Is The "WTC Directed-Energy Weapon Hypothesis" Pla

[CB_Brooklyn]

Is The "WTC Directed-Energy Weapon Hypothesis" Plausible?


Judy and Morgan were not even aware that the military had directed-energy weapons.

But after examining the WTC data, they determined that a directed-energy weapon was used, and therefore the military MUST have them.

So they searched for evidence of its existence and found it, and documented it in their paper:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam7.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsAppendix1.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsAppendix2.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsAppendix3.html

-------------
full article here:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/207

[FaxMam]

IMHO - Patent nonsense

[stallion4]

CB_Brooklyn is a well known internet spammer of 9/11 disinformation, i.e., no planes at the wtc, space beams at the WTC, holograms, tv fakery, you name it..

[Lord Carpainter]

"Spammer"? How is posting research 'spamming'?

[Lord Carpainter]

I have not seen CB push 'holograms'. Stop using stereotyped names for these alternative theories, which are only used by the ignorant mainstreamers of the movement who haven't done any checking on the theories at all. Also, why 'space beams'? A energy weapon would not necessarily have to be in space. 'Space beams' is nothing more than another term used by the mainstreamers of the movement, who aren't aware that not everyone who believes in DEW use on 9/11 believes the DEWs were in space. Calling these theories disinfo is something that has been done by known shills such as Alex Jones, Steven Jones, and Eric Hufschmid.