the same lobby that my coworker described when he worked there. The elevators were close to the walls and could not fit Chris' core walls.

http://letsrollforums.com/wtc-demo-c4-coated-t985p15.html

If Chris saw this documentary as he claims and gets all this evidence and information from it, then why does it keep changing whenever someone provides evidence that his core couldn't have existed.

The fact is he argued that the cores were the same from the beginning and then when he was pushed into a corner about elevator access , he changes his tune to fit the new evidence. Why the change if he got his information from the documentary? Did the documentary change since he saw it last?

Why the lie about his engineer friend, Mr. Harold Hill? Why does Chris say early on that his friend saw the SAME documentary as Chris did, yet know he says the Mr. Hill saw a different one? Why the lie Chris?

Hey aAzzAa, since you seem to be hard pressed to find anyone that worked in the towers to ask about the lobby elevator access, why don;t you contact Mr. Hill and explain Chris' theory to him and how Chris is using his written declaration as supporting proof. See what he says.

Where is all Chris' horseshit in the above thread about the core redesign? He also talks about the reason for the delay in building the tower cores. NOT because of the redesign of WTC2's, but something totally different. See if you can find it.

[aAzzAa]

[aAzzAa]

Does anybody here actually know where Gamolon stands regarding 9/11? Has he ever given his own position away in the 400 pages of this thread?
I've seen him slag off anything to do with conspiracy. Would you like to spend a post telling me where you stand Gam, about the terrorist attack, America's ignorance about it prior to 9/11 and your views on the right to keep evidence hidden? Come on Gam let's get to know you.