FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Grand Unification Theory - The Resonance Project

Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> Understanding Our Reality
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:57 am    Post subject: Grand Unification Theory - The Resonance Project Reply with quote

This is physics like you've never seen, well worth checking out,
even if science is not your thing.

Nassim Haramein of The Resonance Project Foundation has a
way with explaining his concepts in a fun easy to grasp way.

The synergetic - fractal nature of the geometry of space has
been applied to our understanding of physics, giving us quite
a different picture of whats really going on.

His new paper 'The origin of Spin' applies this new model to
to Einstein's Field Equations with promising results.

You can find more @ http://www.theresonanceproject.org

This is the dual torus^, why have one doughnut when you can have two Very Happy

Google video - Crossing the Event Horizon

A brilliant introduction to these geometries can be found in this video,
Nassim has a great way of describing complex physics in plain language
and with a lotta laughs. Laughing


~"“True observation begins when devoid of set patterns, and freedom of expression occurs when one is beyond systems.”"~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Grand Unification Theory - The Resonance Project Reply with quote

just0: Thanks very much!! Very Happy Wink Razz

I feel you are correct to say we will soon see breakthroughs and resolutions to existing puzzling inconsistencies and uncertainties;

Each day of evolutionary NOW energy and change in our time corresponds to (1=20) days in the evolutionary period 1913-1932.

• The rate of evolutionary change has increased in Time;
More people complete more aspects per 86,400 seconds per day;

• We are human; speeding up rate of change will 'feel' faster;

For my own curiosity:
just0 wrote:
His new paper 'The origin of Spin' applies this new model to Einstein's Field Equations with promising results.

1) what is the implied by 'ORIGIN OF SPIN'?
2) Is that THE origin (as in Godhead or Fountainhead) ORIGIN?
3) Our solar system/galaxy/universe/spacetime origin?
4) Other ?

What claims make the search so compelling to figure it out?

• Search for a single solvable universal "THEORY OF EVERYTHING" is alive;

• What do we believe there is to know about ORIGIN that is to know to compelling? (Or else not 'real'...)

• It seems like an 'impossible goal' from where we are, to be such an effectively limiting goal of impossibility that it retards progress by adhering blindly to old paradigms?

drewterry to Marlin wrote:
Hi Marlin - thank you for your comments the other day.

1) Has it been since +-1986 you have waited for the WSM to attract serious attention?
• People believe in particles with such conviction they are building new accelerators;

2) Was there a time you realized you would be waiting patiently for conscious evolution to 'catch up' to the concept?
• I feel our soul or spirit is primary to consciousness is primary to awareness is primary to experience;

3) Awareness to the issue previously unaware does not do anything to promote the cause, and can hurt the cause, by implication of stated intent (it 'is' thereafter it would either live or die);

• what chance will science, etc. will do to throw out what is wrong knowledgewise, to pave the way for new consciousness;

• what resonates as truth is always first disregarded, then in the collective before it is considered, then rejected, then reconsidered and then finally to be accepted?

You can find more @ http://www.theresonanceproject.org
This is the dual torus^, why have one doughnut when you can have two Very Happy

• The image on the right of both 'donuts'
• 2nd donut is the 'reflection' in the image of (in reflection)?;


KnotAnxious wrote:
• When we focus our attention we create 'now' the 'unthought known' of our mind:

a) what is our stated intention, for any given moment and aspect of that moment,
compared to;
b) the inference for 'now' as the inferred by the opposite of the stated intention?

The focus of our mind as our 'stated intention' is relatively simple to see for yourself by checking to the 'stated intention' compared to the inference implied by the stated intention - if ones thoughts align with what we stated as 'now' not future or past, then we have 'now'
Back to top

Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey drew, good to hear your excited about the breakthroughs. But I think
it's starting to get too predicteable Laughing

I dunno how to answer some of your points, but I'll try give you a bit
of my understanding of what this GUT means.

The 'Origin of spin' shows that the 'missing' energy of the universe is
from a torque effect which is absent from Einstein's field equations.
So applying the vortex toroidal structure to the ol' curved space time
model shows that space-time is the powerhouse of all energy in the
universe, simply because it pushes and pulls continousely pumping and
oscillating, In and Out.

This means that the so called 'void' or empty space is actually primary
to the energy, everything can be then thought of as a fractal subdivision
of the energy of that 'nothingness'. Each time spinning into new vortex
structures, just like the stream producing eddies as the rocks split the
flow up into larger or smaller subdivisions of the flow.

Hehe, It all sounds a bit hazey, for a proper explaination check into the
links, theres a full paper on the origin of spin and also a layman version
linked to in the article below.

A Unified Field Theory-Haramein-Rauscher
A Solution to the long-sought quest for a Unified Field Theory Announced

The NanoTechnology Group Inc. has been awaiting the opportunity to announce the publication of this new work on a Unified Field Theory , which takes Einstien's equations to the next level and unifies gravity with all four of the forces. In April 2004, it was my honor to personally meet Nassim Haramein and discuss this exciting work. Please review the technical paper and the layman's paper for an understanding of the theory which must stand on the merits of the mathematical equations. TNTG Inc. is just the messenger for the announcement of this work, which should not be considered as an endorsement of the theory. Our interest is in providing access to published scientific theory that may expand our knowledge base for future education. ---Judith Light Feather


Chris Pheonix, our Scientific Advisor for TNTG Inc., sent a few questions about the Unified Field Theory that Nassim Haramein addressed over the Holidays. Please download both the scientific and laymans papers and let us know if you have further questions. We wish you all a Happy New Year!

Dear Judith,

I wanted to start by thanking you very much for posting my paper on your site and bringing it to the attention of your community.

If I remember well, one of the comments was that the universe expansion from the big bang is what supplied the angular momentum and spin of all organized matter which is thought to be in a frictionless environment as in the standard model.

I suggest in this email a layman’s article that can be found on my site that describes why this assumption and generalization is grossly inadequate to describe the dynamics of angular motions from the galactic structures to the plasma dynamics of our sun or even the dynamo effect of our earth’s core.

In short, observation confirms dramatically that our universe is certainly not absent of friction or field interactions such as the plasma dynamics in solar layers or the magma surrounding our earth’s core or even the plasma viscosity of galactic arms. This is the very reason that geologists can not identify angular or magnetic moments for our earth.

The same problematic is found at the quantum level where electron clouds are thought to be in an ideal frictionless environment where electrons have been spinning at near the speed of light since the big bang. Basically, our current model has avoided doing appropriate accounting for the energy levels necessary both for the big bang and the obvious non-ideal environment in which both stellar objects and atomic particles live in.

The result of this omission has been the source of large discrepancies both in cosmological approximations where 96% of the mass is missing and at the quantum level where the vacuum fluctuations are in the range of 10^93g/cm^3.

An analogy would be to analyze the energy dynamics of the wheel of a car traveling from point A to point B all the while not accounting for the energy levels generated by the torque applied from the V8 engine in the car. Generalizations and largely idealized systems of that magnitude can play severe tricks on the evolution of a science such as physics and throw an evolutionary path into a division in concept and understanding of creation.

Our approach is to show that the spacetime manifold is not only responsible for the gravitational component but as well for spin/angular momentum of all organized matter, electron and subatomic particles. We believe that the benefit of such an approach yields not only a unified view of the forces of nature, which are directly linked to angular dynamics, but as well that it yields a more complete understanding of the feedback process and information loop between the electromagnetic field and the spacetime torque gravitational component (a black hole with hair).

Anyway, sorry I couldn’t reply earlier. I’m looking forward to further communications.


Nassim Haramein
Director of Research
The Resonance Project Foundation



The Announcement:

The Resonance Project Foundation, Hawaii, www.theresonanceproject.org is very pleased to announce the much anticipated publication of Nassim Haramein and E. A. Rauscher's paper, "The Origin of Spin: A Consideration of Torque and Coriolis Forces in Einstein's Field Equations and Grand Unification Theory" in the peer-reviewed Noetic Journal. This groundbreaking paper proposes a solution to the long-sought quest for a Unified Field Theory, which may revolutionize our understanding of physics as we know it.

Haramein and Rauscher’s paper constitutes a foundational description of the source of angular momentum/spin at all scales (from macro systems to micro subatomic particle structures) rendering a unified view of gravitation to the other forces such as electromagnetism, strong and weak force.

It does so by using the dual torus U4 bubble spacetime manifold, resulting from the inclusion of torque and Coriolis forces in Einstein’s gravitational equations.

The theory then relates the dual torus spacetime manifold to the subatomic group theoretical geometry of the cubeoctahedron (i.e. vector equilibrium), completing the picture at the quantum level.

Both of these geometric structures and concepts are long-standing and fundamental components of Haramein’s research.

Nassim Haramein and E.A. Rauscher's paper, "The Origin of Spin: A Consideration of Torque and Coriolis Forces in Einstein's Field Equations and Grand Unification Theory" is being published in the July 2005 Noetic Journal CD Rom, followed by the printed book version, ISSN# 1528-3739.

You can download the layman article, written by Haramein, in which the concepts put forth in this paper are described in a less technical manner, along with the pre-print paper.

I have included the last paragraph of the technical paper as a summation statement by Nassim Haramein, which will serve a an Abstract of the conclusions:

"We have developed an extended form of Einstein’s field equations in which we include torque and Coriolis forces, and hence torsion effects. New solutions are found to the extended field equations, which generates a modification of the Kerr-Newman solution we term the Haramein-Rauscher solution. We establish a reference frame in the description of the rotating metric that accommodates the complexities of gyroscopic dynamics – torque and Coriolis forces. This approach may allow us to define the origin of spin in terms of the new torque term in the field equations and better describe the formation and structure of galaxies, supernovas, and other astrophysical systems, their plasma dynamics and electromagnetic field. We formulate a relationship between gravitational forces with torsional effects and the Grand Unification Theory (GUT). This unification is formulated in terms of the metric of the new form of Einstein’s field equations which is a U4 space and the group theoretical basis of the GUT picture. Hence, gravitational forces with spin-like terms may be related to the strong and electroweak forces, comprising a new unification of the four forces." Nassim Haramein, E.A. Rauscher 2005

American Physical Society (APS) Meetings
Four Corners Fall October 24-25, 2003 Meeting ID: 4CF03 Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

A Consideration of Torsion and Coriolis Effects in Einstein's Field Equations http://www.aps.org/meet/4CF03/baps/abs/S150016.html

The Quest for the Higgs Boson and the Planck Black Hole Production at the CERN Large Hadron Collider http://www.aps.org/meet/4CF03/baps/abs/S130002.html

April Meeting 2002: Jointly Sponsored with the High Energy Astrophysics Division (HEAD) of the American Astronomical Society April 20 - 23, 2002 ; Albuquerque Convention Center ; Albuquerque , New Mexico

Fundamental Dynamics of Black Hole Physics

The Role of the Vacuum Structure on a Revised Bootstrap Model of the GUT Scheme http://www.aps.org/meet/APR02/baps/abs/S3600006.html

Joint Fall Meeting of the Texas Sections of the APS and AAPT, and Zone 13 of the SPS October 4 - 6, 2001; Texas Christian University ; Fort Worth , Texas

A Scaling Law for Organized Matter in The Universe http://flux.aps.org/meetings/YR01/TSF01/abs/S30006.html


~"“True observation begins when devoid of set patterns, and freedom of expression occurs when one is beyond systems.”"~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heres another article, includes some explainations about how infinity can
be explained. Shocked

The Geometry of Space
Posted: November, 2000
by Nassim Haramein

Have you ever wondered what this reality is made of? This atomic structure that is palpable, that seems so real? How is it that from nothingness everything emerges? Atoms are made of 99.99999% space so it turns out that what we call reality is mostly space with a little bit of a jiggle. A little vibratory fluctuation or, as described in quantum theory, a waveform generating what we call atomic structure. One must wonder, couldn't this fluctuation be a function of the space itself? Could space actually be full instead of empty? Couldn't atomic structures be only the symptom of the fluctuation of space?

This is nothing new; most ancient civilizations believed in an all-prevailing soup of energy embedded within the fabric of space, and later many of the world's great thinkers, including such scientists as Albert Einstein, Nicolas Tesla, Buckminster Fuller and Walter Russell, believed in an all-prevailing energy at the base of the fabric of space. The premise of this research is simple; space is not empty, it is full! It is full of an energy that creates atomic structures themselves —reality. It is a sea of electromagnetic flux we call the zero point energy, which has been demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt, since its mechanical effects have now been measured in laboratories.

In simple terms, reality is not unlike the phase transition that water undergoes when its molecules change into ice. This thermodynamic effect is the result of a transfer of energy or information from one state to another. In this case water can be represented as space and ice as atomic structure. Now we can identify both sides of the equation--one being a wave form (water or liquid) and the other being geometric (solid) as it gets cooler.

This research identifies the geometric relationship between space and the phase experienced by matter as related to [or illustrated by] the water/ice example. The relationship is geometrically communicated as a fractal tetrahedral array circumscribed by a sphere where the vector lines of forces generated by the geometric array is atomic structure and the sphere is the waveform resulting from the fluctuation of space. The geometric relationship to the waveform is non-linear since it is fractal with spheres, from infinitely big to infinitely small, embedded within each other in all directions, thus creating the experience of reality.

For instance, you can imagine in mechanical terms, that the electron spins are embedded in the rotation of the earth, embedded in the rotation of our solar system, embedded in the galactic arm, embedded in our galactic disk, embedded in our cluster, embedded in our superclusters, embedded in our Universe which duplicates fractally to infinity thus, more accurately described as our Multiverse. The structure is described by the orbital's relationship to infinity from infinitely big to infinitely small.

Now, picture yourself as one of these boundaries between the infinitely large and the infinitely small. The transfer of information, or energy, going across the boundaries is reciprocal in both directions. For example, the energy dispensed during the day by your body in terms of thermodynamics is reciprocal to the information gathered by your senses feeding your consciousness. The vector directions are at a 180 phase from each other or, in other words, in opposite directions, whereby the energy dispensed by your body is from the boundary outside of yourself and the information gathering is from the boundary inside of yourself, i.e. Consciousness or self-awareness. The standing waveform generated by the opposite phases is the boundary we call reality. The information transfer across the boundary is a function of the 64 codons generating the amino acids of the double helix of the DNA structure. The combinations of codons that seem to be inactive (only 20 out of 64 codons generate the DNA amino acids) are interacting geometrically with the fractal dimensions of space to transfer the information across the boundary, resulting in what is popularly known as the Auric field.

To give you an idea of the amount of information transfer related to only the actual 20 codons, if you were to extend a DNA packet found at the center of a cell so it unraveled like a tight string and you were to hold end to end all of the strands that are found in one human body alone, it would take a jet plane traveling at 1,000 mph approximately 256 years to fly to the end of that DNA.

Now why is it that most human beings will often utter the statement that it is impossible to imagine infinity when their own existence is part of the infinite boundary generated by the fractal geometry of space? The reason is simple: The tendency is to attempt to visualize the Multiverse in the external, infinitely large vector direction where visualization is a function of consciousness, rather than from the boundary inward, whose vector is going towards the infinitely small. Auspiciously, most Masters that have walked this earth have tried to educate the public about the importance of turning our senses inward, which translates in many different cultures as either prayer or meditation. Expressed geometrically or mathematically as nonlinear fractal mathematics or expressed philosophically as levels of consciousness, the importance of taking the time to sit in contemplation becomes self-evident. As a result of this practice one can experience the true nature of their existence and their place in the infinity of the Multiverse.


~"“True observation begins when devoid of set patterns, and freedom of expression occurs when one is beyond systems.”"~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Thanks once again....I didn't realize I posted that here - it started back on the audio post so if for some reason you think it is better posted in another topic, please advise.

I am glad I took the time to post those questions before I looked at Mr. Haramein's site....I wanted to recall what I was thinking before I got lost over there. Needless to say, I got lost getting there and so have not had the pleasure of being lost there yet!

The GUT is the source?

Nassim Haramein wrote:
.......This approach may allow us to define the origin of spin in terms of the new torque term in the field equations and better describe the formation and structure of galaxies, supernovas, and other astrophysical systems, their plasma dynamics and electromagnetic field. We formulate a relationship between gravitational forces with torsional effects and the Grand Unification Theory (GUT). ........

I am making another attempted landing later this evening. Laughing

You've probably seen this before but for anyone who has not - I think it is a clever approach to understanding a topic such as infinity that is typically intimidating to most people (and so they avoid it entirely)... a way of looking at things that is not complicated but simplified.

Tenth Dimension wrote:
A Quick Tour of Ten Dimensions

Imagining the Ten Dimensions

We explore a way that the ten dimensions can be imagined, with each stacked one upon another.

Tenth Dimension Forum
[right]Hi, this is Rob Bryanton. As the author of the book this website is based on, I will be checking in from time to time to answer any questions or comments... but these forums have also been created to allow people to talk to each other, and I am looking forward to seeing where these discussions will take us. I will reserve the right to remove any posts which are completely off-topic, or which veer too far outside the bounds of good taste, but other than that I am happy to let the chips fall where they may. We are discussing a "new way of imagining" the higher dimensions which I present in the eleven minute animation, and in chapter one of the book. Although these ideas are proving to have interesting resonances and connections for a great many people from around the world, they should not be confused with the mainstream teachings of string theory: please be sure to have read the "Preamble" link from this site's home page Navigation menu. Thank you for visiting "Imagining the Tenth Dimension".
Rob Bryanton[/justify]
Back to top

Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 442
Location: Middle o' Mitten, Michigan Corp. division of United States of America Corp. division of Global Corp.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The dual torus vortex can be understood topologically and mechanically by the Möbius strip, the Sudanese Möbius Band and the Klein bottle.

Each has only one edge and only one side. Each show how the "halves" of vortexes consist of only one appearing "side" (though topologically an inside and outside). Each provides an endless "path" on a single edge or side while seemingly occupying 2 planes. Infinity is modeled... Each is described mathematically too.

Unlike a balloon, a fly can go from the outside to the inside without passing through the surface (so there isn't really an "outside" and "inside").

There is and there isn't... motion is wave contraction and expansion on all planes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 6408

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is also another variation on the 720 degrees of the dirac string.

And the mirror surface which is in everything.

The same principle just keeps showing up. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:19 am    Post subject: Mr. Fuller's Dymaxion Map Reply with quote

Mr. Fuller's Dymaxion World Map:

As the ball turns, the mysteries IN life OUT side:
Which way UP?
Which way NORTH?

What if this was folded OUT on the IN side?

perceive (~ IN ~ thru the ~ OUT ~) door?
Back to top

Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 442
Location: Middle o' Mitten, Michigan Corp. division of United States of America Corp. division of Global Corp.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, the same principle keeps showing up however, I feel that the Dirac String is flawed in its interpretation. The Dirac String implies that a force may exist while lacking a pairing force. Notice that I said pairing force and not opposing force. An example of a pairing force as I'm using the term, would be the presence of a magnetic field where an electrical field was, or just passed, or used to be. Explained further...

When we observe electrical current we find that a magnetic field exists perpendicular to the electrical current and is observed in a local area where the electrical current just passed. Not ahead of it, nor even with it, but behind it, as if filling a void. But I don't think of this as filling a void or anything like that, but instead as a returning wave seen as a "force". A paired wave force that is unrelated to an opposing force, such as resistance in a conductor, etc.

A pairing force is simultaneous although existing at a separate "point" (ignore my flawed "points" thinking please), so to speak. While an opposing force is simultaneous although existing at a same "point".

If we visualize the 720 degree path we must take to return to a beginning point (again, ignore my flawed "points" thinking please), around a Möbius strip, we can see how waves may "change direction" (in and out in appearance) while not abruptly or oppositely, as in a "reflection" process. This may explain why we "see" a mirror plane while waves actually flow fluidly, transforming energy, rather than reflecting or bouncing. Milo Wolfe tried to explain the seemingly sudden turning points of incoming and outgoing waves by this 720 degree process.

This is seen in water too, when small waves intersect one another the molecules spin/wrap around in a Möbius manner before moving in an opposite direction. It looks like a bounce or reflection though... but the water molecules never stop moving. It is a transformation of energy (motion) without loss factors. Nature thus conserves, the Möbius strip shows how.

Getting back to the Dirac String hypothesis... consider that a force may require a pair, or a twin, since singular entities in nature don't seem to exist. Would it not be logical that the four forces in nature (weak force, strong force, magnetic force, gravity force) are products of each other? By that I mean paired forces, coexisting and manifest through the same wave structure/process?

Clear your mind of opposing forces here because any of the four forces can be opposing or attracting forces... think only force. Don't we always find at least two forces where we observe one? Isn't one force simply pairing with another to provide motion and energy? If so, the Dirac String can explain no more than a small part of a force. If so, the Dirac cannot explain anything. It is mono-directional, incomplete, and I feel that infinity is similarly and wrongly explained in this way.

Infinity is the easier part to understand, not the hardest. I have problems with the Unified Field Theory though too. I don't agree with the concepts that are currently given, but I'm not prepared to argue much at this time. Its a hell of a lot of fun though... thanks for bringing it. Hope this thread stays lively and interesting. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 1337
Location: SpaceTimeVibration

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fintan wrote:
This is also another variation on the 720 degrees of the dirac string.

And the mirror surface which is in everything.

The same principle just keeps showing up. Wink

I have in my files a Navajo cosmology that sounds just like Nassim Haramein's explanation.


Sa’ah Naaghái Boy and Bik'eh Hózhó

The Great Symbol
To save the world and the people, First Man came up with a plan. Possibly this plan may have been in the scheme of things from the beginning. The two most beautiful and powerful of all inner forms arose from First Man's medicine bundle.
This pair was known as Sa’ah Naaghái Boy and Bik'eh Hózhó Girl (Wyman 1970: 126, footnote 111; Witherspoon 1977:17-40). This pair were to be the parents of Changing Woman, who was found as a baby on the top of Gobernador Knob (Wyman 1970: 139-143). According to First Man's plan, Changing Woman would save the world by first restoring the power of reproduction, and secondly by giving birth to the Twins who would slay the monsters.

Why does the metaphysically challenged modern physicist theorist often believe their thoughts are unique and original, and out of the box?
geesh the Navajo have been sitting on the same MODEL it appears, as other cultures have too?
The Kogi of South America...same MODEL.
Just the language of expression is always different.
But languages are based on SOUND.
If you want to slice and dice EAST vs. WEST.
SOUND is a great place to start.

i.e. The Sanskrit word AUM is an expression of sound that releases ALL THE VOWELS vs. the Hebrew language which is structured on CONSONANTS.
Vowels are 'invisible', but acknowledged.

We know the Sanskrit language has 34 consonants and 16 vowels, this potentially be viewed as relating to the 4x4 magic square of Jupiter which is associated to A. Durer and the number 34.

Another clue to why the numbers 34 + 16 = 50 is significant....and why LANGUAGE is a significant player in a future where SOUND makes a difference in how things manifest.

34 + 16 = 50 suggests to me that this equation can be played around with...

34 = 7
16 = 7
50 = 5

i.e. thus 7 + 7 = 5?

7 = 2 + 5
thus 25 + 25 = 50
OR 52 + 52 = 104 = 5

All of those 25 = 52 associations seem kinda wacko UNTIL I point out that MARKO RODIN calls 25 the cosmic blender.

And if you view the 25 blender as a MIRROR...and you step into it, along the in/out Z axis, its reverse image still appears as 25 but the way the energy flows have been noticeably REVERSED.

NOW compare the above PATTERN to the next image.
The familiar Greek Fret PATTERN found the world over....and it can be traced back to 23,000 BCE.

Swastika – 3691251 – the yin/yang and the evolution of the Greek KEY fret pattern
Idea http://kachina2012.wordpress.com/2010/07/21/swastika-yinyang-and-the-evolution-of-the-greek-key-fret-pattern/

1251 = ABHA the "Great Name of God" according to Marko Rodin.

FOLKS the ancient mind clearly worked differently.
THAT IS THE FIRST STEP in understanding the ancients.
WE CLEARLY NEED TO INCORPORATE SOME OF THE OLD with the NEW and the BORROWED, so why are the messiahs BLUE?

We need to let go of certain assumptions as we disconstruct our Western IGNORANCEs.

thanks for nothing SCIENCE....
thanks for nothing duh duh DARWIN, we have LOST valuable TIME.

And the tetragrammaton, an expression of G_D is visibly missing the vowels...in the tetra (4) expression YHVH, or JHVH, or YHWH, or JHWH

Science it appears wants to enter the arena of beliefs and become yet another religion.
SCIENCE also appears to do what RELIGION has done too.
NOT GIVE THE HEATHENS from whom they stole their ideas, THEIR DUE.

Sa’ah Naaghái Boy and Bik'eh Hózhó Girl represent the underlying bipolar symmetry of the universe. Sa'ah Naaghái is the inner form of Bik'eh Hózhó, which is the outer form of Sa'ah Naaghái. Sa'ah Naaghái is the static dimension of the universe, while Bik'eh Hózhó is the active dimension. Sa'ah Naaghái is the thought of the universe, while Bik'eh Hózhó is its speech or voice (Wyman 1970:398). Sa'ah Naaghái is male; Bik'eh Hózhó is female. The dynamic, fertile, and omnipotent union of these two dimensions of the universe is what produces hózhó (Witherspoon 1977:16-46).

Same ole'
same ole'
it appears we (mainstream social engineers) are finally coming around to a similar spot in our understanding?

Sorry but Nassim Haramein has NOT come a long way.
The above image, along with eastern theories that have always been in place (since the invention of 'jesus') that are NOT part of the mainstream west, suggests we are only trying to fine tune what has been known for a long time.
We are clearly coming around to an old way of thinking and seeing the world.

It is like the awakening human is leaving 'flatland' and climbing to a mountain top and looking down upon our former self.
And this is an apt analogy for having a Near Death Experience too.
An NDE is similar to leaving flatland existence OR perhaps a 3D life form coming to grips with his inner self, incorporating it all into a 4D geometry perspective.
Here is a GREAT GREAT GREAT SITE do yourself a favor
check this place out.
To learn about leaving 'flatland' using the platonic solids...this is a MUST MUST MUST SEE
....choose the Dimensions 2 episode
IF you do not click on this *link*, I gotta say you are an IGNORANT person ignoring a gift.....just saying.

Humanity is spiraling and we are coming AROUND to a former wisdom.

The last 2000 years suggests we have been approaching a turning point clueless about what exists around the corner.

I want to show you an image re: involution/evolution from a Tarot book, printing 1963, along with some accompanying text.
(I will need to scan it if I cannot find it on the net)

All I see in science today is an awakening...and they are struggling, like ALL past beliefs, in trying to express the universe in 'science/math' terms.

Reinventing the Wheel is what history appears to be, when patterns are observed over long periods of time.
Like sailing around the world, the journey is great, enjoy it, because eventually it ends, where you started?

Nothing brand new is being discovered, what appears to be more apparent is that the recovered info is constantly chipping away at the math constants, and the educated guesses, based on observing PATTERNS reveals in fact that science is slow at unveiling what our former intuition/instincts have hinted at, since time immemorial.

Sometimes I ponder if THEY are simply grooming the New Age SwiSS born NaSSim Haramein with his longish jeSuS kinda hair, as the heir apparent to the Einstein Myth.

Depending on where all this goes...
Could THEY be planning on using NaSSim as a VEIL, the way THEY did Einstein?


p.s. Idea

52 Godspell Gospel Writers required here:
Fintans name or NOM is already on the list.

KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> Understanding Our Reality All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.