| :: Previous topic :: Next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CB_Brooklyn
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 32
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lippy
Joined: 04 Aug 2007
Posts: 29
Location: Upper Midwest
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:42 am Post subject: |
  |
|
Just a bump so that this thread does not disappear into oblivion.
This subject really brings out the heavy sarcasm.
CB, you are either on something or you are ONTO something! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
micpsi
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:00 am Post subject: Re: 9/11 and The Hutchison Effect – An Ace in the Hole – Par |
|
|
Wood shows on her website some graphs showing how components of the terrestrial magnetic field recorded at six stations in Alaska fluctuated from the background levels at the time of the planes hitting the towers on 9/11. What she doesn't show you is that the same scale of fluctuations (and bigger) occur often in weeks and months before 9/11 at all these sites! There is nothing statistically significant about the variations recorded by these stations on 9/11. In other words, she cherry-picks the magnetometer data to create the deception that the magnetic field was anomalous on that day, thus suggesting that HAARP was directing exotic physics in the form of directed-energy weapons to cause the destruction of the towers. This is scientific sloppiness of the first order. Either she is incompetent as a scientist and does not know how to evaluate data in an objective way or such elementary errors were deliberate and meant to deceive the unwary into believing her theory.
Make up your own mind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ad.johnson
Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:16 am Post subject: Re: 9/11 and The Hutchison Effect – An Ace in the Hole – Par |
|
|
| micpsi wrote: | | There is nothing statistically significant about the variations recorded by these stations on 9/11. In other words, she cherry-picks the magnetometer data to create the deception that the magnetic field was anomalous on that day, thus suggesting that HAARP was directing exotic physics in the form of directed-energy weapons to cause the destruction of the towers. |
MicPsi does not tell the truth. This chart shows the day before 9/11 and 9/11 itself.
There are others here:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html
MicPsi is trying to say Dr Wood said "HAARP done it". This is not true.
Why is MicPsi doing this? Is this "scientific sloppiness" on his part?
_________________
I use my real name - Andrew Johnson - not some obscure handle. It works for me! Will it work for you?
Ask the tough questions!
http://www.checktheevidence.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ad.johnson
Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bri
Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 2887
Location: Capacious Creek
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hombre
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 967
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bri,
" Thanks you sir " " May I have another "
Nice!
Hombre' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
micpsi
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 6:34 am Post subject: Re: 9/11 and The Hutchison Effect – An Ace in the Hole – Par |
|
|
| ad.johnson wrote: | | micpsi wrote: | | There is nothing statistically significant about the variations recorded by these stations on 9/11. In other words, she cherry-picks the magnetometer data to create the deception that the magnetic field was anomalous on that day, thus suggesting that HAARP was directing exotic physics in the form of directed-energy weapons to cause the destruction of the towers. |
MicPsi does not tell the truth. This chart shows the day before 9/11 and 9/11 itself.
There are others here:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html
MicPsi is trying to say Dr Wood said "HAARP done it". This is not true.
Why is MicPsi doing this? Is this "scientific sloppiness" on his part? |
I am telling the truth. There are plenty of previous days before 9/11 that show just as large (if not larger) sudden fluctuations of magnetic filed components. Take your pick here:
http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/table_index/2001_table.html
There are dozens and dozens of examples recorded there of sudden changes in the magnetic field components suddenly altering, proving that there is no statistical significance to Wood's cherry-picked data:
The fact that changes were recorded just before the first plane hit the North Tower was pure coincidence, as is confirmed by the fact that the changes continued long after the towers had collapsed.
I am not trying to say HAARP did it. Wood has herself suggested this on various radio programs.
The sloppiness is on your part for offering such a pathetic attempt to defend Wood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ad.johnson
Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:20 am Post subject: Re: 9/11 and The Hutchison Effect – An Ace in the Hole – Par |
|
|
| micpsi wrote: | | I am not trying to say HAARP did it. Wood has herself suggested this on various radio programs. |
Oh really? Dates, times - audio links please?
Please can we have a transcript posted here of the exact remarks she has made.
Start here:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/911/
Reasonably easy to find most of the broadcasts.
So MicPsi, how did the earth's magnetic field ANTICIPATE the "plane crash"?
If it was planes, Micky, why is the damage inconsistent? If it wasn't planes, can you suggest to our dear readers what it was?
Otherwise, looks like MicPsi does not telll the truth...
Does MicPsi have his own website? Does he have data available for analysis and public scrutiny?
Thanks so much!
_________________
I use my real name - Andrew Johnson - not some obscure handle. It works for me! Will it work for you?
Ask the tough questions!
http://www.checktheevidence.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
