| :: Previous topic :: Next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rom

Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 417
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have not viewed the link yet.
The ones responsible for JFK murder. Martin Luther King murder, Bob Kennedy murder, 911, 7/7, Polish goverment murder, Dr Kelly murder ... you name it ... are the same people. Next horrendous murders will be by the same people!
Victor Ostrovsky believed he was working for "Israel", he was working for these people, and he got sick of it. Killing German politicians, or training the Tamil Tigers was not "Israeli interests". _________________ We can learn "a lot" from Jesuit controlled media
- The best way to stay healthy is to avoid natural food
- Personal liberty is a threat to our freedom
- Only permanent war will give us peace
- Only controlled media are free media
please copy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IronClad
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 435 Location: Kent
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/video/lawful-bank
Fintan, will this work for us?
It only seems far-fetched and radical because it cuts out usury and the banking system which is part of the establishment. But set up a new banking concept and chains [an ideal moment when interest rates are low] just like setting up any business.
It shouldn't go unnoticed that Muslim societies are against usury and couldn't this be one reason why a "war is waged" against them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leon
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1046 Location: 3d-rate nation
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Iron, cut the crap, just give me a text of your Constitution please....I submit there is NONE since Britain is still under fucked up medieval control of Venetians half-freaks. Your claims to democracy are outright ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew
Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| IronClad wrote: | http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/video/lawful-bank
Fintan, will this work for us?
It only seems far-fetched and radical because it cuts out usury and the banking system which is part of the establishment. But set up a new banking concept and chains [an ideal moment when interest rates are low] just like setting up any business.
It shouldn't go unnoticed that Muslim societies are against usury and couldn't this be one reason why a "war is waged" against them? |
Here is a more recent video of the so-called Lawful bank. (1.5 hours long)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dljoLArlFXo
And a debate including Ireland on TNS Seeking Solutions Radio forums; a mostly Irish site as far as i know.
http://tnsradio.ning.com/forum/topics/mpe-in-one-day-at-most-how-to-master-understand-mpe (a short thread.)
As said in previous posts the so called Lawful bank has it's problems, but the so-called MPE (Mathematically perfected Economy) is ridiculous when thought through. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rom

Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 417
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leon
"I submit there is NONE since Britain is still under fucked up medieval control of Venetians half-freak ..."
SO "THE BRITISH" ARE NOT BRITISH THEN?
If the "The British" are "Venetians" then they are NOT British.
Leon, don't run away from a simple clarification of what you are saying. _________________ We can learn "a lot" from Jesuit controlled media
- The best way to stay healthy is to avoid natural food
- Personal liberty is a threat to our freedom
- Only permanent war will give us peace
- Only controlled media are free media
please copy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leon
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1046 Location: 3d-rate nation
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
British are British, English are English, Khazars 'are a people' and Rom is dead horse-beater.
Show me the British Constitution. Without one Britain is just another medieval monarchy like Saudi Arabia were people live and die at the pleasure of the Queen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IronClad
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 435 Location: Kent
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leon, I did not argue it was one document as in the case of the US Constitution. Here is a helpful site to show the interaction of the whole thing.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/british_constitution.htm
Of course it all kicks off with this:-
http://www.bl.uk/treasures/magnacarta/translation/mc_trans.html
Interesting that it was intended to limit the kings power for raising taxes from the barons and that the Jews power of collecting interest had to be restricted to prevent the underaged next of kin from paying it.
It seems to have progressed from there to the stage of the monarch signing off on everything so anything left from medival times is next to nothing. The "barons" have taken over.
It now seems left to the Monach to read the feeling of her subjects before giving Assent or up to the subjects themselves and even they curtail to their government. Is she going to sign off on the effective abolishion of the Bill of Rights. Because that will be effectively abolishing the monacy. We will become subjects of the European Union.
It is also interesting that an Act that was altered to get through a land tax [again directed at the "barons"] has effectively made it possible for the majority party to put through their bills but now we find ourselves in a coalition government.
So it seems medival legislation was mostly to limit power and distribute rights more evenly and now it is in the hands of the "barons" - the barons of industry. Who is around now to limit the power of the government. It is in the hands of the people. God help us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew
Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
.
Which is a problem with the so-called British Constitution Group, they keep making excuses for the Monarchy (who have married into the Khazar Ashkenazi, banking families many years ago; William Shakespeare (even if those plays were composite works of different authors) explains this when read between the lines.
--------
Many years ago 100/200 years ago in America people had “Allodial title” It describes a situation where real property (land, buildings and fixtures) is owned free and clear of any dues payable to a superior landlord or worldly king etc.
This is why in America (A mans home was his castle) with the same prerogative rights as the king, rather than just subjects to a worldly king, superior, landlord etc and how well they did the bidding of a plutocracy (Idolatry) (where no good deed goes unpunished and no bad deed goes unrewarded)
“I nowhere see the federal power,-- for all men in America,-- are self governing.” " I can go into the remotest parts of Kentucky and if I see nothing else upon the mantelpiece, I will always see a copy of the collective works of William Shakespeare and the KJV Bible, and all Americans are fluent in both." I.E understood more of the real and fair Law and the scams that were going on.
Alexis de Tocqueville (tipping his hat on the scam of democracy and the text within) in De la démocratie en Amérique (published in two volumes, the first in 1835 and the second in 1840) is a classic French text by Alexis de Tocqueville.
Last edited by Andrew on Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:30 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rom

Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 417
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leon
"I submit there is NONE since Britain is still under fucked up medieval control of Venetians half-freak ..."
Leon
"British are British,"
You are contradicting yourself.
If The Britisk are running US and Italians are running the The British, then it is not The British who are running US, but the Italians (= the Jesuits). The Jesuits are "Italians" only by name, their blood is Khazarian, they are the ones who are running most scams in the world. _________________ We can learn "a lot" from Jesuit controlled media
- The best way to stay healthy is to avoid natural food
- Personal liberty is a threat to our freedom
- Only permanent war will give us peace
- Only controlled media are free media
please copy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew
Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | If The Britisk are running US and Italians are running the The British, then it is not The British who are running US, but the Italians (= the Jesuits). The Jesuits are "Italians" only by name, their blood is Khazarian, they are the ones who are running most scams in the world.
|
To true and its not even hidden, even wiki has detail of the "Rat Lines" "project paper clip" Jesuit Ashkenazi rat lines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leon
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1046 Location: 3d-rate nation
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| IronClad wrote: | Leon, I did not argue it was one document as in the case of the US Constitution. Here is a helpful site to show the interaction of the whole thing.
|
From sources you quoted:
"Amendments to Britain’s unwritten constitution are made the same way – by a simply majority support in both Houses of Parliament to be followed by the Royal Assent."
Is it a bad joke? Unwritten Constitution? Simple majority? Royal Assent?
Where is enumeration of unalienable rights? Where are restrictions (at least in theory) on the collusion of power between corrupt politicians and the Crown? Where is judiciary clamping down on bad laws due to their unconstitutionality?
No wonder British and their Fifth Column on Wall Street are the main enemy of the US Constitution and doing everything in their power to render it irrelevant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IronClad
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 435 Location: Kent
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leon
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1046 Location: 3d-rate nation
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I got to say that British Constitution is as much non-existent as it is unwritten and British System of Government is more alien to American than one of Afghanistan or Russia. So how come Brits are always following Americans around in their military adventures, and who is following who exactly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew
Joined: 08 Mar 2012 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | No wonder British and their Fifth Column on Wall Street are the main enemy of the US Constitution and doing everything in their power to render it irrelevant. |
Leon, so the so-called British wrote the US Constitution and is why it has many flaws in it. One famous founding so-called father said "I smell a rat" The Bill Of Rights tried to correct some of it, which it did but not far enough.
On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approved the Constitution for the united States of America, and the States became the Constitutors. What is the legal definition of the term, "constitutor"? A Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed.) The States were now liable for the United States debt owed to the King of England, but the people of America were not yet liable, because they were not a party to the Constitution since it was never put to them for a vote. On August 4, 1790 an Act was passed that, for all intents and purposes abolished the States and created Federal Districts. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. Then the states reorganized their governments, which had to be done because the States needed to "legally" (under men's laws) transfer the bonded obligation for debt repayment from the states to the people. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote, so the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to the people for a vote, thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. Once again, deception is used to get the people to unknowingly volunteer into bondage.
Last edited by Andrew on Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leon
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1046 Location: 3d-rate nation
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You bet your ass, Andrew. I smell a rat too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|