Uncovered: The Rat's Nest of 9/11

[Raphael]

[noplacebo]

i dont think any of these people like alex jones are disinfo agents, maybe in the scheme of things they play the role of a disinfo agent, maybe at a push given free advertising through certain channels to bring his way of looking at the world to a larger audience, for this will change nothing, as long as we let other people think for us ,to direct us to new pasture to feed upon, whilst reminding us the wolves are lurking just inside the treeline, so stay with me i wil protect you. we do this to ourselves , there are plenty of people like alex jones whom may think they are helping, but are just dealing with things in the same old fear driven way, taking us nowhere, he is absolutely no threat whatsoever to any perceived faction. True leaders allow us within ourselves to dissolve this fear and to think for ourselves by their example .leaders like, martin luther king and ghandi they kill these people.

[atm]

Nien el...

Nine elev...

Nine...

Elev...

11/9 uncov...

[atm]

Raphael

it is called multi-level marketing.

I hope this helps.

[atm]

Who hosts The Fear Factor?

Who hosts Ultimate Fighting Club?

Joe Rogan.

Who is Joe Rogan great friends with? A certain persona in Austin, TX, perhaps?

atm

[Rom]

Fintan
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=75

"Ok here's a breakdown of the term 'CIA FAKES'. They include:
....
....
Mainstream Media, Alternative Media and Internet broadcasting media who either front for,
cooperate with, or are directly employed by intelligence services mentioned above.

The primary objectives of the CIA FAKES are:

- To leverage the Fakes into position as the leadership/spokespersons for the 9/11 skeptics movement.
- To splinter and divide that movement.
- To promote lame, tame and/or booby-trapped questions about 9/11.
- To be sufficiently over-the-top as to prevent the 9/11 issue getting any traction in the media or left-wing.
- To ensure that the movement would not have a politically-active leadership capable of
turning it into an effective political lobby campaign. "
---------


Every media with some editors on the payroll of CIA o.l are CIA Fakes. That make sense to me.

Why exclude mainstream media from the "CIA fakes" list? That does not make sense to me.

Why this link of "fake" and "CIA" specifically to 911 questions, as if 911 is the topic media are occupied about? That does not make sense to me.

In my view CIA, at least the bad faction of CIA, is against Ron Paul. So it becomes logically that the CIA editors will give headlines an anti-Ron Paul-angle.

Right?

Or is it like that CIA editors in alternative media will give headlines a pro-Ron Paul-angle to make sure they don't appear to be CIA editors, but "Ron Paul friends". Then the fake "Ron Paul friends" (most of alternative media?) will undermine the work of the mainstream CIA editors, so they have to work much harder, or even fail in the end?

What is right here?

[Rom]

Very lying CNN story
http://americansjourney.blogspot.com/2011/12/ron-paul-attacked-by-cnn-entire.html

To return the question from CNN about paying back not to be complicit
Should CNN employees return their paycheck after lying stories?
Should presidents return their paycheck when they fail?
CNN idiots

[Fintan]