|
| :: Previous topic :: Next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nat
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 840
Location: minime-rica
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:05 pm Post subject: |
  |
|
you seem very well informed about england's finest..got relatives here, huh ? 
just FYI, 'neopolitan' [icecream] is my favourite cliche englander insult (brown or orange face, white shoulders and red arms) 
i must protest ever so slightly in regard to the stupidity of the question, the question was in response to the testimony as published in the thread-starter article - the testimony strongly inferred that hiv/aids is contracted through receptive rear entry, which left a question mark over the (i guess) non receptive defendant's cause of infection
although i agree that does not exclude other possible causes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeroen
Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 60
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | i must protest ever so slightly in regard to the stupidity of the question, the question was in response to the testimony as published in the thread-starter article - the testimony strongly inferred that hiv/aids is contracted through receptive rear entry, which left a question mark over the (i guess) non receptive defendant's cause of infection |
First of all, the article doesn't say that Eleni's alleged statement is a testimony.
According to the orthodox theory, hiv (a virus) is contracted through (especially receptive anal) intercourse. Once contracted, hiv is said to cause aids. There is also a test that supposedly determines if you have been infected with hiv (ie are hiv+). Eleni argues that hiv has not been proven to exist, which obviously implies that hiv-tests are worthless and that there's no proof that hiv can be contracted and cause aids.
According to Eleni, receptive anal sex (RAS) may play a part in causing some aids defining diseases, say aids for the sake of argument. Schematically:
Orthodoxy: RAS => hiv+ => aids
Eleni: RAS => aids AND hiv does not exist
You have to clearly distinguish between hiv and aids.
The thread-starter article says:
| Quote: | | The future looked good -- until 1998, when [the defendant] had a blood test. He was told he carried the human immunodeficiency virus, commonly called HIV. |
So the defendant is hiv+ which, according to Eleni, is meaningless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nat
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 840
Location: minime-rica
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| right, gotcha...my thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
