Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 1:12 pm Post subject: Coronavirus - Don't Believe the Hype
Straight off, let's get the measure of this coronavirus.
Early reports were of twenty-six deaths out of 800 reported cases - a 3% mortality rate.
Currently there are 1450 cases and 41 deaths - still 3%.
But this is NOT the true mortality rate!
These numbers come from doctors and hospitals ONLY.
Many, many more people have been infected and have either no symptoms
or mild symptoms or flu symptoms not requiring medical assistance.
Flu has a true mortality rate under 1%.
Looks like this is about the same rate.
So why all the frikkin hype?!
We don't shut airports to stop the flu spreading.
Or lock down cities to stop head colds lol.
Pharma and the Chinese Central Committee
It's the Securico-Medical Industrial complex.
Everything's merging these days.
"We've got an infrastructure that requires discovery of new, threatening
epidemics. And the media pick a new one every year. In 2003 it's SARS.
For the past couple of years, it's been West Nile Virus. Next year it'll be something else."
Dr Dan Duffy Whale.to
DON'T BELIEVE THE HYPE
The 2003 Sars epidemic collapsed in
a pile of contradictions and clumsy science.
For the last ten days we have been telling you the World Health Organization(WHO) research team were getting it all wrong. Today, the Times of London is reporting that scientists: "have suffered a setback after finding that the [corona]virus blamed for the potentially fatal disease was not present in most patients taken ill."
MEME OR SYNDROME?
The SARS concept is a meme --a term coined by Professor Richard Dawkins. Memes are contagious information patterns which replicate by infecting human minds and altering their behavior, causing them to propagate the pattern.
Slogans, catch-phrases, and fashions are typical memes. In our instant electronic world, pernicious memes like SARS can spread faster than any disease pathogen. Right now, the SARS meme is has gripped health authorities and the public.
It's effects are out of all proportion to proven health dangers. It is now time for responsible journalism. And as we argued over a week ago, it's time for prudent, well researched and balanced pronouncements about SARS by health authorities......
TORONTO, 2003 by Fintan Dunne - A leading WHO expert has admitted that coronavirus may not be the cause of SARS after all.
"I think everyone is under huge pressure to get stuff out, and the journals are bugging people for papers," said Frank Plummer, director of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg. "And some people are slapping things together. I remain to be convinced."
Canada's SARS epidemic is over. Or maybe not. It all depends on which version of WHO pronouncements on SARS you care to rely upon.
Either way, Dr. Frank Plummer just told the Health Canada SARS summit in Toronto that in recent days his microbiology lab had found no corona virus at all in tested samples from suspect and probable SARS cases.
GOING, GOING, GONE!
Over the weeks of testing, the percentage of Canadian SARS cases with the corona virus had declined from 80% to 60%, to 50%, to 40%, to 30% and then to zero. That could be because many people have been misclassified as SARS patients, or there is a problem with taking the samples, or the virus has "gone away," the lab director said.
And just to confuse matters, before the virus disappeared altogether, the tests found the coronavirus strain in 14% of people who were neither suspect nor probable SARS cases.
So some people have had SARS symptoms but no corona virus. Others have corona virus but no symptoms. Go figure!
Previously, Dr. Plummer indicated that a third group which had no contact with SARS affected areas -surprisingly had the virus. And all the while we are working according to the WHO definitive statement that corona virus is unquestionably the cause of SARS.
How does Dr. Plummer feel about all this? "It is a concern," he said yesterday in comments. "It's puzzling," he said last week.
It's worse than that, it's a sick joke. You won't believe this. While corona virus has disappeared in Canada but they still have SARS, in India, SARS has just disappeared but they still have corona virus.
INDIA IS SARS FREE
Last week, India was coping with its first SARS cases, when up to nine people tested positive for corona virus. The BBC described the subsequent haphazard responses to the crisis as farcical.
The Associated Press reported that the number of SARS cases had doubled to 19 when nine staff members of a hospital that treated an infected family came down with the flu-like disease and another man tested positive after visiting Singapore. India was reeling. But that was two days ago. A long time in SARS geo-politics.
Because yesterday the World Health Organisation and the Indian Central Government declared that India had no SARS cases, as not a single person in the country fitted the case definition formulated by the WHO.
The Union Health Minister, Sushma Swaraj, and the WHO's representative in India, S.J. Habayeb, said that a person could be a SARS case if all the three conditions were met: should have a fever more than 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit, should have difficulty breathing or other respiratory problem, and should either have traveled to a SARS-affected country or should have been in contact with a known SARS patient.
In India, only one person in Goa had satisfied all the three conditions and he had been discharged from hospital. As a result, the WHO has removed India from the list of countries reporting SARS cases, they said.
The Asian Age reports the situation more revealingly: "All the Indian cases which tested positive in the laboratory tests do not have symptoms befitting SARS clinical definition. As diagnostic kits are not foolproof, lab tests are supportive with symptoms being the key deciding factors, WHO said."
Are you are getting the implications of all that? Forget the tests, the WHO are saying. Only the symptoms matter. Fine. So let's see how the SARS situation is developing in the USA.
Yesterday, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revised the interim surveillance case definition for SARS. The criteria have been updated to include laboratory test results for evidence of infection with corona virus.
CDC Director Julie Gerberding told a Senate committee yesterday that the CDC will send SARS test kits to state health departments by the end of this week. The same type of tests which form the basis of crime scene forensic science and paternity suits. These are the tests which the WHO has determined are useless in terms of the Indian SARS situation.
THE WHO CIRCUS FOLDS ITS TENTS
In Canada, they have no virus but they have SARS. In India they have virus but no SARS. In the USA they don't truly know whether they have SARS unless they know if they have virus.
And, um... some people in Canada have the virus but no SARS. Others have SARS but no virus. More have no symptoms, but have virus. And as 8,000 pneumonia deaths annually attest, yet more have SARS-like symptoms --but they just have old-fashioned pneumonia.
Many cases of pneumonia were atypical long before the supposed SARS came along. Ask any doctor. That's why the term exists in medicine. So what's new? Corona virus, supposedly.
In an article for the BBC yesterday, headlined "Sars circus comes to Toronto," BBC science correspondent, Richard Black explained that diseases aren't conveniently measurable.
"They're messy and difficult, " he wrote.
Which explains why the World Health Organisation is dumping the prudent "can't be too careful with a new killer pandemic" approach, as it rescinds the Toronto travel advisory, and abandons the Indian nation to the tender mercies of what may be SARS --or may not be.
The WHO is getting out of the SARS business.
Corona virus was the glue which held SARS together. The glue is coming apart. The WHO is backpedalling fast, before everybody realizes SARS is not a valid disease classification. As we have been saying from the start.
The WHO spends two thirds of it's budget on administration. That pays for a lot of expense accounts. Time to get back to essentials.
It's called damage limitation.
Saint Francis of Toronto
Saving us all from WHO knows what.
"What I can conclude is that we have a new corona
virus epidemic that's highly associated with SARS....
whether it's the entire cause of SARS or part
of the story ... I'm not sure," - Dr. Frank Plummer
HATS OFF TIME FOR
by Jon Rappoport - April 28 2003
There are reporters, and then there are reporters. Fintan Dunne is the real thing. He takes apart medical issues in a way that truly pleases the soul.
Fintan's latest site is www.SarsTravel.com and you should run, not walk, to get to it.
He is now on the case, every day, ripping up SARS lies and exposing the truth. What more can you want?
The travel industry should be knocking at his door, because he can save their professional lives.
Toronto and Canada in general should be flying him in, first class, with all the perks, because he has the info that can turn around the SARS fiasco in a few days.
In a sane world, he would have collected a few heavy journalistic prizes by now. But in a sane world, he would be doing other things.
Yeah, he is posting some of my articles on SARS, so you could say we have a little mutual admiration society going here. But way beyond that, this guy knows the score, and he has no fear.
For years, he has been calling the numbers right every time on deep medical issues, and he doesn't wobble.
Man who pushed SARS dud
now pushing new Chinese virus
January 24, 2020 by Jon Rappoport
First, a few updates. Things are moving fast.
The Chinese government has locked down Wuhan, a city of 11 million people, owing to the “threat of the coronavirus.” There are also travel restrictions in several other Chinese cities. What does all this prove?
It proves the Chinese government wants to install tighter controls. It doesn’t lead to the conclusion that a coronavirus is making people sick or killing them.
During the so-called Zika Virus crisis of 2016, women in several countries were told not to get pregnant, because the virus might cause brain damage in their babies. That was a form of lockdown, too. If it were instituted for good reason, we would now be seeing massive numbers of babies all over the world born with microcephaly (smaller heads and brain damage), as the virus spreads. We aren’t seeing that. I covered the Zika story extensively, and proved it was a scientific fraud. A dud.
The measures government authorities enact do not constitute proof of a harmful virus. Otherwise, presidents and kings could write science all day long simply by issuing orders.
We are now seeing photos of “people lying in the street” in Wuhan, and perhaps other Chinese cities, so-called victims of the coronavirus. What does this prove?
So far, I’ve seen pictures of four or five people lying in the street or on a hospital floor. In a city of 11 million people. If this, all by itself, were proof that a new coronavirus is a killer, then Los Angeles and New York—with their homeless street populations—would have no people left.
The text of a patent for a coronavirus is circulating wide and far on the Web. What does this prove?
Patents for many viruses are obtained all the time. More specifically, these patents discuss ways of weakening viruses or extracting material from them for the purposes of developing vaccines. I’ve read excerpts from two different coronavirus patents, one in the US and one in the UK. They both refer to vaccine development. They aren’t, as some people assume, slam-dunk evidence that researchers are cooking up a virus in a lab or weaponizing it.
Well, here is a comforting development. The Chinese researcher, Zhong Nanshan, who “discovered the SARS virus” in 2003, is now at the forefront of pronouncements about the “new coronavirus” that is shaking up China and other parts of the world.
His mere presence on the scene is a warning sign: take a grain of salt, try a pound.
Zhong Nanshan’s 2003 SARS “pandemic” was a dud. A WHO (World Health Organization) advisory against traveling to “infected” Toronto cost merchants in the city several billion dollars. Meanwhile, a Canadian WHO biologist, Frank Plummer, told the press he was shocked by the fact that fewer and fewer SARS patients had the virus in their bodies. Actually, “fewer and fewer,” he said, was approaching ZERO. Hoax. THE PURPORTED CAUSE OF THE DISEASE WASN’T THERE. People had ordinary flu symptoms.
What do you do when this sort of embarrassment occurs? Do you confess the whole business was a mistake or a con or a hustle? Do you own up to the fact that, when people are said to be suffering from ordinary flu symptoms, and you’re calling it a new disease with a new cause, you’re wrong and you’re very, very, very sorry? Do you point out that people who don’t have the cause of a new disease in their bodies don’t have the new disease?
Of course not. You just move ahead and pray no one notices.
When you claim the grand death total from the SARS “epidemic,” worldwide, is 800 out of seven billion, and you can’t even prove those 800 died from the “SARS virus,” do you, the World Health Organization, admit your whole program of epidemic detection is a fraud? Do you pay Toronto several billion dollars for their troubles?
Of course not. You keep calling SARS an epidemic forever. You write fake histories. You do whatever is necessary to maintain your phony reputation.
And when a new possible-maybe-could-be virus surfaces in China, now, you bring the same researcher who “discovered SARS” out of mothballs, and you put him front and center.
Here’s the capper. Read carefully. The World Health Organization claims that, every year, there are between three and five million cases of ordinary run-of-the-mill flu in the world, resulting in 290,000 to 650,000 deaths. The symptoms are indistinguishable from SARS. But for some reason, they don’t declare ordinary flu an ongoing epidemic. No, they choose SARS, for which the cause is absent—and they call THAT an epidemic. It caused 800 deaths, versus 290,000-650,000 deaths.
Does this make any kind of sense? Actually, it does, if they want to: increase control over the population; condition them to expect and pray for a (watch-out TOXIC) vaccine to save them; shoot up pharmaceutical profits; scare the pants off people; induce them to willingly accept greater surveillance wherever they go; step up police and military presence; enact quarantines; hypnotize populations with the idea that they’re lifelong patients under the supervision of the medical cartel; teach “safety and security” above freedom.
Just realize how right and good and true THE AUTHORITIES are, get down on your knees and thank your lucky stars they’re here protecting the health of everyone on the planet. They’re the Church of Biological Mysticism, and they want you as a devoted member.
Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Posts: 154 Location: Perth, Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:28 pm Post subject:
Luckily for us Bill Gates was on to it before it happened.
October 18, 2019, collaborating with the World Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation hosted “Event 201” where they ran a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic.
Where would be be without them?
In a far far better place, that's where.
KEY PLAYERS IN THE CORONAVIRUS DUMMY RUN:
Hasti Taghi is the Executive Advisor to the Chairman of Advertising & Partnerships at NBCUniversal.
Adrian Thomas serves as, Vice President Global Public Health, at Johnson & Johnson.
Eduardo Martinez is President of the UPS Foundation
RADM Stephen C. Redd is the Deputy Director for Public Health Service and Implementation Science at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Professor George F. Gao is the Director-General, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Gao obtained his DPhil degree from Oxford University, UK, and did his postdoc work in both Oxford University and Harvard University, with a brief stay in Calgary University.
Avril Haines is a Senior Research Scholar at Columbia University; and a principal at WestExec Advisors. During the last administration, Dr. Haines served as Assistant to the President and Principal Deputy National Security Advisor. She also served as the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and Legal Adviser to the National Security Council.
Dr. Chris Elias is President of the Global Development Program, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Here's the mission statement from the
corporate and intelligence people behind
that coronavirus preparedness exercise.
Public-private cooperation for
pandemic preparedness and response
A call to action
The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering. Efforts to prevent such consequences or respond to them as they unfold will require unprecedented levels of collaboration between governments, international organizations, and the private sector. There have been important efforts to engage the private sector in epidemic and outbreak preparedness at the national or regional level.1,2 However, there are major unmet global vulnerabilities and international system challenges posed by pandemics that will require new robust forms of public-private cooperation to address.
The Event 201 pandemic exercise, conducted on October 18, 2019, vividly demonstrated a number of these important gaps in pandemic preparedness as well as some of the elements of the solutions between the public and private sectors that will be needed to fill them. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose the following:
Governments, international organizations, and businesses should plan now for how essential corporate capabilities will be utilized during a large-scale pandemic. During a severe pandemic, public sector efforts to control the outbreak are likely to become overwhelmed. But industry assets, if swiftly and appropriately deployed, could help to save lives and reduce economic losses. For instance, companies with operations focused on logistics, social media, or distribution systems will be needed to enable governments’ emergency response, risk communications, and medical countermeasure distribution efforts during a pandemic. This includes working together to ensure that strategic commodities are available and accessible for public health response. Contingency planning for a potential operational partnership between government and business will be complex, with many legal and organizational details to be addressed.
Governments should work now to identify the most critical areas of need and reach out to industry players with the goal of finalizing agreements in advance of the next large pandemic. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board would be well positioned to help monitor and contribute to the efforts that governments, international organizations and businesses should take for pandemic preparedness and response.
Industry, national governments, and international organizations should work together to enhance internationally held stockpiles of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to enable rapid and equitable distribution during a severe pandemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently has an influenza vaccine virtual stockpile, with contracts in place with pharmaceutical companies that have agreed to supply vaccines should WHO request them. As one possible approach, this virtual stockpile model could be expanded to augment WHO’s ability to distribute vaccines and therapeutics to countries in the greatest need during a severe pandemic. This should also include any available experimental vaccine stockpiles for any WHO R&D Blueprint pathogens to deploy in a clinical trial during outbreaks in collaboration with CEPI, GAVI, and WHO. Other approaches could involve regional stockpiles or bi- or multinational agreements. During a catastrophic outbreak, countries may be reluctant to part with scarce medical resources. A robust international stockpile could therefore help to ensure that low and middle resource settings receive needed supplies regardless of whether they produce such supplies domestically. Countries with national supplies or domestic manufacturing capabilities should commit to donating some supply/product to this virtual stockpile. Countries should support this effort through the provision of additional funding.
Countries, international organizations, and global transportation companies should work together to maintain travel and trade during severe pandemics. Travel and trade are essential to the global economy as well as to national and even local economies, and they should be maintained even in the face of a pandemic. Improved decision-making, coordination, and communications between the public and private sectors, relating to risk, travel advisories, import/export restrictions, and border measures will be needed. The fear and uncertainty experienced during past outbreaks, even those limited to a national or regional level, have sometimes led to unjustified border measures, the closure of customer-facing businesses, import bans, and the cancellation of airline flights and international shipping. A particularly fast-moving and lethal pandemic could therefore result in political decisions to slow or stop movement of people and goods, potentially harming economies already vulnerable in the face of an outbreak. Ministries of Health and other government agencies should work together now with international airlines and global shipping companies to develop realistic response scenarios and start a contingency planning process with the goal of mitigating economic damage by maintaining key travel and trade routes during a large-scale pandemic. Supporting continued trade and travel in such an extreme circumstance may require the provision of enhanced disease control measures and personal protective equipment for transportation workers, government subsidies to support critical trade routes, and potentially liability protection in certain cases. International organizations including WHO, the International Air Transport Association, and the International Civil Aviation Organization should be partners in these preparedness and response efforts.
Governments should provide more resources and support for the development and surge manufacturing of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics that will be needed during a severe pandemic. In the event of a severe pandemic, countries may need population-level supplies of safe and effective medical countermeasures, including vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. Therefore, the ability to rapidly develop, manufacture, distribute, and dispense large quantities of MCMs will be needed to contain and control a global outbreak. Countries with enough resources should greatly increase this capability. In coordination with WHO, CEPI, GAVI, and other relevant multilateral and domestic mechanisms, investments should be made in new technologies and industrial approaches, that will allow concomitant distributed manufacturing. This will require addressing legal and regulatory barriers among other issues.
Global business should recognize the economic burden of pandemics and fight for stronger preparedness. In addition to investing more in preparing their own companies and industries, business leaders and their shareholders should actively engage with governments and advocate for increased resources for pandemic preparedness. Globally, there has been a lack of attention and investment in preparing for high-impact pandemics, and business is largely not involved in existing efforts. To a significant extent this is due to a lack of awareness of the business risks posed by a pandemic. Tools should be built that help large private sector companies visualize business risks posed by infectious disease and pathways to mitigate risk through public-private cooperation to strengthen preparedness. A severe pandemic would greatly interfere with workforce health, business operations, and the movement of goods and services.3 A catastrophic-level outbreak can also have profound and long-lasting effects on entire industries, the economy, and societies in which business operates. While governments and public health authorities serve as the first line of defense against fast-moving outbreaks, their efforts are chronically under-funded and lack sustained support. Global business leaders should play a far more dynamic role as advocates with a stake in stronger pandemic preparedness.
.....The International Health Regulations prioritize both minimizing public health risks and avoiding unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade. But there will also be a need to identify critical nodes of the banking system and global and national economies that are too essential to fail – there are some that are likely to need emergency international financial support as well. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, regional development banks, national governments, foundations, and others should explore ways to increase the amount and availability of funds in a pandemic and ensure that they can be flexibly used where needed.
Governments and the private sector should assign a greater priority to developing methods to combat mis- and disinformation prior to the next pandemic response. Governments will need to partner with traditional and social media companies to research and develop nimble approaches to countering misinformation. This will require developing the ability to flood media with fast, accurate, and consistent information. Public health authorities should work with private employers and trusted community leaders such as faith leaders, to promulgate factual information to employees and citizens. Trusted, influential private-sector employers should create the capacity to readily and reliably augment public messaging, manage rumors and misinformation, and amplify credible information to support emergency public communications.
National public health agencies should work in close collaboration with WHO to create the capability to rapidly develop and release consistent health messages. For their part, media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including though the use of technology.
Accomplishing the above goals will require collaboration among governments, international organizations and global business. If these recommendations are robustly pursued, major progress can be made to diminish the potential impact and consequences of pandemics. We call on leaders in global business, international organizations, and national governments to launch an ambitious effort to work together to build a world better prepared for a severe pandemic.
You decide where lies the line
between good analysis and paranoia.
Here's Rappoport again, reminding us that only 1 in 6 cases of flu..... are flu!!
The China “epidemic”: lying about viruses
by Jon Rappoport January 29, 2020
In my ongoing series of articles (archive here), I’ve already established at least a dozen reasons for rejecting the coronavirus story. In particular, demanding that we believe the coronavirus is responsible for an epidemic is absurd.
In this article, I’m going to cover another angle.
In contemporary history, the officials most guilty of spreading disinformation about epidemics work for major public health agencies—two, in particular. The World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). For the moment, let’s focus on the CDC.
The Agency has quite a track record of lying about viruses. Therefore, trusting them to say anything about an epidemic caused by a virus now would be on the order of driving a car out on the road when you know it has no brakes.
Here is an astonishingly egregious example of what I mean. The CDC pushes the flu vaccine as if the continued existence of planet Earth depends on it. Their conventional idea is: the flu virus must be prevented from causing disease; our best protection is the flu vaccine; it prepares the body to defeat that virus when it comes along for real.
This highly debatable point of view presupposes, of course, that the flu is, in fact, caused by the flu virus. Well, sure. Obviously.
But suppose something is very wrong and twisted about that supposition?
Enter Peter Doshi, PhD. He asks: how many people diagnosed with the flu really have the flu?
Writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), he reveals a monstrosity:
Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don’t have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.
The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.
The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here’s the exact quote from Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
“…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.
“…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu (84 percent) aren’t the flu.
So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.
When you boil it down, the CDC is lying about viruses. They’re saying the flu virus is THERE, in the bodies of people who are diagnosed with the flu, when for the overwhelming percentage of such people, the flu virus ISN’T there.
So why would you believe them now, when they talk about the Chinese coronavirus as the cause of a so-called epidemic?
In order to push vaccines, they’ll say and do anything.
Even a used car salesman, operating out of a lot that looks like a hurricane blew through it, sells you some kind of broken down car. At the CDC, they’re selling viruses that aren’t there at all.
Whitney Webb has a blaster article
which ties in one place a lot of
threads emerging in recent days:
The Pentagon’s main biodefense lab has ties to the virology institute in Wuhan, China where the current outbreak is believed to have begun. This has been unreported in English language media. The Pentagon began spending millions on bat to human coronavirus research in 2018 at known U.S. military bioweapons labs bordering China and resulted in the discovery of dozens of new coronavirus strains as recently as last April.
Irrefutable: The coronavirus was engineered by scientists in a lab using well documented genetic engineering vectors that leave behind a “fingerprint”
Every virology lab in the world that has run a genomic analysis of the coronavirus now knows that the coronavirus was engineered by human scientists. The proof is in the virus itself: The tools for genetic insertion are still present as remnants in the genetic code. Since these unique gene sequences don’t occur by random chance, they’re proof that this virus was engineered by scientists in a lab.
if you put vast numbers of Chinese citizens into mandatory seclusion they will inevitably be forced to look at the state of their lives and have time to question things that usual everyday activity precludes; that will have huge implications for the future of China.
The destructive power of the usury banking satanists is truly terrifying. They control the entire globe (governments/media/pharma/transport), except for those few countries who resist and as a result are under military attack now.
The estimates are that 500 million euros will be lost in Barcelona and many people will be VERY angry.
Maybe this will result in hundreds of millions, or much more, in lawsuits at which point the truth of this global $cam will come out.
Two of the biggest satanist-controlled operations (Deutsche Bank and Amazon) decide that the entire conference must be cancelled so all others must fall in line?!!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum