FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
MySpace = Wikipedia // Blogspot = YouTube = Google = free
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
MattMarriott



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 125

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:44 pm    Post subject: MySpace = Wikipedia // Blogspot = YouTube = Google = free Reply with quote

MySpace = Wikipedia = Illuminati censorship //// Blogspot = YouTube = Google = free speech

Part of the short story of the web has been the process where the Illuminati keep buying sites that successfully offered a platform for free speech or to search for information.
There was ONE exception (1), the miracle of Google (2).

Notes

(1) Historic post from 2004, about the failed illuminati attempts to control Google:
Can you imagine the internet without Google ? Where to find information if the only available search would be the filtered channels of Yahoo & Co ?
Google played a key role. It was a miracle that it has survived all the attempts to destruct the last free search engine in the internet.
Will it also survive this one ?

04/27/2004 3:36:04 PM PDT by Truth666
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1125573/posts
Ironically posted in the last official refuge (board of US government supporters) of the official 9/11 perps (US government) in the internet...

(2) Parallel information societies in end times - since 1998, when the last trumpets echoed
http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/t20245-parallel-information-societies-in-end-times-since-1998-when-the-last-trumpets-echo.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
navari
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:58 pm    Post subject: Re: MySpace = Wikipedia // Blogspot = YouTube = Google = fre Reply with quote

MattMarriott wrote:
Part of the short story of the web has been the process where the Illuminati keep buying sites that successfully offered a platform for free speech or to search for information.

MattM, I request that you make your points without referring to the
"illuminati." It just kills all credibility.
Back to top
DrewTerry
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Navari:

Who died and made you Chief Censor?

If you don't like what MattM posts - PAY NO ATTENTION TO IT!!!
Back to top
navari
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DrewTerry wrote:
Navari:

Who died and made you Chief Censor?

If you don't like what MattM posts - PAY NO ATTENTION TO IT!!!

Smile Smile Smile Smile

You're not trying to censor my censorship, are you? Wink

Actually, my statement was put in the form of a request, not a demand. If
it was a demand, then I'd agree with your point. But surely, saying things
like the "illuminati did it" or "it's all the jews fault" or similar statements don't
necessarily add to ones credibility in today's climate. It's a factor, a variable,
like it or not. If MattM wants to continue making statements like this, then
I just may decide to ignore his posts. However, I like the substance of
this post, and would hate to see others turn-off and not see the larger
and more important point because of the way that the information is
presented.

Aw, fuck-it, I am your GOD....sorry, but I can't deny it any longer Smile
Back to top
MattMarriott



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 125

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

navari wrote:

Actually, my statement was put in the form of a request, not a demand.
... saying things like the "illuminati did it" or "it's all the jews fault"


I see it as a request also.
Now you are putting two things together in the style of the web of disinformation set up by the illuminati.

It's "illuminati did it" NOT "it's ... the jews fault".

The same web of dsinformation that is in charge of connecting the word "illuminati" with what they are NOT.
So, it's not because the web of dsinformation tries to fake one word that I am going to stop using it, since it is the right word.
Or do you know any better one?

The Web of Disinformation set up by the Illuminati
http://illuminati-web-of-disinformation.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
navari
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 4:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MattMarriott wrote:
It's "illuminati did it" NOT "it's ... the jews fault".

To an outsider, it looks exactly the same.....Cookoo, Fruitloop, etc.

MattMarriott wrote:
So, it's not because the web of dsinformation tries to fake one word that I am going to stop using it, since it is the right word.
Or do you know any better one?

My suggestion (and it is only a suggestion, and it only represents my
opinion....okay Drew? Wink ) is to use Ruling Elite, or Global Elite, or perhaps
Corporate-Government Elite, or something similar.

I don't buy that it is some sort of cult or group who even has similar
beliefs. For me, it's basically a bunch of super rich and their stooges
working exclusively toward their self-interest with absolutely no regard for
anyone else.

It is just when I hear Illuminati, all I can think of is cults and Alex Jones
hiding out in the bushes at Bohemian Grove. Everything else that you might
have to say is tainted by this....at least it is for me.

Finally, I gotta tell ya that I feel like I'm loosing all sorts of credibility, not
that I had any to begin with, by even engaging in this conversation.
Back to top
DrewTerry
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Navari:

Request, demand, prefer, insist, desire, require -- whatever -- I said nothing about the words that you used.

If you think it would be more credible for whatever reason, then say that.

So instead of:
Navari wrote:
MattM, I request that you make your points without referring to the "illuminati." It just kills all credibility.

It could be:
Quote:
MattM, if you make your points without referring to the "illuminati" it would have far more credibility with me.

As for this:
Navari wrote:
My suggestion (and it is only a suggestion, and it only represents my opinion....okay Drew? Wink)

Mock me all you want - I pay no more attention to it.
Back to top
obeylittle



Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 442
Location: Middle o' Mitten, Michigan Corp. division of United States of America Corp. division of Global Corp.

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why not just use names instead of labels? Why not refer to groups as they are named (commonly by what they do or work as), rather than are arbitrarily labeled?

Start with me... my name is Mark. I'm not easily labeled and even if you were to pin me down with a label, no one will understand you.

Reason follows logic. Try it, no one will question or attack you for that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Craig W



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 330

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

navari wrote:

Finally, I gotta tell ya that I feel like I'm loosing all sorts of credibility, not
that I had any to begin with, by even engaging in this conversation.


I know exactly what you mean, nav. But don't worry about credibility lost. Anyone with half a brain knows what you meant.

"Matt" seems to specialise in strange posts that are intelligible primarily to himself. I have seen him post the same stuff on several forums and few people seem to respond - suggesting that they are either perplexed or see it as nonsense. Most of his posts on here go the same way and he rarely responds to the posts of others. I guess he is just happy ploughing a lone furrow.

I see where Drew is coming from but I think the disagreement is a storm in a tea cup and is really pretty pointless (just my opinion, no side taken).

Cool

_________________
"Nothing can trouble you but your own imagination." ~ Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jirons



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 172

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Part of the short story of the web has been the process where the Illuminati keep buying sites that successfully offered a platform for free speech or to search for information.
There was ONE exception (1), the miracle of Google (2).


Really?

Aren't we moving towards a Google that knows more about you?

Search terms and IP address stored for ever and a day. It doesn't look like moving against the elite to me.

For now I'd suggest www.scroogle.org as having all the advantages and none of the privacy infringements (I hope!). Long may it last.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James D



Joined: 16 Dec 2006
Posts: 897

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 11:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So how long before they take over BFN?

This is a platform for free speach, isn't it?

Maybe They already have!
(cue Twylight zone music!!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
navari
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jirons wrote:
[For now I'd suggest www.scroogle.org as having all the advantages and none of the privacy infringements (I hope!).

Thanks for the link....I can't believe I wasn't aware of these guys.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.