I don't think a missile nose would survive with it's shape either, but getting back to my point initially - Do you think we are looking at the nose of the plane.
I don't see evidence that a commercial plane hit the Towers.
Basically, we're looking at bullshit. The "nose out" was a mistake - the graphic artists who presented us with the "nose out" simply fucked up. ...
Ok, so I need to clarify the question from above that you responded to:
(And sorry for the delay, my free time is minimal these days.)
Do you think we are looking at the nose of the plane? (real or a composited plane) that shows it nose on the other side of the building?
By referring to the "graphic artists ... fucked up" I assume you are talking about a composited plane.
If it a composited real or an animated plane image that was added to the live feed of the explosion ... my 2 questions remain -
1. what about the frames that do not have the shape (and not close either) to the nose of a plane?
2. how is it possible that the other shots show this same type of explosion if it a unique event?
we do see the 'nose' type explosion (dark small first, then engulfed by fire-y large):
from the angles that it should be visible:
I don't understand why the Fox 5 shot was "hidden" from the public if all the videos show this. _________________ If the milk turns out to be sour,
I ain't the kind of p*ssy to drink it...
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 3008 Location: Capacious Creek
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:41 pm Post subject:
Question for No Planers:
If No-Planes is a way to get rid of evidence and make sure everything goes smoothly, how can you rely on C4, thermate, nukes, or beam weapons to do the job without leaving sure-fire evidence?
However, it's possible the beam weapons were from Atlantis.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum