The Apotheosis of Hillary Clinton

[Ormond]

This refers to Fintan's November 2005 BRILLIANT Inside Track internet broadcast of "EXIT BUSH: ENTER THE DRAGON"

I have the advantage of having worked at the old Arkansas Gazette newspaper in 1979-81, during the Clinton's early careers. so I think I understood Fintan's analysis of how Presidential election dynamics really work. Votes and the Electoral 'Closet', and the tweaks of fraud are incidental to the pre-ordained nature of Presidential selection, and archtypes of family dynamics are a major key to how it's done.
But when I've been telling people as a matter of fact that Hillary will be the next President, they literally laugh in my face. "the campaigns havn't even started yet", or "the Democrats would be stupid to run someone so difficult to sell to the public", and "Hillary's got too much baggage".

Maybe so. But people also laughed in '76 at the suggestion that a former hollywood actor would ever be President, and they laughed again at the suggestion that a governor of a po-dunk state like Arkansas would ever be president.

All this has been in part a 'desensitization' process for the electorate. After Reagan, few noticed that the new president happened to be former head of CIA. After the Clinton scandal, few noticed that the son of a living former president, with no other qualification than a hasty stint as Governor of Texas became President.
Further, nobody seemed to notice that Bush I, Gore, and Kerry threw their election bids. Kerry should have been the dead givaway on that trick. the voting fraud has only been to tweak it so the pre-ordained candidate is installed on schedule. All these guys have been in on it. That's the real election fraud.
Meanwhile, all these guys have been acquiring unprecedented powers for the Executive Branch to pass on to the next one. War powers without Congress (Bush I) Line item veto; Federal agency attack and murder of women and children on American soil (Waco, Ruby Ridge),and lots more (Clinton) Commander and Chief : domestic spying with impunity, and you know the rest (Bush II).
Each one quietly has pardoned the last one and their minions, of their crimes in office, upon inauguration. When was the last time "baggage" slowed down any coporate favorite?

So this much we know. The open question now is, 'who next'?

Just for fun, take a look at examples of the the advance job inserting Hillary memes tailored for different mind sets.
Hillary, the pro-abortion, formerly nemisis of the Christian right, is now being marketed in conjunction with the tweaking of Christianity via the DaVinci Code mythology shifting attention from Jesus toward Mary Magdalene. And whatever you think of religion, this stuff has been selling big time to the religious public. I don't think these cultural shifts are co-incedental.



And the url below shows you the more 'official' campaign slogans you'll be seeing as stickers on car bumpers. My favorite is "Just Vote for the Bitch" --- appeals to a different mind set.
And make a note that the same outfit is selling the 'anti-Hillary' slogans too....which are a bit lame relative to the 'pro-Hillary' selection.

http://www.cafepress.com/buy/hillary/-/pv_design_details/pg_1/id_9293067/opt_/fpt_/c_/hlv_t

The one below is also pre-Hillary advance predictive programming: "We need a woman to stop the war...." Notice they take the meme further than simply "Bush's War", but All war.
This scam has been sold before---By Woodrow Wilson who promised no American involvement Europe's war duriing his second term election campaign. Then promptly plunged the US into wwI once inaugerated.



All these early memes are pure bullshit, of course. But you will see people parroting this crap and believing it during Hillary's Apotheosis. Just as the American public fell for Woodrow Wilson's famous 1916 slogan, "HE KEPT US OUT OF WAR!"
The counter-slogan was already prepared to launch when Wilson did enter the war, calling it 'THE WAR TO END ALL WARS'. This is a very old game.

The advance job is being marketed on multiple levels, morphed to suit conservative Christians to radical 'femdom' pagans. She'll also pick up the Green/Nader votes due to her frequent presence in UN organizations.

But the point is, this kind of socially engineered campaigning isn't so much about the votes. It's planting the image of a President Hillary Clinton in everyone's minds almost daily so that people will accept it, no matter what the circumstances of her 'victory'. That's how the last 4 presidents sailed into office under questionable circumstances. Nobody raised the right questions.

I agree with Fintan on the broadcast that we might as well get used to it....Hillary is going to be the next 'suit'. We may not be able to prevent that. So that leaves us with studying and understanding now, what it will mean. Most of the public will be assuming that she'll bring 'peace' and bring the troops home, for that will be heavily implied as her campaign heats up. We know she won't, for perpetual war is still necessary for her to remain Commander and Chief. So perhaps we need to be informing people no what's really going to happen between 2009-2012. And to know that, read UN Agenda 21, and the 1989 Rome document establishing the International Criminal Court, for starters. And Google Hillary's long association with the UN and read her past statements. She's a Globalist.


Comments?

[Jerry Fletcher]

Excellent post, Ormond.

As you know, I agree with your astute observations.

Still, it was shocking to see an entire page of "Hillary 08" campaign paraphernalia - I think this one's a good comment on how they're gonna spin this election:



They didn't have anything I liked, so I made my own:


hehe. anyway...

Where do you think 'she' is gonna go with the executive power? Do you think she's gonna be the emcee for this UN Agenda 21?

I've actually kind of ignored this Agenda 21 thing, cause it was so thoroughly trumpeted by the fakes as 'proof' of population reduction and the impending Orwellian society blah blah blah that I was kind of 'over it' before even investigating it. It smelled like a red herring even from a distance to me - but then again, that's where they'd probably hide any truly diabolical info anyway so...

I'll familiarize myself with it, but feel free to give me the lowdown if you want - or maybe you have in another post here somewhere - I'll look.

So, other than the Hegelian 'solution' to the problems created by Bush Co. which will condition the voters to accept her appointment, what else do you think the dragon's gonna have on her plate other than simply PR for the corporate fiefdom and continued erosion of civil liberty in the guise of state protection?

[Ormond]

Heh heh, you know Jerry, they could actually use that slogan you came up with. They'd stick in on hard core feminists sites.

My best friend is a Republican, hates Hillary, and he cracked up over "Just vote for the Bitch", and said he had to hand it to them, that was a good one.

We can laugh now, but it's not gonna be funny when say, Haliburton decides to claim whole tracks of extand lower middle class neighborhoods and gets to do it under the new interpretation of emminent domain. This is now on the books, and they've seized homeowner's properties already with it. The won't do this too noticably until after the next President is installed.

So this is the sort of thing I think will happen under Hillary. The same agena we see now will just keep rolling on, whomever takes the throne. The reason for Hillary to be implanted there seems to me strictly for the deception mileage they can get out of focusing people's attention on having the first woman president. That will keep people looking at the left hand for a few years, while the right hand is doing away with borders, seizing private property, and introducing UN and NATO 'Peace Keepers' gradually into acceptance.

That's really just for starters, too. I'm taking my clues from UN documents because what they've got on their 2010-2012 timetable is already being cleared to be possible in the US and Canada very soon.

Rotating troops and National Guard into Iraq isn't just about occupying Iraq. Most of those guys are going to come back as the new cops, all full of PTSD and they won't think when they're ordered into a city full of 'enemy insurgents'. They're being programmed.

To collaborate this suggestion, my Republican friend told me that a cop friend of his told me that the cops have already been told that their role is no longer protection of the public, but protection from the public.

The former police chief of Seattle has been writing about this change, warning us it's coming.

So jeeze......ughh. Is there any good news these days? lol...

[Ormond]

Agenda 21 outlines a global plan to create 'habitat zones', written up in 1989 and scheduled to get rolling by 2010.

I have friends up and down the Gulf coast, and the huricane destruction is in fact being handled by Haliburton. They are using illegal laborers--they won't hire local peasants. Any properties where the people were killed or behind on their taxes or mortgages, Haliburton has siezed. I don't know how much, but we're talking huge chunks of Gulf real Estate from New Orleans to Biloxi.

Remember the 'habitats' in the news last year, that Haliburton brought into some place on the coast for people to live in? Those are basically little prefab cells. prison type narrow bunk beds they stick out from the walls to 'sleep six' like sardines.

I remember thinking this was pretty fishy, but when I read in Agenda 21 the same language, along with the full plan, I think it's clear this is what they are doing. They're subtle about it. It gets no press now. We know almost nothing about the 200 mile coast stretch, because they've kept all media hype on New Orleans. And hey! They just had Mardis Gras, so everything must be A-Okay....

hmm.....I don't think so. Stinks to high himmel.

[Jerry Fletcher]

[Toto]

I am all for a women as Pres but not her. I do see much of this Hillary bashing is based on her gender though rather than who she actual is. Having a women in power alone might actual empower other women. This is good.

[Ormond]

It's not her gender that's an issue, it's her history and associations. She's a Globalist.
Fintan put it well in Enter the Dragon: they'll use her to put a feminine face on Fascism.
As for individuality and freedom of expression, we glimpsed her brand of feminism in the 90's---'political correctness'. Political correctness is just a nice way to say do as your told or else.
In 30 years, I've never seen a sign that she gives a flying fuck about women, chidren, or anyone. People who've worked for her fear her for her rudeness, temper fits, and vengfulness.

How about this. Hillary is sortof a female Dick Cheney (only smarter).

[Toto]

Ormond she (clinton) probally does not care about women or anyone for that matter. These people are controlled puppets. They are going to put in who they want in but the fact she is a women may inspire other women thats all. There is some good to every so-called negative situation.

[Janama]

Didn't Rupert Murdoch just give her the kiss of death by supporting a fund raiser for her for the NY senate elections??

[Fintan]

More like the seal of approval. A signal to the wise.

Yes the true lefties in the Democratic Party will bitch and moan about it,
but in the end they'll back her 'cos the alternative is more right-wing rule.

[Ormond]

I just saw the latest Newsbyte on the Break for News front page.

[Toto]

This topic is on Wing Tv http://www.wingtv.net/todaysshow/todaysshow.php