JFK assassination film hoax? Any chance?

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

[quote=7forever;3900570]I found a gape in the nix film but it comes a little after front right impact.[/quote]

The rear gape doesn't show up after impact.

The gape shows up here and very likely the following frame from above.

During the alteration of Zapruder they compressed the impact and the rear skull gape in one frame and did their best to hide skull detaching in between subsequent frames.
312, no gape.

313, complete rear gape.

This guy here did some work on the rear exit and he confirms my work that puts the rear exit in between frames 312-313, only one frame and says in nix it was was two frames which is consistent with the nix captures.
[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BX1UPmELGNc"]YouTube - JFK Back of Head- Part III - Visibility of Hind Scalp Tear[/url]

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

[quote=porsteamboy;3907324] You can't have a gaping hole without something being ejected![/quote]

Connally described being sprayed with a clear liquid which is something more logical than some fake red blotch. It's also not likely that fluid would show up in these old films but the back of his head popping off would, especially if t opens up just the way it does in Zapruder. These are in sequential order with the first being just before 313, showing the perfect gape up close. Jfk's skull did what it logically had to do with the right rear exit wound he suffered. The back of his head was blown off just like forty witnesses saw with their own eyes, including Clint Hill, Jackie, and Jfk's killer, Bill Greer.

Between 313-314

THE WHOLE REAR POPS OFF AFTER IMPACT.

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

You can see the alteration close up the hole real quick and it shows itself again in the frames around 335.

Frame 337 shows Jackie's freak out when she sees the hole.

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

The old copies of Zapruder always show incriminating evidence of the rear exit and film alteration more clearly.
Frame 312 shows no fake red mist and his head intact. Frame 313 shows the rear gape clearly in this copy without any confusion. The eye can easily distinguish the top and bottom skull and the hole in between.

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

The gaping exit and skull detaching appears between 312-313, 313-314, and 316-317. They did their best to hide the hole but slow motion exposes it and the attempts to hide that hole.

In between 316-317 a ghost-like image shows the white lane through jfk's head. That hole closes up by 317.

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

The old copies of Zapruder always show incriminating evidence of the rear exit and film alteration more clearly.
Frame 312 shows no fake red mist and his head intact. Frame 313 shows the rear gape clearly in this copy. The eye can easily distinguish the top and bottom skull and the hole in between.

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

Dr. Humes described the mess at the top as dislodged scalp. He also down played the entrance over the right eye as a contusion. Some theorists said jfk went somewhere in between Parkland and Bethesda. If so, some type of debridement may have taken place to cover the wound. This area is still visible and metal fragments were recovered behind the right eye and showed up in x-rays.

The right rear is clearly missing here and many witnesses saw jfk the way he lies here. He didn't have to be on his stomach because the hole was on the right rear. Notice the small flap on the right side compared to that fake mess in Zapruder.

A better view of rear gape and compare the dislodged scalp. It's similar.

[/b]

Peter · Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 10:32 am Post subject: turning on one of their own

A couple of my favorite "little known" sites for JFK analysis are:

http://www.patspeer.com/

20 chapters of in-depth, rigorous analysis of x-ray and other data. There is a one hour summary video on Youtube as well.

http://www.youtube.com/user/bobharris77

Complete appraisal of the evidence, including an adequate refutation of the Bill Greer saga.

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DguBcLpWBS0&feature=related
I knew a long time ago, bobharris77 had realized during the making of this clip that Zapruder had in fact been altered to hide the fact that Greer shot Kennedy. He did make some adjustments to it because you can no longer advance it with your mouse from 158-200-202. At two minutes you could see the red smoke and then advance to 202 and see the red blotch appear, both of those happening in unison with the white extending backward.

At around 1:30 he's babbling on about how the driver's left hand is at his side while holding steady at frame 312. At the end of his verbal nonsense he advances to frame 313 where you can clearly see it extend in sync with the headshot. What he did was create this effect which distracts the viewer from seeing the fake white working in sync with the fake red blotch. He did this because the screen didn't change for 30 or more seconds before advancing it to 313. This amount of time would have revealed to at least some viewers the connection between the fake reflection and the headshot. Bob, knows the driver fired on Kennedy and this effect proves it beyond any doubt. Bob, is a wannabe conspiracy theorist which means the driver did it, is off limits. This should teach anybody out there...do not try to use the film to disprove an obvious fact because some sleuth may come along and use it against you. After this idiot found out I was using his stupid video to prove the film was altered he went back and enhanced the effect to better hide the fake white and fake mist causing and hiding the headshot from the front.

The above effect was created to hide the fake reflection and fake blood mist from working in sync to cause and hide the heashot coming from the driver. Watch the fake white extend in unison with the red mist between 312-313.

You can see the back of the head start to gape with the fake mist and open entirely with the fake red blotch.

312-313

The Certified Idiot himself.

krammer · Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 138

Yeah Peter, you should ignore the well reasoned analysis by Bob Harris and instead believe this tripe about the driver doing it..

Laughing

Big Boss · Joined: 04 May 2008 Posts: 768 Location: Outer Heaven

Greer did it = Disinfo. Also, it is good to study the mechanics of HOW it happened (the hit itself) but don't let the actual planners get away with it. I bet the Bilderberg meeting that year was very interesting.

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

7forever · Joined: 24 May 2011 Posts: 301

Peter

Somehow, the CIA handbook on assassinations likely has a chapter on chauffeurs shooting their rides in plain sight while driving etc. etc.

When the brain tells the eyes what to see....

I have had a few exchanges with Bob and he is reasonable as well as reasoned. His scholarship is auto-didactic but pretty thorough. For the time being, his analysis is rigorous enough for me.