FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
The Bush/G8 New World Order
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps Audios
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
Rumpl4skn



Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 2950
Location: 36� 3'N x 86�40'W

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:37 am    Post subject: Re: Spinning the Dick-tater. Reply with quote

Jerry Fletcher wrote:
Speaking of nauseating...

Dictatorship or 'Family Feud?'.
What's next? Richard Dawson as State Secretary?

What I'm interested in is who 41 is gonna get to play 44.

It gets worse, Jerry. Now Dubya is "chiding" Poppy.

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-10-22T193206Z_01_N22305445_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-FATHER.xml&src=rss&rpc=22
Quote:
Bush chides father for election remarks
Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:32pm ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush gently admonished his father for saying he hates to think what life would be like for his son if the Democrats win control of Congress in the November 7 election.

It was the latest sign of possible strain in the relationship between the two men.

"He shouldn't be speculating like this, because -- he should have called me ahead of time and I'd tell him they're not going to (win)," a smiling Bush told ABC "This Week" in an interview broadcast on Sunday.

It follows the recent release of a book, "State of Denial," by journalist Bob Woodward, that says the 82-year-old former president was "anguished" over how the Iraq war has played out, although he has dismissed that account.

In response, Woodward has consented to change the title of his book to "United States of Denial."

_________________
"No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Rumpl4skn



Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 2950
Location: 36� 3'N x 86�40'W

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

David Gergen dropped a small smoke bomb today on Chris Matthews' Hardball.

James Baker da Turd has been "fending off" suggestions that he become the next Defense Secretary. A scenario that's likely once Rumsfeld is done hurting the GOP next week by refusing to resign.
------------------------------------------------------
So, a political science student dies and goes to Heaven. His guide is showing him around, and he's fascinated by what he sees.
"Wow, look at all the dead U.S. Presidents. There's George Washington, and Abe Lincoln. There's Thomas Jefferson, and John F. Kennedy. And there's George H W Bush."

"Hey, wait a minute," he says. "Poppy Bush isn't dead. What's he doing here?"

And his guide says, "Aw, that's not Poppy Bush. That's God. He just thinks he's Poppy Bush."

_________________
"No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 7731

PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:


http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1586481886/ref=sib_dp_pop_fc?ie=UTF8&p=S001#reader-link


Quote:
REVIEWS

Yeehaw!, July 12, 2004 By A Customer

Very well done! This book shines the spotlight on perhaps the largest, most influential power cabal in the country, and possibly the world. If you were ever curious about why so many Texas based corporations loom so large within the sphere of US government, particularly from the 1930's to the present, this book will provide you with the answers. The literal melding of private defense related corporations into the government has produced a cash bonanza that has created billionaires who now get to determine the most critical aspects of US government policy. The author examines the rise of companies like Halliburton and Brown & Root, as well as the numerous oil companies, law firms, and political crony networks that provide the cash and clout to maintain the Texas based plutocracy which holds significant control over the rest of the country. Among other things, Bryce explores connections between the crony network and the Savings & Loan scandal, oil politics of the Middle East, both Presidents Bush, President Johnson, various congressional legislators, Enron, James Baker, Dick Cheney, and the usual cast of big oilmen. This book is for anyone who wants to know who holds the real power in this country, and how it got that way. This one should come with a bright red label that says "READ BEFORE THE ELECTION!"

March of the Mercantilists, September 6, 2004 By Andrew S. Rogers

At first, I feared this book would be the 2004 winner of the Michael Lind Prize for Progressive Texans Dissing Texas. But "Cronies" didn't turn out like Lind's comically tendentious "Made In Texas: George W. Bush And The Southern Takeover Of American Politics (New America Books)" at all. Instead, Robert Bryce has assembled a pile of puzzle pieces in a way that not only makes a lot of sense, but that forms a picture the American electorate needs to see. As much as it pains me to agree with Molly Ivins about anything at all, this is excellent investigative reporting.

Bryce has gone back into the history of the Texas awl bidness and shown how, from the beginning, key players in that industry have cultivated their connections with politicians to increase their own wealth and power. Many Texas politicians, from LBJ and Sam Rayburn to Jim Wright, Tom DeLay, and a whole mess of Bushes, have been more than happy to be so cultivated, since it tends to result in floods of cash into their re-election campaigns, foundations, and presidential libraries. Though Bryce is far from the only writer shining a spotlight on Halliburton and Brown & Root these days, his work is among the best charting the complex web of ties between politics, the military, big business, and foreign policy. Combine all this incestuous intermingling with the international entanglements described in Chalmers Johnson's "The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic (The American Empire Project)," and you come up with an especially unsavory look at America's 50-plus year run of hand-over-first mercantilism.

My use of the term "mercantilism" is deliberate, because one complaint I do have about this book -- as I did with Michael Mann's "Incoherent Empire" -- is the author's apparent assumption that what he's describing is "capitalism." Toward the end of the book, he mentions, apparently without irony, "laissez-faire Texas Republicans" like DeLay and President Bush, even though he's just spent the previous 270 pages showing that their economic philosophy is anything *but* "leave us alone." The conscious crafting of government policy that deliberately promotes the interests of a certain sector of the economy has a name, and it ain't capitalism. It's "mercantilism." A little more precision here would have gone a long way in categorizing the true nature of everything he otherwise ties together so well.

As Lind's and other books show, Texas is a sweet target these days. I'm not convinced that the oil business is necessarily unique in the kinds of power and influence it has managed to acquire in government (for example, I recommend Linda Chavez's new "Betrayal: How Union Bosses Shake Down Their Members and Corrupt American Politics" to show how liberal Democrats have been bought and paid for by Big Labor -- and Bryce should enjoy a use of Scare Caps almost as copious as his own). But even pro-Bush, pro-business Republicans ought to take a good look at the vines that have been growing up around our republic and ask whether this is really the kind of thing the Founders had in mind.

Link

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 7731

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
For 50 years the USGovt has been a hidden nazi enclave
of wicked fascists who have hidden behind their overt disdain
for communism, with Kissinger the flag bearer, with Brzezinski
the ideologue [and] Papa Bush the executor
.


--Jim Willie | 4 April 2014 "Emerging Dynamics of Petro-Yuan Standard"


The above by Jim Willie, in the last few days, he is on board
with core aspects of the 9/11 DejaVu analysis.

Quote:

http://911dejavu.com/


Bush 1 is the boy who is hungriest of all. He is the enforcer.
The enabler. The one who siezes the reins of the State.
The lynchpin around which it resolves.
10 Oct 2006 http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8292#8292





He's also on board with the gold-based trade
settlement ideas in the Birth of New Money series.

Can't say I buy his dollar 'huge collapse' senario.
And I don't buy the idea HAARP caused Fukushima.

But his: hidden Nazi enclave run by Poppy Bush as executor.

Yeah - right on! Exclamation

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 7731

PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bob Parry is the AP journalist who got his teeth
into the Iran Contra story and wouldn't let go -
even when the elite leaned on him.

Here's a recent article of his - published the last day of 2014.

It illuminates the Reagan-era cabal at work.

Ties nicely into this BFN thread's examination of
the scope of the Bush'es hidden US dictatorship.

Quote:

President Reagan meets with publisher Rupert Murdoch, U.S. Information Agency Director Charles Wick,
lawyers Roy Cohn and Thomas Bolan in the Oval Office on Jan. 18, 1983.


Murdoch, Scaife and CIA Propaganda

December 31, 2014

Special Report: The rapid expansion of Americas right-wing media began in the 1980s as the Reagan administration coordinated foreign policy initiatives with conservative media executives, including Rupert Murdoch, and then cleared away regulatory hurdles, reports Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry

The Reagan administration pulled right-wing media executives Rupert Murdoch and Richard Mellon Scaife into a CIA-organized perception management operation which aimed Cold War-style propaganda at the American people in the 1980s, according to declassified U.S. government records.

Although some records relating to Murdoch remain classified, several documents that have been released indicate that he and billionaire Scaife were considered sources of financial and other support for President Ronald Reagans hard-line Central American policies, including the CIAs covert war in Nicaragua.

A driving force behind creation of Reagans extraordinary propaganda bureaucracy was CIA Director William Casey who dispatched one of the CIAs top covert action specialists, Walter Raymond Jr., to the National Security Council to oversee the project. According to the documents, Murdoch was brought into the operation in 1983 when he was still an Australian citizen and his media empire was much smaller than it is today.

Charles Wick, director of the U.S. Information Agency, arranged at least two face-to-face meetings between Murdoch and Reagan, the first on Jan. 18, 1983, when the administration was lining up private financing for its propaganda campaign, according to records at the Reagan presidential library in Simi Valley, California. That meeting also included lawyer and political operative Roy Cohn and his law partner Thomas Bolan.

The Oval Office meeting between Reagan and Murdoch came just five days after NSC Advisor William Clark noted in a Jan. 13, 1983 memo to Reagan the need for non-governmental money to advance the project. We will develop a scenario for obtaining private funding, Clark wrote, as cited in an unpublished draft chapter of the congressional Iran-Contra investigation.

Clark then told the President that Charlie Wick has offered to take the lead. We may have to call on you to meet with a group of potential donors.

The documents suggest that Murdoch was soon viewed as a source for that funding. In an Aug. 9, 1983 memo summing up the results of a Casey-organized meeting with five leading ad executives regarding how to sell Reagans aggressive policies in Central America, Raymond referred to Murdoch as if he already were helping out.

In a memo to Clark, entitled Private Sector Support for Central American Program, Raymond criticized a more traditional White House outreach program headed by Faith Whittlesey as preaching to the converted.

Raymond told Clark that the new project would involve a more comprehensive approach aimed at persuading a majority of Americans to back Reagans Central American policies, which included support for right-wing regimes in Guatemala and El Salvador as well as the Contra rebels fighting the leftist Sandinista government of Nicaragua.

We must move out into the middle sector of the American public and draw them into the support column, Raymond wrote. A second package of proposals deal with means to market the issue, largely considering steps utilizing public relations specialists or similar professionals to help transmit the message.

To improve the projects chances for success, Raymond wrote, we recommended funding via Freedom House or some other structure that has credibility in the political center. Wick, via Murdoch, may be able to draw down added funds for this effort.

Raymond included similar information in a separate memo to Wick in which Raymond noted that via Murdock [sic] may be able to draw down added funds to support the initiative. (Raymond later told me that he was referring to Rupert Murdoch.)

In a March 7, 1984 memo about the Private Funders Project, Raymond referred to Murdoch again in discussing a request for money from longtime CIA-connected journalist Brian Crozier, who was looking for private sector funding to work on the question of anti-Americanism overseas.

Raymond wrote: I am pursuaded [sic] it is a significant long term problem. It is also the kind of thing that Ruppert [sic] and Jimmy might respond positively to. Please look over the stack [of papers from Crozier] and lets [sic] discuss if and when there might be further discussion with our friends.

Crozier, who died in 2012, had a long history of operating in the shadowy world of CIA propaganda. He was director of Forum World Features, which was set up in 1966 by the Congress for Cultural Freedom, which received covert funding from the CIA. Crozier also acknowledged in his memoir keeping some of his best stories for the CIA.

At least one other document related to Murdochs work with USIA Director Wick remains classified, according to the National Archives. Murdochs News Corp. has not responded to requests for comment about the Reagan-era documents.

Helping Murdoch

Murdoch, who became a naturalized citizen of the United States in 1985 to meet a regulatory requirement that U.S. TV stations must be owned by Americans, benefited from his close ties to both U.S. and British officialdom.

On Monday, the UKs Independent reported that Ed Richards, the retiring head of the British media regulatory agency Ofcom, accused British government representatives of showing favoritism to Murdochs companies.

Richards said he was surprised by the informality, closeness and frequency of contact between executives and ministers during the failed bid by Murdochs News Corp. for the satellite network BSkyB in 2011. The deal was abandoned when it was discovered that journalists at Murdochs News of the World tabloid had hacked the phone of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler and others.

What surprised everyone about it not just me was quite how close it was and the informality of it, Richards said, confirming what had been widely reported regarding Murdochs access to powerful British politicians dating back at least to the reign of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. The Reagan documents suggest that Murdoch built similarly close ties to leading U.S. politicians in the same era.

In 1983, Murdochs rising media empire was still based in Australia with only a few U.S. properties, such as the Star tabloid and the New York Post. But he was eyeing expansion into the U.S. media market. In 1984, he bought a stake in 20th Century Fox and then six Metromedia television stations, which would form the nucleus of Fox Broadcasting Company, which was founded on Oct. 9, 1986.

At the time, Murdoch and other media moguls were lobbying for a relaxation of regulations from the Federal Communications Commission, a goal that Reagan shared. Under FCC Chairman Mark Fowler, the Reagan administration undertook a number of steps favorable to Murdochs interests, including increasing the number of TV stations that any single entity could own from seven in 1981 to 12 in 1985.

In 1987, the Fairness Doctrine, which required political balance in broadcasting, was eliminated, which enabled Murdoch to pioneer a more aggressive conservatism on his TV network. In the mid-1990s, Murdoch expanded his political reach by founding the neoconservative Weekly Standard in 1995 and Fox News on cable in 1996. At Fox News, Murdoch has hired scores of prominent politicians, mostly Republicans, putting them on his payroll as commentators.

Last decade, Murdoch continued to expand his reach into U.S. mass media, acquiring DirecTV and the financial news giant Dow Jones, including The Wall Street Journal, Americas leading business news journal.

Scaifes Role

Richard Mellon Scaife exercised his media influence on behalf of Reagan and the conservative cause in a different way. While the scion of the Mellon banking, oil and aluminum fortune did publish a right-wing newspaper in Pittsburgh, the Tribune Review, Scaife mostly served as a financial benefactor for right-wing journalists and think tanks.

Indeed, Scaife was one of the original financiers of what emerged as a right-wing counter-establishment in media and academia, a longstanding goal of key Republicans, including President Richard Nixon who recognized the importance of propaganda as a political weapon.

According to Nixons chief of staff H.R. Haldeman, as reported in The Haldeman Diaries, one of Nixons pet ideas was to build a network of loyal conservatives in positions of influence. The President was pushing again on project of building our establishment in press, business, education, etc., Haldeman wrote in one entry on Sept. 12, 1970.

Financed by rich conservative foundations and wealthy special interests, Nixons brainchild helped tilt politics in favor of the American Right with Richard Mellon Scaife one of the projects big-money godfathers. By using family foundations, such as Sarah Scaife and Carthage, Scaife joined with other leading right-wing foundations to fund think tanks, such as the Heritage Foundation, which Scaife helped launch in 1973.

In 1978, Nixons friend and Treasury Secretary William Simon provided more impetus to this growing machine, declaring in his book, Time for Truth: Funds generated by business must rush by the multimillion to the aid of liberty to funnel desperately needed funds to scholars, social scientists, writers and journalists who understand the relationship between political and economic liberty.

With Reagans inauguration in 1981 and Caseys selection as CIA director Scaife and other right-wing ideologues were in position to merge their private funding with U.S. Government money in pursuit of the administrations geopolitical goals, including making sure the American people would not break ranks as many did over the Vietnam War.

Building the Operation

On Nov. 4, 1982, Raymond, after his transfer from CIA to the NSC staff but while still a CIA officer, wrote to NSC Advisor Clark about the Democracy Initiative and Information Programs, stating that Bill Casey asked me to pass on the following thought concerning your meeting with Dick Scaife, Dave Abshire [then a member of the Presidents Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board], and Co.

Casey had lunch with them today and discussed the need to get moving in the general area of supporting our friends around the world. By this definition he is including both building democracy and helping invigorate international media programs. The DCI [Casey] is also concerned about strengthening public information organizations in the United States such as Freedom House.

A critical piece of the puzzle is a serious effort to raise private funds to generate momentum. Caseys talk with Scaife and Co. suggests they would be very willing to cooperate. Suggest that you note White House interest in private support for the Democracy initiative.

In subsequent years, Freedom House emerged as a leading critic of Nicaraguas Sandinista government, which Reagan and Casey were seeking to overthrow by covertly supporting the Contra rebels. Freedom House also became a major recipient of money from the U.S.-funded National Endowment for Democracy, which was founded in 1983 under the umbrella of the Casey-Raymond project.

The role of the CIA in these initiatives was concealed but never far from the surface. A Dec. 2, 1982 note addressed to Bud, a reference to senior NSC official Robert Bud McFarlane, described a request from Raymond for a brief meeting. When he [Raymond] returned from Langley [CIA headquarters], he had a proposed draft letter re $100 M democ[racy] proj[ect], the note said.

While Casey pulled the strings on this project, the CIA director instructed White House officials to hide the CIAs role. Obviously we here [at CIA] should not get out front in the development of such an organization, nor should we appear to be a sponsor or advocate, Casey said in one undated letter to then-White House counselor Edwin Meese III as Casey urged creation of a National Endowment.

On Jan. 21, 1983, Raymond updated Clark about the project, which also was reaching out to representatives from other conservative foundations, including Les Lenkowsky of Smith-Richardson, Michael Joyce of Olin and Dan McMichael of Mellon-Scaife. This is designed to develop a broader group of people who will support parallel initiatives consistent with Administration needs and desires, Raymond wrote.

Bashing Teresa Heinz

One example of how Scaifes newspaper directly helped the Reagan administration can be seen in clippings from the Tribune-Review that I found in Raymonds files. On April 21, 1983, the newspaper published a package of stories suggesting illicit left-wing connections among groups opposed to nuclear war.

The articles leave little doubt that Scaifes newspaper is suggesting that these anti-war activists are communists or communist fellow travelers. One headline reads: Reds Woo Some U.S. Peace Leaders.

Another article cites an accusation from one congressman in the 1950s, after hearings on foundation grants to numerous Communists and Communist-front organizations, that Here lies the story of how Communism and Socialism are financed in the U.S. where they get their money. The 1983 article then asks: Is history repeating itself?

Ironically, one of the philanthropists who is singled out in these red-baiting articles is Teresa Heinz, then married to Sen. John Heinz, R-Pennsylvania, who died in a 1991 plane crash. In 1995, Teresa Heinz married Sen. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, who is currently Secretary of State.

The organizational role of Casey and Raymond in this domestic propaganda campaign raised concerns about the legality of having two senior CIA officials participating in a scheme to manage the perceptions of the American people.

Both in internal documents and a deposition to the congressional Iran-Contra committee, Raymond made clear his discomfort about the possible legal violation from his and Caseys roles. Raymond formally resigned from the CIA in April 1983, so, he said, there would be no question whatsoever of any contamination of this.

That sensitivity was also reflected in press guidance prepared in case a reporter noted Raymonds CIA background and the problems it presented to the public diplomacy effort. If someone challenged press reports that asserted there is no CIA involvement in the Public Diplomacy Program and then asked isnt Walt Raymond, a CIA employee, involved heavily? the prescribed answer was:

Walter Raymond is a member of the National Security Council staff. In the past he has worked for Defense, CIA and State. It is true that in the formative stages of the effort, Walt Raymond contributed many useful ideas. It is ironic that he was one of those who was most insistent that there be no CIA involvement in this program in any way.

Indeed, it is a credit to the Agency that it has stressed throughout that the United States ought to be completely open about the programs it puts in place to assist in the development of democratic institutions and that none of these programs should come under the aegis of the CIA. They do not want to be involved in managing these programs and will not be. We have nothing to hide here.

If a reporter pressed regarding where Raymond last worked, the response was to be: He retired from CIA. He is a permanent member of the National Security Council. And, if pressed about Raymonds duties, the scripted answer was: His duties there are classified. (Raymonds last job at the CIA was Director of the Covert Action Staff with a specialty in propaganda and disinformation.)

Beyond how Raymonds classified duties contradict the assertion that we have nothing to hide here, there was a more deceptive element of the press guidance: it didnt mention the key role of CIA Director Casey in both organizing and directing the project and it suggested that Raymonds role had been limited to offering many useful ideas when he was the hands-on, day-to-day manager of the operation.





Caseys Hidden Hand

Caseys secret role in the propaganda scheme continued well into 1986, as Raymond continued to send progress reports to his old boss, even as Raymond fretted in one memo about the need to get [Casey] out of the loop.

The public diplomacy operation was the kind of thing which [Casey] had a broad catholic interest in, Raymond shrugged during his Iran-Contra deposition. He then offered the excuse that Casey undertook this apparently illegal interference in domestic politics not so much in his CIA hat, but in his adviser to the president hat.

Though the Casey-Raymond teamwork ended with the exposure of the Iran-Contra scandal in late 1986 and with Caseys death on May 6, 1987, its legacy continued with Scaife and other rich right-wingers funding ideological media that protected the flanks of President Reagan, his successor President George H.W. Bush and other Republicans of that era.

For instance, Scaife helped fund the work of Steven Emerson, who played a key role in discrediting investigations into whether Reagans 1980 campaign had sabotaged President Jimmy Carters hostage negotiations with Iran to gain an edge in that pivotal election. [See Consortiumnews.coms Unmasking October Surprise Debunker.]

Scaife also helped finance the so-called Arkansas Project that pushed hyped and bogus scandals to damage the presidency of Bill Clinton. [See Consortiumnews.coms Starr-gate: Cracks on the Right.]

Walter Raymond Jr. died on April 16, 2003. Richard Mellon Scaife died on July 4, 2014. But Rupert Murdoch, now 83, remains one of the most powerful media figures on earth, continuing to wield unparalleled influence through his control of Fox News and his vast media empire that stretches around the globe.


Investigative reporter Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s.

You can buy his latest book, Americas Stolen Narrative, either in print here or as an e-book (from Amazon and barnesandnoble.com).

You also can order Robert Parrys trilogy on the Bush Family and its connections to various right-wing operatives for only $34. The trilogy includes Americas Stolen Narrative. For details on this offer, click here..

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fintan
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 7731

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THE BUSH BOYZ
ARE BACK IN TOWN?

DAMMIT - THEY NEVER LEFT!


Quote:

_________________
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rumpl4skn



Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 2950
Location: 36� 3'N x 86�40'W

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, those are all the associated names I want to hear: Poppy Bush, Dubya, Wolfowitz and Netanyahu.

I believe that if we actually elect a third member of this horrifically Satanic family, there should be a global campaign to have this place declared unusable for any political purposes, and shut down.

_________________
"No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Big Boss



Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 822
Location: Outer Heaven

PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fintan you should report your older article of the same title for context for any new readers, boy are you on the money lol....frustrating when they pull the "...are back" meme when these slick operators know damned well they've been around for decades...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps Audios All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.