|
| :: Previous topic :: Next topic |
| Author |
Message |
atm

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 3578
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bri

Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2887 Location: Capacious Creek
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Webster Tarpley eh?
Beats AJ or Wayne Madsen or something...I guess...
Skipping around...Jonathan Kay seems like kind of a snide asshole,
pandering to the CT audience ("I'm open-minded!", "conspiracies exist")
while at the same time making fun of them and calling them irrational.
He's semi-correct though, check out about 1hr 18 minutes,
the emotional knee-jerk reactions
and extremist reactions have certainly destroyed the
image of 9/11 truth....but that was the POINT damnit,
of course Tarpley will never admit that, his whole career
depends on Loose Change and AJ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bri

Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2887 Location: Capacious Creek
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
p.s. I'm so happy that BFN exists so that at least we can
get some of these ideas on record! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
atm

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 3578
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bri
Jones and Tarpley no longer get on too well, as Tarpley vociferously asserts on his radio show that Ron and Rand Paul are frauds.
I've also noticed a certain Irish journalist using Tarpley as a touchstone.
I admit that I have not watched the whole webinar yet, so I'll reserve judgement until I have synthesized it, over at least two viewings.
I just put it out there for the sake of it.
atm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bri

Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2887 Location: Capacious Creek
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| atm wrote: | Bri
I just put it out there for the sake of it.
atm |
No worries atm, I knew that,
never judge, how we do here on BFN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IronClad
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 435 Location: Kent
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 9/11 movement will never get anywhere unless they think positive.
For instance, we have this:-
http://shoestring911.blogspot.co.uk/2009/05/f-16s-that-failed-to-protect-washington.html
DID NAVY CONTROLLERS SEND THE JETS THE WRONG WAY?
After being delayed during takeoff, things got significantly worse for the Langley jets. Major Kevin Nasypany, the NEADS mission crew commander, had ordered them to fly north, toward the Baltimore area. [21] But at around 9:34 a.m., William Huckabone noticed that instead they were going east over the ocean, toward a military training airspace called Whiskey 386. [22] As a result, when the Pentagon was hit at 9:37 a.m., the Langley fighters were about 150 miles from there--further away from the Pentagon than they had been when they took off. [23]
The Fleet Area Control and Surveillance Facility in Virginia Beach, Virginia, is the Navy air traffic control agency that handles all over-water military operations.
And this:-
Yet the Navy controller who answered their call sounded indifferent, as if he were oblivious to the seriousness of the situation.
What is the positive side of this?
Certainly, what little has been reported about the actions of this facility appears quite bizarre and suspicious.
There isn't one.
What is positive is that the SOF was put up to make 3 jets. The negative is that command was lost on the ground. Hard to believe, right.
What is positive is Whiskey 386.
Tarpley favourite are these umpteen military exercises but you don't here much of Whiskey 386.
Jets did not go into the City because that was the target area. 3 jets went up to search and destroy from where the attack was coming from.
The negative angle is always put across in these panel debates. Get the sides at logger heads and all sense is lost and the real searching questions are always lost in the hot air.
SOF commanders are not sent out under false pretensions. Curious and suspicious, yes but not a conspiracy theory. It was fact. Be more positive with facts otherwise we will be here another 10 years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IronClad
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 435 Location: Kent
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Boss

Joined: 04 May 2008 Posts: 768 Location: Outer Heaven
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talk about birds of a feather (from the above artivle posted by IronClad):
| Quote: | | Mark Zaid, a national-security attorney who regularly represents intelligence officers in legal actions against the U.S. intelligence community,... |
I remember that name lol... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|