FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
THE AIR ATTACK ON NEW YORK.
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps General Investigation
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
malcolm kirkman



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:01 pm    Post subject: THE AIR ATTACK ON NEW YORK. Reply with quote

Flight 175 did not hit the south twin.
A remote controlled ex-military 767 did.
That plane left Offutt AFB in the early hours of 9/11.
All those wishing further and better details, simply need only ask.

_________________
Fraoch Eilean - The Heathery Isle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Continuity



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 1716
Location: Municipal Flat Block 18A, Linear North

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
All those wishing further and better details, simply need only ask.

OK, I'll bite - state your sources.

Welcome to BFN, BTW.

_________________
The rule for today.
Touch my tail, I shred your hand.
New rule tomorrow.

Cat Haiku
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
malcolm kirkman



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How long have you got = where to start?
I started by realising that 175 could not have hit the south tower.
I invited all comers to come up with a viable 'hijack' scenario.
It can't be done.
Half the 'hijackers' still alive etc etc.
I've seen all the scenarios off. Remote control, crew compliance, et al.
We need to start there. You need to see that 11, 77, 93 qnd 174 were just the cover story.
First step is to understand that 175 didn't hit tower 2.
The best way to realise this is for you to come up with a viable scenario for the 'hijack' story.
When you accept that, we go to step 2.
Thanks for the welcome.

_________________
Fraoch Eilean - The Heathery Isle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
internetchatradio



Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 4
Location: argentina

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 8:46 am    Post subject: i agree Reply with quote

the plane is not a jet airliner abd i can confirm that it was a military aircraft look at the belly.
_________________
www.internetchatradio.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
malcolm kirkman



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 1:41 pm    Post subject: Re: i agree Reply with quote

internetchatradio wrote:
the plane is not a jet airliner abd i can confirm that it was a military aircraft look at the belly.

That's right.
Next, where did this plane come from?
It took off from Offutt AFB at about 03.45 Nebraska time.
Why Offutt?
1. The ‘hijack’ planes did not crash into the twins. If you want the evidence of this, I will provide it separately.
2. If it was not those planes, what planes did it and where did they come from?
3. I say that the actual attack planes left Offutt AFB at 3.30 am their time and flew by remote control due east to NYC.
4. My evidence for that is that Raytheon did it in August 2001, as a ‘dry run’. They flew a passenger jet, take off – flight around – landing. (Der Spiegel).
5. Raytheon deal in small executive jets, there is no reason for them to fly large passenger planes by remote control.
6. There is a very good reason for Raytheon not to interest themselves in flying passenger planes by remote control, because it is against the law,
7. The law requires that the passengers on any flight, have the flight crew present themselves to the passengers, by standing by the entrance door. This is to reassure the passengers, that the crew are not hung over or worse.
8. No flight crew by the door = no flight.
9. Raytheon could have no legitimate reason for flying a large passenger plane by remote control.
10. The ‘computer’ floors in both towers, are evidence of homing beacons.
11. I say that only a strengthened military version of a civilian passenger plane could have hit so hard. If you want the evidence for this, I will provide it separately.
12. I say Offutt AFB for the following reasons.
13. It is a joint civilian/military installation.
14. Boeing and Raytheon are surely there.
15. Boeing has been the subject of RICO law suits for over a decade.
16. The military mind would not stretch to murdering their own people. If you want evidence of this, I will provide it separately.
17. The military prefer daylight take offs.
18. A daylight take off is not possible, because of the alterations done to the outside of the plane.
19. Even without alterations someone in the control tower, or some civilian ‘anorak’, might recognise the attack planes.
20. In order to get a night time take off from a military airfield, some compelling reason must be given.
21. Private civilian executive jets began arriving at dawn on 9/11, because of a celebrity golf tournament that day.
22. Warren Buffet was persuaded out of retirement to host one last celebrity golf tournament.
23. Buffet was a patsy. If you want separate evidence of this, I will provide it.
24. Neocons are involved in paedophilia. If you want evidence of this I will provide it separately.
25. Offut AFB is twenty minutes away from Boystown, Omaha.
26. Boystown is steeped in allegations of paedophilia. Things occurred in the Twin Towers apartment block in Omaha, which is midway between the executive jet landing at Offutt and Boystown, Ten minutes from either location. If you want evidence of this, I will provide it separately.
27. There’s already enough here for reasonable suspicion = a warrant.
28. I’m confident more will be uncovered anon.

Is there enough here to interest you?

_________________
Fraoch Eilean - The Heathery Isle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
micpsi



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not really. (stifles yawn). It's all speculation and circumstantial evidence we have seen cobbled together on a dozen other 9/11 websites.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
malcolm kirkman



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since when has a fact been called speculation?
_________________
Fraoch Eilean - The Heathery Isle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
stallion4



Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 12:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

micpsi wrote:
Not really. (stifles yawn). It's all speculation and circumstantial evidence we have seen cobbled together on a dozen other 9/11 websites.

ditto

_________________
"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets." ~Travis Bickle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stallion4



Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stallion4 wrote:
micpsi wrote:
Not really. (stifles yawn). It's all speculation and circumstantial evidence we have seen cobbled together on a dozen other 9/11 websites.

ditto

To clarify, I've seen this all before. Nothing groundbreaking here. So ditto to the bit about having seen this "cobbled together on a dozen other 9/11 websites".

_________________
"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets." ~Travis Bickle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
malcolm kirkman



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stallion4 wrote:
stallion4 wrote:
micpsi wrote:
Not really. (stifles yawn). It's all speculation and circumstantial evidence we have seen cobbled together on a dozen other 9/11 websites.

ditto

To clarify, I've seen this all before. Nothing groundbreaking here. So ditto to the bit about having seen this "cobbled together on a dozen other 9/11 websites".

There's nothing like telling total lies, is there?
Where have you heard the name Offutt AFB before?
Answer = nowhere. That means you are both LIARS.

_________________
Fraoch Eilean - The Heathery Isle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
stallion4



Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Google:

Paul Bonacci+Offutt AFB

Raytheon+Offutt AFB+9/11

Warren Buffet+Offutt AFB+9/11

Eyes roll

_________________
"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets." ~Travis Bickle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
malcolm kirkman



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Where do any of those sites mention that the attack planes left Offutt by remote control, in the middle of the night?
Thanks for the links anyway.
I thought I was on my own on this.

_________________
Fraoch Eilean - The Heathery Isle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps General Investigation All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.