FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
IMF Boss Taken Out In NWO v. EU Powerplay
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8721

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 7:15 pm    Post subject: IMF Boss Taken Out In NWO v. EU Powerplay Reply with quote

First, the astonishing story,
reported first by the New York
Post and just now by the NYT:

IMF boss Strauss-Kahn pulled off plane,
arrested in sodomy probe

Last Updated: 7:15 PM, May 14, 2011
Posted: 6:33 PM, May 14, 2011

The French political bigshot who heads the International Monetary Fund was arrested for allegedly sodomizing a Manhattan hotel maid today — getting hauled off an Air France flight just moments before takeoff from Kennedy Airport, police sources told The Post.

Three Port Authority detectives pulled Dominique Strauss-Kahn from the plane’s first-class cabin just two minutes before it was due to depart for Paris, the sources said.

Strauss-Kahn, 62, was turned over to NYPD officers from the Midtown South precinct, and the case is being investigated by the Special Victims Unit.

The trouble began around noon today, when a housekeeper entered Strauss-Kahn’s room at the Sofitel on West 44th Street.

Strauss-Kahn was in his bathroom, said sources. He emerged from the bathroom naked, said the sources, and grabbed her.

Then, Strauss-Kahn allegedly threw the housekeeper on the room’s bed and forced her to perform oral sex on him, said the sources.

Strauss-Kahn let the maid leave — and soon afterward, headed off to Kennedy Airport for his flight to Paris.

The NYPD’s special victims unit is investigating the case, the sources said.

His arrest tonight could force him to postpone a planned meeting in Berlin on Sunday with German chancellor Angela Merkel.

Strauss-Kahn, a leader of France’s Socialist Party, is the leading rival to President Nicholas Sarkozy in the 2012 election.

Sarkozy was said in a news report yesterday to have begun a smear campaign against his rival that focused on his lavish lifestyle — including Strauss-Kahn’s purchase of suits from the same tailor who clothes President Obama.

But Strauss-Kahn seems able to find trouble on his own. In 2008, he publicly admitted to "an error of judgment" for having an affair with an IMF subordinate.

In France’s 2007 vote, Strauss-Kahn lost the Socialist Party nomination to Segolene Royal, who in turn fell to defeat against Sarkozy, leader of the right-wing Union for a Popular Movement.

But Sarkozy, who still sees Strauss-Kahn as his likeliest electoral rival, is believed in France to have maneuvered him out of France by backing him to head the Washington-based International Monetary Fund.

Strauss-Kahn is married to New York-born Anne Sinclair, a leading French TV journalist.

He was France’s Minister of Economy and Finance from 1997 to 1999, when he resigned to battle charges he was paid for consulting work he never did. But judges decided he really did the work, and prosecutors were forced to admit they had no evidence of fraudulent motive.


By sheer coincidence (ahem) an ally of the IMF boss and former French
finance minister was earlier Saturday reported to be rallying to his
defense after a smear campaign by French President, Nicolas Sarkozy
--who fears that Strauss-Kahn could be potent rival in the 2012 French
presidential election:

IMF's Strauss-Kahn facing French smear campaign - ally

Reuters | 06:52 PM,May 14,2011

PARIS (Reuters) - A close ally of Dominique Strauss-Kahn, possible Socialist candidate in France's presidential election, said on Saturday the IMF chief was the target of a smear campaign by President Nicolas Sarkozy's camp.

Strauss Kahn, front-runner in surveys of voting intentions ahead of next April's election, is taking legal action over media reports which portray him as having a luxury lifestyle.

"There is now a totally structured and orchestrated campaign, which has already been announced by Mr Sarkozy and his closest allies, to attack the character of Strauss-Kahn, Socialist politician Jean-Marie Le Guen told Europe 1 radio. "The Elysee (Sarkozy's office) has for months been clear on the idea that they would attack (his) personality," he added.

Asked about the accusations, an Elysee spokesman said: "we have no comment to make on these claims." Jean Veil, Strauss-Kahn's lawyer, said on Friday he had been asked to start legal action against a French newspaper on the grounds it had published false information about his lifestyle.

He cited, as one of what he said were several inaccurate details in the report, the assertion that Strauss-Kahn had lavished large sums on suits from a luxury tailor in Washington described as serving U.S. President Barack Obama.

"His suits are perfectly normal and allegations which are now spread regularly throughout the media are both fabrications and now clearly defamatory," Le Guen said.

The French former finance minister, who has yet to say if he will run for French president and would have to quit as head of the Washington-based International Monetary Fund if he does so, also served notice to others ahead of an election campaign that many predict could get dirty.

(Reporting by Patrick Vignal, John Irish and Emmanuel Jarry)

Personally, I have a lot of trouble believing that Strauss-Kahn was
willing to potentially put his bid for the French presidency on the line
for a few of minutes of oral sex.

Furthermore, a male forcing someone into oral sex --without a loaded
gun at the ready -- is a risky business, for obvious reasons.

I have no problem believing that Sarkozy's dirty tricks boys -with some
help from French Intel- have engaged in a gutter level smear job.

After all this is the same president who has banned the burka in France -
not on principle-- but in the hopes of garnering some of the right-wing

Strauss-Kahn is/was scheduled to meet Angela Merkel on Sunday
to discuss the Greek fiscal crisis - so whomever is messing with him
is also screwing around with the Eurozone.

Dirty tricks indeed.

Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.

Last edited by Fintan on Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:55 pm; edited 7 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 3861

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I find it a bit hard to swallow too. vomit

[I'll get my coat.]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8721

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing Laughing Laughing
Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 728
Location: Surfing The Waves

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atm wrote:
Yeah, I find it a bit hard to swallow too. vomit

[I'll get my coat.]


Truth fears no questions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 3861

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome back to the fray, Kathy.

Stay a while longer, won't you?

atm Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 281
Location: The Former Republic of the U.S.

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find this whole thing very interesting. What did this guy have to gain or lose in all of this. Maybe she was hot and he was horny. Who knows?

A famous quote is due here.


" When a man is running down the street with a butcher knife and a hard on, I figure he's not out collecting for the Red Cross." "I shoot the bastard. That's my policy."
Inspector Harry Callahan

The Lies have always been different at every Level...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8721

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 10:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's certainly a lot of smoke in this case
--indicatng the potential for a significant fire.

The question being: who set the fire and why?

If this was a takedown for French political reasons then
that would be scandalous - but hardly earth-sharrering.

Of much greater interest is whether this has geopolitical
and geoeconomic motivations.

But let's just highlight pivotal facts which
might inform us whether this was political.

The questions of timing and clearance
for the removal of Strauss-Kahn from a
Paris-bound flight are vital:

The alleged sexual assault occurred around 1 p.m., police told the Associated Press.

The housekeeper told authorities she entered Strauss-Kahn’s suite at the luxury Sofitel hotel not far from Manhattan’s Times Square at about 1 p.m., and that he attacked her. She told police she was planning to clean the spacious $3,000-a-night suite, which she thought was empty, according to the AP.

Strauss-Kahn emerged from the bathroom naked, chased her down a hallway and pulled her into a bedroom, where he began to sexually assault her, the woman told police, according to the AP. She said she fought him off, but he then dragged her into the bathroom, according to the account.

The woman was able to break free again, escaped the room and told hotel staff what had happened, and they called police, authorities said. Strauss-Kahn bolted the hotel room, leaving behind his cell phone, police told the AP.

The NYPD learned Strauss-Kahn was on a plane bound for France and asked officers with the Port Authority of New York to board the plane and remove him.

At 4:40 p.m., about 10 minutes before Air France Flight 23 was to take off Saturday, officers with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey removed Strauss-Kahn, authorities said. They did not handcuff him. They then turned him over to the police.

Needless to say, there is no way the PA cops are
going to haul Strauss-Kahn off a plane unless
they have clearance at the very highest level.

With the alleged assault taking place at 1pm, the police
cannot have been in full posession of the substantive facts
before 2pm at the earliest. Then the case would have to
move up the chain of command in the police department.

At that point the State Department would have to be informed
and again the case would have to move up the chain of command
in the State Department. The White House would then be involved.

So we have about two and a half hours for investigation and for the
strength of the complainant's case to be judged strong enough to
go ahead and pull the head of the IMF off a plane.

What if the complainant turns out to be a fruitcake with a history
of false complaints in other police departments or a mental health
background featuring a recent release from a medical psychiatric
facility or currenty be on medication impairing mental capacity.

Hedging their bets, authorities might well have simply processed
the complaint, conducted interviews and begun deep background
checks into the complainant. After all, Srauss-Kahn could have
been invited to voluntarily face charges at a later date and simply
have been subjected to extradition proceedings if he refused.

But, in little more than a couple of hours, all involved were prepared
to stake their careers on a preemptive move which immediately
opened up a geopolitical scandal at the highest level.

I don't know if that dog will hunt. However, no careers would have
been at risk if the move against Strauss-Kahn was sanctioned at
the highest level in the US administration.

Was this accident or design?

Srauss-Kahn was a somewhat notorious philanderer, but in as much
as that signals his possible guilt, it also made him a perfect target for
a deliberate lure:

....friends and colleagues said that even though "he had an interest in women" using violence would have been completely out of character. "This does not resemble the man I know," said former Socialist Party boss Francois Hollande. His wife, too, defended him. Others have suggested he is a victim of some kind of international conspiracy. One of his allies said: "Everyone knows that his weakness is seducing women. That's how they got to him." The woman - a councillor - said the aim was to "de-capitate the IMF". ....

So who benefits from his downfall?

Obviously President Nicolas Sarkozy. It will not boost his poll ratings but he will face candidates with nothing like the standing of Mr Strauss-Kahn. The head of the IMF was a heavyweight, a big beast who has been at the heart of international efforts to prevent a global recession. He exuded experience and competence. Mr Sarkozy will be more confident he can pick off the other Socialist candidates. Francois Hollande, for instance, has no experience as a minister. Others like Martine Aubry and Segolene Royale may well damage themselves fighting each other.


Possible conspiracy motives beyond the issue
of the French presidency have also emerged:

This being France, within minutes of the first news of D.S.K.’s arrest, there were rumors that he was the victim of a plot. Christine Boutin, the leader of the Christian Democrats in France, declared that D.S.K. had been entrapped, although she did not specify by whom, or how—but there was no shortage of possibilities floating in the French ether today: Sarkozy, of course, or Socialist rivals, or else, I heard someone say, the Russians who are unhappy with how he has dealt with them at the I.M.F., or maybe the Greeks, whose economy has self-destructed almost as thoroughly as he now has.....

D.S.K.’s behavior, in and of itself, was just too suicidal to make sense entirely by itself.


Meanwhile JP Morgan's boy John Lipsky is taking over the IMF
on an interim basis --but don't read too much into that, because
Lipsky was already flagged to leave the IMF.

A more likely replacement for Strauss-Kahn would be Christine Lagarde.

Lagarde woos Asia in possible IMF push

Why Lagarde will be the next IMF managing director

ADB, G20 Ministers, IMF to Discuss International
Monetary System in High-Level Panel

Lagarde is another NWO stollie, but she didn't need Strauss-Kahn to be
shoved aside to make way for her. He was going to step down anyway
to make his bid for the French presidency. The fact that he was set to
leave the IMF soon is the best argument against this being a geopolitical
plot of some kind.

But if you still favor the global aspects, then this article will suit you:

The latest plan was almost ready for launch, 14 May. Federal officials
invited Strauss-Kahn to New York, arranged the hotel and travel, and set
the agenda for a final review before going public on Strauss-Kahn's last
plan to roll US debt into European debt, in which the Federal Reserve, and
all its State banks, as well as European central banks would disappear.
We know what happened, next.


However, at this point the breadcrumbs are more lilely to lead
back to Sarkozy and Christine Legarde --both of whom feature
in this article by Thierry Meyssan , about whom I have expressed
doubts over the 9/11 issue, but whose facts below on Sarkozy
contain enough to truth to be worth reading:

CIA planted hazar's agent as President of the French Republic
Mr Sarkozy and the CIA.

Based on Thierry Meyssan's

"Operation Sarkozy"

Editor’s Note: The article discussed below is included at the end of the document, both in translation and in the original French. Translation into English by Robert Thompson, with additional edits from Siv O’Neall.

A most interesting study dated 14th July 2008 by Thierry Meyssan, entitled Operation Sarkozy, has been brought to my attention on how the CIA managed to place one of its agents, namely Mr Nicolas Sarkozy, as president of the French Republic.

To make his point, Mr Meyssan does not content himself with vague conjecture, but puts together checkable facts relating to the relationship between our President and the CIA (the well-known terrorist organisation financed by the tax-payers in the USA), and the USA establishment in general, with a view to ensuring that French policy should be dramatically re-aligned to serve the interests of the present USA administration (not, of course, the people of the USA).

The links between various arms of the USA establishment and Mr Sarkozy are much closer than I could ever have imagined, although I was aware of a fair number of the facts reported and examined by Mr Meyssan. I had not however thought, and this is indeed my own fault, how closely these links tie up with other links with groups on both sides of the Atlantic allied, or similar, to the Mafia and other conspiratorial bodies based in Italy and neighbouring states as well as being well entrenched in the USA.

Acceptance of the arguments put forward by Mr Meyssan serves to explain many of the otherwise seemingly inexplicable decisions made by Mr Sarkozy since he took over from Jacques Chirac in 2007, as well as giving very personal private reasons (previously totally unknown to me, but then I am not a fan of the gossip columns) for the obvious dislike, and perhaps even hatred, which Mr Chirac has for his successor.

This article should be read by everyone as the implications are extremely serious for the future of the world. I make this claim not because France is still a great power -- it is not and most of us recognise this -- but it shows a more subtle means of achieving a coup d'état than using military or other violent means. Mr Meyssan very carefully tracks the whole story of Mr Sarkozy's rise within the ranks of the successive parties which have claimed to be "Gaulliste" (as following the broad lines of policy laid down by the General, later President, but many of us still think of him as the great leader during the Second World War from 1940 onwards). It is a tale of most cunning duplicity supported by hyper-intelligent backing from within the USA establishment.

If the conclusions reached by Mr Meyssan are correct, and I can see no reason to doubt his analysis of the facts, then Mr Sarkozy is even more dangerous than he has so far appeared to be, and the poor and the oppressed can expect to suffer almost anywhere in the world from his actions on behalf of his masters in the USA. The Arab world, above all others, can expect to be the victim of highly sophisticated concerted trickery as he does everything that he can to crush any moves which the people may try to make towards freedom from tyranny, wherever such moves might in any way limit the greedy ambitions of those who rule the USA.


Nicolas Sarkozy should be judged on his actions and not on his personality.

But when his actions surprise even his own electors, it is legitimate to examine in detail his biography and to ask about the alliances which brought him to power. Thierry Meyssan decided to write the truth about the origins of the President of the French Republic. All the information contained in this article is verifiable, with the exception of two imputations, pointed out by the author who assumes sole responsibility for them.

The French people, weary of the over-long presidencies of François Mitterrand and Jacques Chirac, elected Nicolas Sarkozy and counted on his energy to revitalise their country. They hoped for a break with the years of immobilism and superannuated ideologies. They have had a break with the principles which form the foundation of the French nation. They have been stupefied by this "hyper president", every day grabbing hold of another new file, drawing the right and the left to him, thus disposing of all the land-marks to the point of creating complete confusion.

Like children who have just done something very stupid, the French are too busy finding excuses to admit the extent of the damage and of their naïvety. This makes them refuse all the more to see who Nicolas Sarkozy is, which they ought to have realised long ago.

The man is clever. Like an illusionist, he has diverted their attention by offering them his private life as a spectacle and in posing in celebrity magazines, to the point of making them overlook his political history.

Let the sense of this article be fully understood: it is not to reproach Mr Sarkozy with his links of family, friends and professional contacts, but to reproach him with having hidden his links from the French people who believed that they were electing a free man.

To understand how a man in whom all agree they see an agent of the United States and Israel has been able to become the head of the Gaullist party, then the President of the French Republic, one must go back in time. Far back. We must follow a long digression during which we shall introduce the protagonists who are today taking their revenge.

Family secrets

At the end of the Second World War, the USA secret services counted on the Italo-US godfather Lucky Luciano to control the security of American ports and to prepare the allied landings in Sicily.

Luciano's contacts with the US services passed above all through Frank Wisner Sr. then, when the 'godfather' was freed and went into exile in Italy, through his Corsican 'ambassador', Étienne Léandri.

In 1958, the United States, worried about a possible victory of the FLN in Algeria which would have opened North Africa to Soviet influence, decided to give rise to a military coup d'état in France. The operation was organised jointly by the Planning Direction of the CIA - in theory run by Frank Wisner Sr.- and by NATO. But Wisner had already sunk into dementia so that it was his successor, Allan Dulles, who supervised the action. From Algiers, the French Generals formed a Committee of Public Safety which exerted pressure on the civil government in Paris and forced it to give full powers to General De Gaulle without any need to use force.

However, Charles De Gaulle was not the pawn whom the Anglo-Saxons believed they could manipulate. To start with, he tried to find a way out of the colonial contradiction by giving wide autonomy to the overseas territories within a French Union. But it was already too late to save the French Empire since the colonised peoples did not believe in the promises from the metropolis and insisted on their independence. After having successfully led fierce campaigns of repression against the independentists, De Gaulle realised what had to be done. Showing rare political wisdom, he decided to give each colony its independence.

This U-turn was seen as a betrayal by most of those who brought him to power. The CIA and NATO then backed all sorts of plots to get rid of him, including a failed putsch and some forty attempts to assassinate him. However, some of his partisans approved of his political evolution. Around Charles Pasqua, they formed the SAC, a militia to protect him.

Pasqua is both a Corsican crook and a former member of the resistance. He married the daughter of a Canadian bootlegger who made a fortune during prohibition. He ran the Ricard company which, after having dealt in absinthe, a forbidden drink, made itself respectable by selling anisette. However, the company continued to serve as a cover for all sorts of deals in relation with the Italo-New Yorker Genovese family, that of Lucky Luciano. It was therefore not surprising that Pasqua called on Étienne Léandri (Luciano's "ambassador") to recruit strong arm men and build up a Gaullist militia. A third man played an important role in the formation of the SAC, De Gaulle's former body-guard, Achille Peretti -another Corsican.

Thus protected, De Gaulle drew up with panache a policy of national independence. While confirming that he belonged to the Atlantic camp, he questioned the Anglo-Saxon leadership. He objected to the entry of the United Kingdom into the European Common Market (1961 and 1967); he refused the deployment of UNO blue helmets in the Congo (1961); he encouraged Latin American states to break free of US imperialism (speech in Mexico, 1964); he expelled NATO from France and withdrew form the Integrated Command Structure of the Atlantic Alliance (1966); he denounced the Viet-Nam War (speech in Phnon Penh, 1966); he condemned Israeli expansionism during the Six Day War (1967); he supported the independence of Quebec (speech in Montreal 1967) ; etc...

At the same time, De Gaulle consolidated France's power by giving it a military-industrial complex including a nuclear dissuasion force, and by guaranteeing its supply of energy. He usefully separated the troublesome Corsicans from his entourage by giving them overseas missions. Thus Étienne Léandri became the dealer for the Elf group (now Total), while Charles Pasqua became the confidant of the heads of state in French-speaking Africa.

Aware that he could now defy the Anglo-Saxons everywhere at the same time, De Gaulle allied himself with the Rothschild family. He chose as Prime Minister the Director of the Bank, Georges Pompidou. The two men formed an efficient tandem. The political audacity of the first never lost sight of the economic realism of the second.

When De Gaulle resigned, in 1969, Georges Pompidou briefly succeeded him as President before being carried off by cancer. The historical Gaullists did not accept his leadership and were worried by his excessively anglophile attitude. They cried treason when Pompidou, seconded by the Secretary General of the Elyse Eduard Balladur, allowed "perfidious Albion" into the European Common Market.

The making of Nicolas Sarkozy

Having thus described the background, let us come back to our principal personage, Nicolas Sarkozy. Born in 1955, he was the son of a Hungarian nobleman, Pal Sarkösy de Nagy-Bocsa, who fled to France after fleeing the Red Army, and Andrée Mallah, a Jewish lady from Sallonica. After having had three children (Guillaume, Nicolas and François), the couple divorced. Pal Sarkösy de Nagy-Bocsa remarried with an aristocrat, Christine de Ganay, by whom he had two children (Pierre-Olivier and Caroline). Nicolas was not brought up by his parents alone, but passed to and fro in this recomposed family.

His mother became the Secretary of Achille Peretti. After having co-founded the SAC, De Gaulle's body-guard had pursued a brilliant political career. He was elected Député and Mayor of Neuilly-sur-Seine, the richest suburb of the capital, then President of the National Assembly.

Unhappily, in 1972, Achille Peretti was subject to serious accusations. In the United States, the magazine Time revealed the existence of a secret Corsican criminal organisation the 'Union corse ' which was said to control a large share of the traffic in drugs between Europe and America, the famous "French connection" which Hollywood brought to the screen. Based on parliamentary hearings and its own investigations, Time quoted the name of a Mafia boss, Jean Venturi, arrested some years earlier in Canada, who was no other than the commercial representative of Charles Pasqua for the drinks company Ricard. The names of several families were mentioned who were said to run the "Union corse", including the Perettis. Achille denied this, but had to resign from the presidency of the National Assembly and even escaped from a "suicide".

In 1977, Pal Sarközy separated from his second wife, Christine de Ganay, who then linked herself with the number two of the central administration of the Department of State in the United States. She married him and set up home with him in America. The world being small, as is well known, her husband was no other than Frank Wisner Jr., the son of the previous one. The functions of Junior at the CIA are not known, but it was clear that he had an important role there. Nicolas, who remained close to his step-mother, his half-brother and his half-sister, began to turn towards the United States where he "benefitted" from training programmes in the Department of State.

At the same time, Nicolas Sarkozy joined the Gaullist Party. He there met and had contacts with Charles Pasqua more speedily as he was not only a national leader, but also in charge of the local section in the Hauts-de-Seine.

In 1982, Nicolas Sarkozy, having completed his legal training and having been called to the Bar, married Achilles Pretty's niece. His best man was Charles Pasqual. As an Avocet, Maître Sarkozy looked after the interests of the Corsican friends of his mentors. He bought a property in Corsica, at Vice, and thought of making his name more Corsican by replacing the 'y' with an 'I': Sarkozy.

The following year, he was elected Mayor of Neuilly-sure-Seine in the place of his uncle-in-law, Achilles Pretty, stricken by a heart attack.

However, Nicolas did not take long to betray his wife and, from 1984 onward, he had a hidden liaison with Cecilia, the wife of the most famous French television personality at the time, Jacques Martin, whom he had met when celebrating their marriage as Mayor of Neuilly. This double life lasted for five years, before the lovers left their respective spouses to set up a new household.

Nicolas was a witness at the marriage, in 1992, of Jacques Chirac's daughter, Claude, to an editorialist at Le Figaro. he could not stop himself from seducing Claude and to have a brief affair with her, while living officially with Cecilia. The betrayed husband committed suicide by taking drugs. The break between the Chirac's and Nicolas Sarkozy was brutal and permanent.

In 1993, the left lost the parliamentary elections. President François Mitterrand refused to resign and entered into a cohabitation with a Prime Minister from the right, Jacques Chirac. His ambition was to become President and thought of then forming a tandem with Eduard Balladur comparable with that of De Gaulle and Pompidou, and he refused to be Prime Minister again and left the place to his "friend for over thirty years", Eduard Balladur. Despite his dubious past, Charles Pasqual became Minister of the Interior. Even if he kept a firm grip Moroccan marijuana, he took advantage of his position to legalise his other activities by taking control of the casinos, gaming and racing in French-speaking Africa. He also established links in Saudi Arabia and in Israel an became an honorary officer in the Mossad. As for Nicolas Sarkozy, he was Minister of the Budget and government spokesman.

In Washington, Frank Wisner Jr. took over from Paul Wolfowitz as being responsible for political planning in the Defence Department. Nobody commented on the links which he had with the French government's spokesman.

This was when the tension within the Gaullist Party came back as thirty years earlier between the historic Gaullists and the financial right, in the person of Balladur. The novelty was that Charles Pasqua and with him the young Nicolas Sarkozy betrayed Jacques Chirac to come closer to the Rothschild tendency. Everything went wrong. The conflict reached its peak in 1995 when Édouard Balladur put himself forward against his ex-friend Jacques Chirac for the presidential election, and was beaten. Above all, following the instructions received from London and Washington, the Balladur government opened negotiations for adhesion to the European Union and to NATO of the States in Central and Eastern Europe, freed from Soviet control.

Everything went wrong in the Gaullist Party where the friends of yester-year were ready to kill one another. To finance his electoral campaign, Édouard Balladur tried to get hold of the Gaullist Party's black funds, hidden within the double accounting system of the oil company Elf. Hardly had the old Étienne Léandri died, when Judges looked into the company and its bosses were incarcerated. But Balladur, Pasqua and Sarkozy never managed to recuperate the booty.

Crossing the desert

Throughout his first term, Jacques Chirac kept Nicolas Sarkozy at a distance. The man became discreet during this long period of crossing the desert. Discreetly, he continued to make links in financial circles.

In 1996, Nicolas Sarkozy having finally managed to end an endless divorce procedure married Cécilia. As witnesses they had the two billionaires Martin Bouygues and Bernard Arnaud (the richest man in the country).

Last act

Well before the Iraq crisis, Frank Wisner Jr. and his colleagues at the CIA were planning the destruction of the Gaullist line and the rise in power of Nicolas Sarkozy. They acted in three stages: firstly the elimination of the leaders of the Gaullist Party and taking over this body, then the elimination of the principal rival on the right and the investiture by the Gaullist Party for the presidential election, and finally the elimination of any serious challenger from the left in order to be sure of carrying off the presidential election.

For years, the media were kept excited by posthumous revelations by a real property speculator. Before dying of a serious illness, he had registered for reasons never made clear a video confession. For even more obscure reasons, the "cassette" fell into the hands of a highly placed member of the Socialist Party, Dominique Strauss-Khan, who passed it on indirectly to the press.

Even if the confessions of the speculator did not lead to any judicial sanction, they opened a Pandora's box. The principal victim of the successive affairs was to be the Prime Minister Alain Juppé. To protect Chirac, he alone took on all the criminal offences. Putting Juppé out of the way left the way clear for Nicolas Sarkozy to take over the running of the Gaullist Party.

Sarkozy then made use of his position to force Jacques Chirac to take him back into the government, despite their mutual hatred. He was definitively to be the Minister of the Interior. What a mistake! In this post, he controlled the Préfets and the interior intelligence network which he used to put his appointees into the major branches of the administration.

He also dealt with Corsican matters. The Préfet Claude Érignac had been assassinated. Although no-one had claimed it, the murder was immediately interpreted as a challenge made by the independentists to the Republic. After a long hunt, the police managed to arrest a fleeing suspect, Yvan Colonna, the son of a Socialist Député. Without regard for the presumption of innocence, Nicolas Sarkozy announced this arrest accusing the suspect of being the assassin. This news was too good two days before a referendum being organised by the Minister of the Interior in Corsica to modify the status of the Island. However that may be, the voters rejected the Sarkozy project which, according to some, favoured Mafia interests.

Although Yvan Colonna was later found guilty, he has always claimed his innocence and no material evidence has been found against him. Strangely, the man refused to talk, preferring to be found guilty than to reveal what he knows. We here reveal that the Préfet Érignac was not killed by nationalists, but shot by the hit-man, Igor Pecatte, immediately sent off to Angola where he has been taken on by the Elf group. The motive for the crime was closely linked to the previous functions of Érignac, in charge of the African networks of Charles Pasqua at the Ministry of Cooperation. As for Yvan Colonna, he has been a personal friend of Nicolas Sarkozy for many years and their children are in friendly contact with one another.

A new affair came to light: false listings were circulating which untruthfully accused certain personalities of hiding bank accounts in Luxembourg, with Clearstream. Among the personalities defamed: Nicolas Sarkozy. He took the case to court and let it seem that his right-wing rival for the presidential election, the Prime Minister, Dominique de Villepin, had organised this machination. He did not hide his intention to have him sent to prison. In reality, the false listings were put in circulation by members of the Franco-American Foundation, of which John Negroponte was the President and Frank Wisner Jr. the Director. What the Judges did not know and we reveal here was that the listings were made in London by a joint office of the CIA and the MI6, Hakluyt & Co, of which Frank Wisner Jr. is also Director. Villepin fights back against the accusations, but he is charged, forbidden to leave his home and, de facto, temporarily removed from political life. The way is open for on the right for Nicolas Sarkozy.

It remained necessary to neutralise opposition candidates. The membership dues to the Socialist Party have gone down to a symbolic level to attract new members. Suddenly thousands of young people applied for membership cards. Among them are at least ten thousand new members who are in reality members of the Trotskyite "Lambertist" Party (so called from the name of their founder Pierre Lambert). This small extreme left formation has a history of working for the CIA against the Stalinist communists during the Cold War (it was the equivalent of the SD/USA of Max Shatchman, which formed the neoconservatives in the USA). This was not the first time that the "Lambertists" had infiltrated the Socialist Party.

In particular they planted two famous CIA agents: Lionel Jospin (who became Prime Minister) and Jean-Christophe Cambadélis, the principal adviser to Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

Primaries were organised in the Socialist Party to appoint its candidate for the presidential election. Two personalities were competing: Laurent Fabius and Ségolène Royal. Only the first represented a danger for Sarkozy. Dominique Strauss-Kahn became a candidate with the task of eliminating Fabius at the last moment. This he was able to do thanks to the votes of the infiltrated "Lambertist" militants who voted not for him but for Royal. The operation was possible because Strauss-Kahn, of Moroccan Jewish origin, had been on the US payroll for many years. The French were not aware that he lectured at Stanford, where he had been taken on by the Provost of the University, Condoleezza Rice. As soon as he took office, Nicolas Sarkozy and Condoleezza Rice thanked Strauss-Kahn by having him appointed to head the International Monetary Fund.

First days at the Élysée Palace

On the evening of the second round of the presidential election, when the opinion polls announced his probable victory, Nicolas Sarkozy made a short speech to the nation from his campaign HQ. Then, contrary to custom, he did not go to celebrate with the militants of his party, but went to Fouquet's. The famous restaurant on the Champs-Élysées, which had once been the meeting place for the "Union Corse" now belongs to the casino operator Dominique Desseigne. It was placed at the disposition of the elected President to receive his friends and principal donors to his campaign. A hundred or so guests crowded in, the richest men in France were there with the casino bosses.

Then the elected President allowed himself a few days of earned rest. Taken there in a private Falcon-900 to Malta, he rested there on the Paloma, the 65 metre yacht of his friend Vincent Bolloré, a billionaire formed at the Banque Rothschild.

Finally, Nicolas Sarkozy was invested as President of the French Republic. The first decree which he signed was not to proclaim an amnesty, but to allow casinos to be operated by his friends Desseigne et Partouche and increase the number of gambling machines.

He formed his working team and his government. With no surprise, one finds there a very worrying casino owner (Minister of Youth and Sport) and lobbyist for the casinos of his friend Desseigne (who became spokesman for the "Gaullist" Party).

Nicolas Sarkozy relied above all on four men: Claude Guéant, Secretary General of the Élysée Palace. He was the former right arm of Charles Pasqua. François Pérol, Assistant Secretary General of the Élysée. He was a managing partner of the Banque Rothschild. Jean-David Lévitte, diplomatic adviser. Son of the former Director of the Jewish Agency. French Ambassador to UNO, he was removed from his post by Chirac who considered him too close to George Bush. Alain Bauer, the man in the shadow. His name does not appear in any directory. He is in charge of the intelligence services. Grandson of the Grand Rabbi of Lyon, former Grand-Master of the Grand Orient of France (the principal Masonic obedience in France) and former number 2 of the USA National Security Agency in Europe.

Frank Wisner Jr., who had in the meantime been appointed special envoy by President Bush for the independence of Kosovo, insisted that Bernard Kouchner be appointed Minister for Foreign Affairs with a dual priority mission: The independence of Kosovo and the ending of France's Arab policy.

Kouchner, of Baltic Jewish origin, started his career by taking part in creating a humanitarian NGO. Thanks to money from the National Endowment for Democracy, he took part in operations for Zbigniew Brzezinski in Afghanistan, alongside Osama Ben Laden and the Karzaï brothers against the Soviets. He could be found in the 90s alongside Alija Izetbegoviç in Bosnia-Herzegovina. From 1999 to 2001, he was the High Representative of UNO in Kosovo.

Under the control of the younger brother of President Hamid Karzaï, Afghanistan became the largest producer in the world of opium poppies. The juice is transformed on the spot into heroin and transported by the US Air Force to Camp Bondsteed (Kosovo). There the drug is taken over by the men of Haçim Thaçi who distribute it principally in Europe and also in the United States. The profits are used to finance the illegal operations of the CIA. Karzaï and Thaçi are long-time personal friends of Bernard Kouchner, who obviously knows nothing of their criminal activities despite the international reports which have been made on the subject.

To complete his government, Nicolas Sarkozy appoints Christine Lagarde, Minister of Economy and Finance. She had made all her career in the United States where she ran the prestigious law firm of Baker & McKenzie. Within Dick Cheney's the Center for International & Strategic Studies, she co-chaired with Zbigniew Brzezinski a working group which supervised the privatisations in Poland. She had organised intense lobbying for Lockheed Martin against the French aircraft manufacturer Dassault.

A new escapade during the summer. Nicolas, Cécilia, their joint mistress and their children were offered holidays in the USA at Wolfenboro, not far from President Bush's property. The bill this time was paid by Robert F. Agostinelli, an Italo-New York merchant banker, a Zionist and a leading neo-conservative who gives his views in Commentary, the magazine of the American Jewish Committee.

The success of Nicolas spreads to his half-brother Pierre-Olivier. Under the Americanised name of "Oliver", he was appointed by Frank Carlucci (who was the number 2 of the CIA after having been recruited by Frank Wisner Sr.) Director of a new investment fund of the Carlyle Group (the joint management company of the portfolios of the Bushes and the Ben Ladens). Having become the 5th deal-maker in the world, he manages the principal assets of the sovereign funds of Kuwait and Singapore.

The popularity of the President is in free-fall in the opinion polls. One of his advisers in communication, Jacques Séguéla, planned to distract the attention of the public with new "celebrity stories". The announcement of the divorce from Cécilia was published by Libération, the newspaper of his friend Édouard de Rothschild, to cover up the demonstrators' slogans during a day of general strikes. Going further still, the communicator organised a meeting with the singer and former model, Carla Bruni. Several days later, her affair with the President became official and the media din again covered up the political criticisms. A few weeks later still and it was Nicolas' third marriage. This time the witnesses whom he chose were Mathilde Agostinelli (the wife of Robert) and Nicolas Bazire, former private secretary of Édouard Balladur who had become a managing partner at the Banque Rothschild.

When will the French open their eyes to see what they should do?



Maid picked IMF chief out of line-up

Dominique Strauss-Kahn faces further claim of sexual assault

Greece to Plead for More Aid as Arrest of IMF’s Strauss-Kahn Clouds Talks

Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8721

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2011 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


The female complainant in the DSK case lives in the Bronx
with her husband and has a 16-year-old daughter.

A Sofitel official said the maid had worked for the hotel for three years
and is a "satisfactory employee." At the maid's Bronx apartment building,
neighbor Donovan Mitchell, 21, described her as "low key" and said, "She
doesn't bother anybody." http://nydn.us/j7rVBG

That doesn't exactly fit the profile of an intel stooge.

But neither does DSK's behaviour fit the profile
of a man fleeing from the scene of a crime:

New details emerged of the scramble to detain Mr. Strauss-Kahn in the
hours after the alleged incident Saturday. A key moment came, police
said, when Mr. Strauss-Kahn called the hotel to ask if he had left
his cellphone there. A hotel security official fibbed and said he did
have the phone—then asked for Mr. Strauss-Kahn's location to meet
him and return it.
Police made the arrest at New York's John F.
Kennedy International Airport, where Mr. Strauss-Kahn had boarded
a flight for France. http://on.wsj.com/loZzBM

So DSK is at the airport -within sight of leaving the US,
but he calls the hotel and tells them where to find him??

Hardly the act of a guilty man in flight.

And according to leaks from his defense team DSK can blow the case
against him out of the water with an iron-clad alibi for the time of the
alleged assault. Rough translation from a French report:

According to his lawyers, DSK had left the hotel an hour
before the alleged assault on her maid.

DSK then joined his daughter for lunch at a New York
The defense is preparing to give material
evidence and testimony from the luncheon. He then took a taxi
to the airport. Once at JFK, DSK would have realized the loss of
one of his mobile phones at the hotel.

The lawyers were surprised at the very unattractive appearance
of the young woman.


There's also a whiff of set-up around the fact that Jonathan Pinet,
a well-followed Twitterer, and member of the right-wing UMP party
tweeted DSK's troubles within 25 minutes of his being hauled off the
Air France flight.

Pinet says he had a source at the hotel who informed him of the
case. If so, that's a heckuva piece of good fortune.

Un jeune populaire actif donc (cf ses contributions sur le site des jeunes
populaires), adepte des campagnes Web de l'UMP, qui connaît une
personne qui travaille précisément dans cet hôtel de New York... Tout
cela en moins de 25 min.


Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8721

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2011 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Strauss-Kahn appears in NY court

By FT reporters -May 16 2011 07:25 | Last updated: May 16 2011 16:18

5 minutes ago

Dominique Strauss-Kahn briefly appeared in a New York court on Monday
to face a complaint over an alleged sexual assault by the International
Monetary Fund chief on a maid at a hotel in the city.

Mr Strauss-Kahn walked into the courtroom at about 10.50am local time,
looking drawn and wearing the same dark overcoat in which he was
walked before photographers to the booking station of the Manhattan
criminal court on Sunday night.

The judge did not acknowledge his presence. Instead police officers
shepherded him to the bench where defendants sit while waiting for their
docket numbers to be called.

There the IMF boss sat virtually motionless, largely obscured from view by a
wooden cubicle where defendants can consult privately with lawyers.

He stared forward across the courtroom, only glancing occasionally at the
gallery. His daughter, who had sat there on Sunday, was absent.....

Mr Strauss-Kahn is expected to be arraigned at the New York Criminal
Court later on Monday after he allegedly attacked a 32-year-old maid at
a luxury hotel in Manhattan on Saturday. Mr Strauss-Kahn was charged
by police on Saturday with a criminal sex act, attempted rape and
unlawful imprisonment of the maid.

Police said on Sunday night that the maid had picked Mr Strauss-Kahn out
of a line-up. Mr Strauss-Kahn denies wrongdoing.

French media, citing Mr Strauss-Kahn’s lawyers, on Monday said the IMF
chief had checked out of the hotel at around 12.28, an hour before the
alleged assault and had lunch with his daughter in a New York


Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 281
Location: The Former Republic of the U.S.

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2011 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could there be a power grab beginning within a split-up factions of the NWO? We know Sarkosy's angle. This clown is a real pillar of society and all but who's really behind this? I don't think Sarkosy's camp is smart enough, or are they? Economic destabilization of the European Union is what they're after?

The Lies have always been different at every Level...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8721

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYPD Changes It's Story To
Bypsss Strauss-Kahn's Alibi

by Fintan Dunne, BreakForNews.com - 16th May, 2011 @ 6pmET

The NYPD has changed it's account of the timing of the alleged
sexual assault by Dominique Strauss-Kahn on a maid at the New
York Sofitel hotel.

This comes after widely publicized statements by the defense team that
Mr. Strauss-Kahn had an iron clad alibi: he was lunching publicly with his
daughter at the reported 1pm time of the alleged assault.

According to the French newspaper Liberation, recounted by Forbes:

A double sexual attack was thought to have occurred around 1:00 PM
on the 28 floor of the Sofitel New York, deputy commissioner and
spokesman for the NYPD, Paul J. Browne, explained to reporters. The
French daily, though, notes that sources have put DSK’s check out time
closer to noon, with center-right daily Liberation citing police sources
claiming the IMF chief handed in his keys at exactly 12:28 PM.

After leaving his room, DSK is said to have gone to lunch with his
daughter, a graduate student at Columbia University.

That same information, which, if proven, would constitute the IMF chief’s
innocence, is undermined by information gathered by Liberation in New
York. The daily, founded by philosopher and playwright Jean Paul Sartre,
had Paul Browne, NYPD spokesman cited above, saying “”we said initially
that [the attacks] was around 1PM, in fact it was closer to noon


To be pedantic about it, the checkout time now fixed by Liberation is
12:28 PM, which is also "closer to noon" than 1pm, so NYPD deputy
commissioner Browne really needs to be a good deal more specific
than his latest vague assertion.

Why did the NYPD say initially that the attack took place around 1pm
and why are the NYPD changing their story and still being vague about
the actual timing of the alleged assault?

The same NYPD deputy commissioner Browne in a BBC interview, drew
unfair conclusions about the nature of DSK's departure from the hotel --
based on rather flimsy 'evidence':

“Our detectives requested of the airport authorities that they stop the
plane from leaving, went to the airport and took him into custody,”
Mr Browne said.

He added that Mr Strauss-Kahn seemed to have left the hotel “in a hurry”
because he left his mobile phone and other personal belongings behind.


That statement by DC Browne was clearly designed to bias the public
against the defendant --and was an unfair conclusion. Many people
leave personal effects and even cellphones behind in hotel rooms, but
it does not mean they are fleeing the scene of a crime.

In any event his conclusion about haste is counterpointed by an
eyewitness who saw DSK checking out of the hotel:

Police say Strauss-Kahn left his $3,000-a-day suite in such a rush that he
left his mobile phone behind but a French tourist who said she saw him
check out told France 2 television he had appeared calm and in no hurry


Astonishingly, DSK only weeks ago joked in an interview
with French newspaper Liberation about the possibility of
being set-up on rape charges by Sarkozy:

According to the Liberation article:

DSK then talks about ending up in a men's room with Sarkozy, during
an international summit, and asks him to stop the dirty tricks about his
private life.

Wanting to pose as a victim, DSK starts imagining "a woman (he
might have) raped in a parking lot and to whom half a million or
a million euros would be promised to make up such a story..."


Another account of the interview highlights that
DSK thought he was under surveillance:

Only three weeks ago, Strauss-Kahn [] in an interview with French
newspaper Libération [] said he thought he was under surveillance
and named the three principal difficulties he foresaw if he was to
stand for the presidential elections.

"Money, women and the fact I am Jewish." He added: "Yes, I like
women ... so what?" He said he could see himself becoming the
victim of a honey trap: "a woman raped in a car park and who's
been promised 500,000 or a million euros to invent such a story


Meanwhile the judge has turned down an
offer by the defense of $1 million bail:

Assistant District Attorney John A. McConnell ....asked the judge to hold
Strauss-Kahn without bail, saying that his position as IMF head had taken
him out of the country previously and that he was wealthy and doesn’t
live in New York.

"He has almost no incentive to stay in this country and every incentive to
leave," Assistant District Attorney John A. McConnell said. "If he went to
France, we would have no legal mechanism to guarantee his return to this

Defense attorneys had suggested bail be set at $1 million and promised
the IMF managing director would remain in New York City.

Strauss-Kahn was ordered held without bail until Friday, his next court

It's likely that the defense may make another strengthened bid for bail
at next Friday's hearing. They can argue that DSK has no reason to flee,
because his alibi for the now uncertain time of the assault is strong.

Benjamin Brafman, one of Strauss-Kahn's attorneys, argued that "there
is a very, very defensible case and he should be entitled to bail."

By the way, the provability of the case against DSK may be slim enough,
because despite all the hoopla it seems the charges do not allege any
kind of actual penetrative sexual act or actual oral act took place:

The complaint charges Strauss-Kahn, 62, with two counts of criminal sexual act in the first degree, one count of attempted rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment, sexual abuse in the third degree and forcible touching, ABC News reported.

The charges, filed by the Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, said that Strauss-Kahn forcibly touched the housekeeper's breasts, attempted to remove her panty hose, twice "forcibly made contact with his penis and the informant's mouth" and "engaged in oral sexual conduct and anal sexual conduct with another person by forcible compulsion."

Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 8721

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fintan, Could there be a power grab beginning within a split-up factions of
the NWO? We know Sarkosy's angle. This clown is a real pillar of society
and all but who's really behind this? I don't think Sarkosy's camp is smart
enough, or are they? Economic destabilization of the European Union is
what they're after?

I don't think the motivation would have been to damage the Eurozone,
because the IMF is bigger than one individual and no damage is likely.

But this is loking like a faction war by the NWO and their remnants
in the Eurozone versus the European loyalists -- in the wake of the
failure to bring down the euro during Wall St.'s raid earlier this year.

Also looking like a PsyOp to warn leading bEurocrats that the NWO
faction is capable of inflicting damage on any of the top echelon who
won't play NWO ball.

And in practical terms it has the immediate benefit of shoring up the
NWO's stooge Sarkozy for the 2012 French presidential election.

If this is indeed what is going on then it's an indication of how much
the NWO are on the defensive.

How to win friends and influence people... NOT.

Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when open.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.