FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
CGI / Hologram / No Planes
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 46, 47, 48
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps Specifics Investigation
  ::  Previous topic :: Next topic  
Author Message
hawkwind



Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 705

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


_________________
"It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense." - Mark Twain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carcdr



Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 355

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks.

Exactly my point.

Every time this guy hits a group of balls, they scatter outwards - away from each other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rory breakr



Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
rory says:
I don't think a missile nose would survive with it's shape either, but getting back to my point initially - Do you think we are looking at the nose of the plane.

Quote:
carcdr says:
No.

I don't see evidence that a commercial plane hit the Towers.

Basically, we're looking at bullshit. The "nose out" was a mistake - the graphic artists who presented us with the "nose out" simply fucked up. ...


Ok, so I need to clarify the question from above that you responded to:
(And sorry for the delay, my free time is minimal these days.)

Do you think we are looking at the nose of the plane? (real or a composited plane) that shows it nose on the other side of the building?

By referring to the "graphic artists ... fucked up" I assume you are talking about a composited plane.
If it a composited real or an animated plane image that was added to the live feed of the explosion ... my 2 questions remain -

1. what about the frames that do not have the shape (and not close either) to the nose of a plane?

2. how is it possible that the other shots show this same type of explosion if it a unique event?


after all,
we do see the 'nose' type explosion (dark small first, then engulfed by fire-y large):


from the angles that it should be visible:


I don't understand why the Fox 5 shot was "hidden" from the public if all the videos show this.

_________________
If the milk turns out to be sour,
I ain't the kind of p*ssy to drink it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bri



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 2918
Location: Capacious Creek

PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question for No Planers:

If No-Planes is a way to get rid of evidence and make sure everything goes smoothly, how can you rely on C4, thermate, nukes, or beam weapons to do the job without leaving sure-fire evidence?
However, it's possible the beam weapons were from Atlantis. Surprised
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gawker



Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 96

PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This posted yesterday, via Rawstory.com

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Next Level Forum Index -> 9/11 HardCorps Specifics Investigation All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 46, 47, 48
Page 48 of 48

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Theme xand created by spleen.