|
| :: Previous topic :: Next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bulletin
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 56
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:43 pm Post subject: MITOP and the Double Bind |
  |
|
| Quote: | I want to elaborate somewhat on the idea of transparent conspiracy (see part 3), lest the idea seem too big to chew. It is chewable, but it takes a little work. Even though I have been chewing on it for some time, I am only now arriving at the conclusion, as I pointed out in part 4, that the theory is correct.
First of all, let's give it a name that will itself be more transpaent: MITOP. We are familiar with LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose) and MIHOP (Made It Happen On Purpose). Now we have "Made It Transparent On Purpose."
What do so many people now think 9/11 was an inside job? Because there are so many reasons to think so? Yes--for all of those reasons, and for one more that not so many people may have thought of: we are supposed to think so. The perpetrators, the people on the inside (Orwell's "Inner Party") want us to think so.
http://www.geocities.com/mdmorrissey/logical6.htm |
It's an interesting theory. I would argue that it's easy in hindsight to suggest that such a contradictory approach was foolproof. It's also easy to forget how much effort had to be expended (propaganda, controlling leaks and investigations) to maintain the coverup. Though it is debatable, one could make the case that the American public was more cynical (on 9/11) than they were when JFK was shot and thus less trusting of establishment media.
Were the Big Lie/double think/Shock and Awe effects more beneficial than maintaining an illusion of shared nationalism? Hard to say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
indigitydogdignation
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 313
|
| Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting idea. We've heard this from Fintan and many others; the inside job was meant to be obvious enough, at least to certain types.
The 911 truth movement is too poisoned with disinfo/change artists to succeed on it's own (at least from what we've encountered so far,) yet there's enough good evidence if presented directly and unadulterated to bring the U.S. govt to it's knees in the wake of a major military disaster, perhaps to engender a false concensus of faithlessness, as the definitions of 'nation' and 'U.S. sovereignty' are reworked for the sake of 'world peace.' To put it plainly, 911 has given the bastards-that-be more choices, more powerful ones, based partly, or even largely, on the fact that the 911 truth movement is mostly an inside job as well.
The challenge is to draw attention to deliberate and obvious distortions of common sense from within the movement, and I think these can best be illustration by debunking the far-fetched, fact humping fantasies of a mid-air, near free-fall "explosion" of the twin towers, ...still considered plausible to many truthers, or even most of them - very scary, and so totally unimpowering. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rumpl4skn
Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 2854
Location: 36� 3'N x 86�40'W
|
| Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd spent a lot of time over the past few years trying to summarize why the transparancy. The writer affirms that the duality between the two obvious lies is the op, the Orwellian end game, and I have to agree.
Combine this with the ongoing social op of "put-down humor" and ridicule of anyone who acts, dresses or thinks "outside the norm", and the you have simplistic yet effective control over society. It literally becomes undesirable to be seen as someone who questions blatant contradictions offered as co-existing realities.
I'm reminded of other ongoing "word play" ops. The power elite pioneered a lot of these socio-political techniques when their visible face was 'The Nazis'. Years later, we were introduced to the concept of 'NeoNazis'. Now, we have major ops being pulled, and the fingers deliberately pointed at the new visible face, the NeoCon. Such similarity of labels, such parallels of evil activity and deceit.
Excellent article, now I have to read the first 5.
Thanks.
_________________
"No matter what happens, ever... there's ALWAYS at least one reason. And the top reason is ALWAYS money." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hdog
Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 77
|
| Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| indigitydogdignation wrote: | Interesting idea. We've heard this from Fintan and many others; the inside job was meant to be obvious enough, at least to certain types.
The 911 truth movement is too poisoned with disinfo/change artists to succeed on it's own (at least from what we've encountered so far,) yet there's enough good evidence if presented directly and unadulterated to bring the U.S. govt to it's knees in the wake of a major military disaster, perhaps to engender a false concensus of faithlessness, as the definitions of 'nation' and 'U.S. sovereignty' are reworked for the sake of 'world peace.' To put it plainly, 911 has given the bastards-that-be more choices, more powerful ones, based partly, or even largely, on the fact that the 911 truth movement is mostly an inside job as well.
The challenge is to draw attention to deliberate and obvious distortions of common sense from within the movement, and I think these can best be illustration by debunking the far-fetched, fact humping fantasies of a mid-air, near free-fall "explosion" of the twin towers, ...still considered plausible to many truthers, or even most of them - very scary, and so totally unimpowering. |
You're not saying the Towers collapsed are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
indigitydogdignation
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 313
|
| Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | hdog: You're not saying the Towers collapsed are you? |
No, not exactly. I should have explained myself. I expect that charges of some sort(s) were used, but primarily or even exclusively in the core. If I were a perp, I would understand that the floor truss connections couldn't possibly take more weight than they were rated for (only 5x their normal load;) I would know that initiating the collapse by bringing the falling caps down on the trusses would assure their failure and the failure of all floor truss connections below. I would know that the perimeter sections would peel off and fall out to the sides, as they did, but that taking the core down in toto would require more charges. I have every reason to beleive that many of the squibs were created by these explosions, expecially those that were most far removed from the impact wave.
The cores were taken down completely, while large sections of perimeter anchored at ground level survived with minimal damage - a very telling indication of CD of the core. Naturally, in the higher areas of the building the perimeter sections were connected only to each other and to the floor trusses. These perimeter sections came unhinged in the most natural way and dragged massive amounts of dust with them, and the dust can easily be accounted for by the four inches of lightweight concrete in the floor sections.
The speed of the collapse is key. You Tube --->North Tower WTC1 collapse from Hoboken<---- and you will clearly see a sizeable chunk of perimeter falling well ahead of the impact wave. That 'the towers fell at nearly free-fall speed,' is a cruel fantasy, and I'm certain beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Steven Jones, the Loose Change crew and countless other high-profile 'truth' sources know that it's a crock. "Free-fall" or "near free-fall" speed is the central component of a grossely exaggerated CD theory that has nevertheless gained wide acceptance in the movement, and has done untold damage to our cause. To make a long story short, a wide variety of emotional levers have been used to trick 'twoofers' into believing that ALL parts of the official accounts of the collapses are catagorically bullshit. But in the end, the official account of the tower collapses looks better than even the most conservative CD theories commonly associated with the truth movement.
Are we getting what we deserve?
We don't deserve to be constantly lied to, but the fact of the matter is that we are being deceived and thrown off course, on all fronts. Brain candy comes in all flavors, shapes and sizes, and if we keep sucking on it ...we get what we deserve. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hugh Manatee
Joined: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 77
Location: In Context
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, the crime was not intended to be transparent to anyone.
It just couldn't be completely masked and, more importantly, the perps KNEW that the CIA-NIST-FEMA psyops media would cover-up for them just as it has for decades including in the 1990s - Waco, OKCity, TWA800, etc.
So just enough cover story had to be available to weave a cover story-
>jet fuel fires
>the vague appearance of a 'pancake collapse'
The political climate for exploiting the next big bang into kick-starting a hotter oil war was all ready and waiting when 9/11 happened.
And the ship of war was pushed far enough out to sea to prevent any return once folks started figuring out the scam and saying "hey, wait a minute. That's impossible. Look at the evidence."
This is very much how the murder of JFK was done, too-
The climate was ripe and eager for a coup.
Security was stripped.
The A-team professionals were allowed to do their job.
The patsy was disposed of.
The evidence was collected, destroyed, suppressed.
The Vietnam war was restarted with big bucks for the MIC and no looking back.
_________________
What shall we watch tonight?
Propaganda, social engineering, role modeling, conditioning, adrenalin markers, or desensitization? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
