FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Nukelies: nuclear weapons hoax, nuclear power probable hoax
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
Rerevisionist



Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apologies - my message seemed to be too long and would not load. There's no 'delete' option - PLEASE READ ON & IGNORE THIS

Last edited by Rerevisionist on Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:07 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rerevisionist



Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apologies - my message seemed to be too long and would not load. There's no 'delete' option - PLEASE READ ON & IGNORE THIS

Last edited by Rerevisionist on Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:07 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rerevisionist



Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apologies - my message seemed to be too long and would not load. There's no 'delete' option - PLEASE READ ON & IGNORE THIS

Last edited by Rerevisionist on Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:08 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rerevisionist



Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apologies - my message seemed to be too long and would not load. There's no 'delete' option - PLEASE READ ON & IGNORE THIS

Last edited by Rerevisionist on Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:08 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rerevisionist



Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hawkwind,

[1] You ask for the 'best evidence to support my conjecture'. There are many issues; you don't make it clear which 'conjecture' you mean. Your best bet may be to click this link which is a guide to the site - it explains the material in logical sequence, and you can pick which bits of the forum to look at.
http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=118


[1A] Another part of the forum looks at the Manhattan Project, the supposed atom bombings of Hiroshima & Nagasaki, subsequent claims about 'H bombs', material on Cuba, the atom spies, and so on. I've supplied evidence for how and why the myths seem to have been made up--
http://nukelies.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=4


[2] As it turns out, the Manhattan project and funding was largely Jewish run - Oppenheimer, Sachs, &c. The atom spies were Jewish - in our view false flag stuff, so Jews in the USSR could pretend to have atomic secrets. The point of this was probably to deter Americans from attacking the USSR. It's just that the evidence points that way.

[3] Nuclear power is a bit more difficult - it might be possible to generate enormous heat, but not use it as a bomb. The intense secrecy and lack of checks and balances make the material rather circumstantial. However, this thread discusses nuclear power, and you might pay attention to the 'dumpload' idea--
http://nukelies.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=9
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
leon



Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 1046
Location: 3d-rate nation

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting… Seems like Rerevisionist is running typical “Poison the Well” COINTELPRO operation. I suggest we (actual humans that is who frequent this board) just ignore any post coming from “it”. Let it wither on the wine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rom



Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 417

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, this becomes more like making "truth" be something that can be marketed like any other product. Write enought about something and that becomes "research" = "scientific source". Then make links to something people have no time to read. Most written on the net is wrong, created in the head of the writer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rerevisionist



Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's quite amusing to see obvious trolls doing their usual stuff. They might at least try to address the issues.
__________
Apologies for the previous unremovable postings - the delete option doesn't work & it took me time to work out why my post wasn't showing. In case anyone's in doubt, the 'nuke' material is entirely serious. Nukes are a fraud.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rom



Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 417

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a problem about promoting something that will be easy ridicule in media, undermining the credibility of alternative media. The "truth" here is of minor importance compared to the election. Those who would like any kind of diversion now is mainstream. My impression of forums is that they produce a lot of cheap words. Just my 2-cents thoughts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rerevisionist



Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It won't be ridiculed. Because that would draw attention to it.
www.nukelies.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
IronClad



Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Posts: 435
Location: Kent

PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would seem a strange thing to test nuclear weapons as would be the case with conventional non-nuclear weapons if you were going to contaminate the earth or the air or whatever they do for years to come.

If a weapon is more lethal than is required why test the damn thing?

A confined and miniture laboratory test would test the concept. Why upgrade to a larger test when the concept is known.

May be Nagasaki and Hiroshima are in the same class as the mooning landing. Why before its time - before the technology and before the fall out could ever be dreamed of.

May be there are folk who test out these things just for the bang and not without knowing the consequences.

Let's see what happens to Nagasaki and when that was not definite on the findings they chose another test on Hiroshima. If these were kosher than surely why have the later nuclear tests?

The more tests there were the less likely they were nuclear weapons because the more tests the more contamination.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leon



Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 1046
Location: 3d-rate nation

PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iron, have you heard the concept of "critical mass"? You just can't have a "miniature" U-238 or Plutonium bomb. What the hell do they teach you in school in physics class?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.